Cultural Norm and Personal Security: The Bifurcation Point of the Sociocultural System

4

Abstract

The work examines the current state of the sociocultural environment and raises the question of how to assess the direction of cultural changes. The author argues for the divergence cultural and civilizational development vectors and posits that the primary contradiction within the sociocultural system, in the present cultural-historical context, arises from the dichotomy of The identified trends in civilizational development necessitate a reevaluation of fundamental cultural norms related to human security, highlighting a critical juncture in the evolution of these security norms. Consequently, addressing the issue of changing norms is linked to the concept of artification, which refers to the transformation of the natural into the artificial, and naturalization, which denotes the conversion of the artificial into the natural. In this context, the sociocultural system is analyzed through the lens of processes of reproduction and development, particularly in relation to the transformations in the context of the “naturalization and artification”. Based on the information presented, the objective of this work is to establish a theoretical framework for analyzing the key concepts of the sociocultural system within the space-time continuum of contemporary reality through the application of bifurcation theory. This study offers a theoretical and methodological justification for utilizing bifurcation theory in the examination of sociocultural systems and elaborates on the essence and content of the theoretical construct. According to bifurcation theory, the sociocultural system encompasses three parameters: phase space, time, and the laws of evolution, which collectively enable us to describe the state of the system. The author outlines the key dynamic and system-forming characteristics of a sociocultural system. In conclusion, a sociocultural system, as defined by bifurcation theory, can be conceptualized as a space comprising three topologically equivalent planes: material existence (activities influenced by the type of civilization), cultural existence (cultural norms and standards), and spiritual existence (personal meanings and superordinate values). The multidimensional analysis of time cycles indicates that the sociocultural system is currently undergoing a qualitative transformation, during which the control parameters of the system—specifically security and subjectivity—are evolving. This qualitative transition in the system necessitates the selection of a trajectory for the development of cultural norms, particularly in the context of disrupted cycles of cultural translation and the rapid emergence of new elements within intellectualized digital spaces.

General Information

Keywords: a sociocultural system, cultural norm, personal security, subjectivity, normal regulation, activity, bifurcation theory

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2024200409

Funding. This paper has been supported by the Kazan Federal University Strategic Academic Leadership Program (PRIORITY-2030)

Received: 11.05.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Gilemkhanova E.N. Cultural Norm and Personal Security: The Bifurcation Point of the Sociocultural System. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2024. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 78–87. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2024200409. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6-ti t. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collected works: In 6 volumes. Problems of mental development]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Gromyko Yu.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya i al'ternativy tsifrovizatsii [Cultural-historical psychology and alternatives to digitalization]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2023. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 27-40. DOI:10.17759/chp.2023190204. (In Russ.).
  3. Gurevich P.S. Dukhovnoye protivoborstvo tsivilizatsiy [Spiritual confrontation of civilizations]. Sovremennyye global'nyye vyzovy i natsional'nyye interesy: XVI Mezhdunarodnyye Likhachevskiye nauchnyye chteniya (19—21 maya 2016 g. Sankt-Peterburg) [Modern global challenges and national interests: XVI International Likhachev Scientific Readings]. Sankt-Peterburg: SPbGUP, 2016, pp. 68—70. (In Russ.).
  4. Gurov O.N. V.S. Stopin: vzglyady na tekhnogennuyu tsivilizatsiyu [V.S. Stepin: views on technogenic civilization]. Pivovarovskiye chteniya [Pivovarovsky readings], 2022, pp. 53-58. (In Russ.).
  5. Dubrovskii V.Ya. Ocherki po obshchei teorii deyatel'nosti [Essays on the general theory of activity.]. Moscow: NNF «Institut razvitiya im. G.P. Shchedrovitskogo», 2011. 576 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Zil'berman D.B. K ponimaniyu kul'turnoi traditsii [Towards an understanding of cultural tradition]. Moscow: NNF «Institut razvitiya im. G.P. Shchedrovitskogo», 2015. 623 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Zinchenko V.P. Kommentariy psikhologa k trudam i dnyam G.P. Shchedrovitskogo [Psychologist's commentary on the works and days of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. Poznayushcheye myshleniye i sotsial'noye deystviye [Cognitive thinking and social action], Moscow: F.A.S.-media, 2004. 544 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Kantor V.K. Russkiy yevropeyets — Yuriy Lotman [Russian European — Yuri Lotman] Yuriy Mikhaylovich Lotman [Yuri Mikhailovich Lotman]. Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2009. 399 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Kudryavtsev V.T. Culture as Self-Perception. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology,2016. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 113–128. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2016120307
  10. Levyash I.YA. K. Marks i P. Sorokin: poisk integrativnoy paradigmy [Marx and P. Sorokin: search for an integrative paradigm]. Pitirim Aleksandrovich Sorokin [Pitirim Aleksandrovich Sorokin]. Sapov V.V. (ed.). Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2013. 606 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Leont'yev D.A. Kachestvo zhizni i blagopoluchiye: ob"yektivnyye, sub"yektivnyye i sub"yektnyye aspekty [Quality of life and well-being: objective, subjective and subjective aspects] Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2020. Vol. 41, no. 6. pp. 86-95. (In Russ.).
  12. Makasheva N.A. Kondrat'yev i novaya metodologicheskaya povestka dnya v ekonomike [Kondratiev and the new methodological agenda in economics] Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal], 2021, no. 7 (1), pp. 50-66. DOI:10.32609/j.ruje.7.56826 (In Russ.).
  13. Martsinkovskaya T.D. G.G. Shpet - parafraz na sovremennuyu temu [G.G. Shpet - a paraphrase on a modern topic]. In Shchedrin T.G. (ed.), Gustav Gustavovich Shpet. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2014. 606 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Mikheyeva Ye.V., Prygin G.S. Instrument teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya issledovaniya sub"yektnosti v situatsiyakh neopredelennosti [A tool for theoretical modeling of the study of subjectivity in situations of uncertainty]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2023, no. 4. pp. 116-128. DOI:10.20323/1813-145X_2023_4_133_116 (In Russ.).
  15. Muzyka O.A. Bifurkatsiya i konflikt: mnogoobraziye vzglyadov i sovremennyye podkhody [Bifurcation and conflict: diversity of views and modern approaches]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta imeni A.P. Chekhova [Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute named after A.P. Chekhov], 2014, no. 2, pp. 305-309. (In Russ.).
  16. Nikitin V.A. Sotsiokul'turnyye izmeneniya, opredelyayushchiye novyye zadachi issledovaniya obrazovaniya [Sociocultural changes that determine new tasks in education research]. In Marach V.G. (ed.), Chteniya pamyati G.P. Shchedrovitskogo 2008-2009 godov [Readings in memory of G.P. Shchedrovitsky 2008-2009]. Moscow: Nekommercheskiy nauchnyy fond «Institut razvitiya im. G.P. Shchedrovitskogo», 2010. 480 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: Ast, 2021. 736 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Petrovskiy V.A. O statuse «YA» v kul'turno-deyatel'nostnom diskurse [On the status of “I” in cultural and activity discourse]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2023. Vol. 19, no.1, pp. 35—40. DOI:10.17759/chp.2023190105 (In Russ.).
  19. Piskoppel' A.A. «Kul'tura» i ee ponyatiinoe okruzhenie [“Culture” and its conceptual environment]. Etnometodologiya: problemy, podkhody, kontseptsii [Ethnomethodology: problems, approaches, concepts]. Moscow, 2001. Vol. 8. 160 p. (In Russ.).
  20. Rats M.V. «Iskusstvennoye» i «yestestvennoye» [“Artificial” and “natural”]. In Shchedrovitsky P.G. (eds.), Georgiy Petrovich Shchedrovitskiy [Georgy Petrovich Shchedrovitsky]. Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2010. 600 p. (In Russ.).
  21. Rozin V.M. Nauchnyye issledovaniya i skhemy v Moskovskom metodologicheskom kruzhke [Scientific research and schemes in the Moscow Methodological Circle]. Moscow: NNF «Institut razvitiya im. G.P. Shchedrovitskogo, 2011. 496 p. (In Russ.).
  22. Salomatova O.V. Kontseptsiya tsifrovoi igry S. Edvards v kontekste kul'turno-istoricheskoi paradigm [The concept of a digital game S. Edwards in the context of the cultural-historical paradigm]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2023. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 30-38. DOI:10.17759/ chp.2023190304. (In Russ.).
  23. Sizikova T.E. K itogam Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «L. S. Vygotskii i A. R. Luriya: kul'turno — istoricheskaya psikhologiya i voprosy tsifrovizatsii v sotsial'nykh praktikakh» [To the results of the International Congress “L. S. Vygotsky and A. R. Luria: cultural-historical psychology and issues of digitalization in social practices”]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2023. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 76-79. DOI:10.17759/chp.2023190210. (In Russ.).
  24. Smirnov S.A. L.S. Vygotskii i tsifra: Vyzov dlya kul'turno-istoricheskoi psikhologii [Vygotsky and a number: A challenge for cultural-historical psychology]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2023. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 41-51. DOI:10.17759/chp.2023190205. (In Russ.).
  25. Sorokin P.A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Human. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1992. 543 p. (In Russ.).
  26. Chernyak L.S. Vnenakhodimost' v dialoge: samodeterminatsiya mysli i determinatsii vnemyslennyye [Externality in dialogue: self-determination of thought and non-thoughtful determination]. In Akhutin A.V. (eds.), Vladimir Solomonovich Bibler. Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2009. 375 p. (In Russ.).
  27. Shchedrovitskii G.P. K ponyatiyu «kul'tura»: izvlecheniya iz tekstov [On the concept of “culture”: extracts from texts]. Etnometodologiya: problemy, podkhody, kontseptsii [Ethnomethodology: problems, approaches, concepts]. Moscow, 2011. Vol. 16, 168 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Barros E. Understanding the Influence of Digital Technology on Human Cognitive Processes: A Review, 2024. DOI:10.20944/preprints202404.1844.v1.
  29. Brady W.J., Crockett M.J. Norm Psychology in the Digital Age: How Social Media Shapes the Cultural Evolution of Normativity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2024, no. 19, pp. 62-64. DOI:10.1177/17456916231187395
  30. Burrell J., Fourcade M. The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology, 2021. Vol. 47, pp. 213-237.
  31. Caceres-Carrasco F.R., Santos F.J., Guzman C. Social capital, personal values and economic development: effect on innovation. An international analysis. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2020. Vol. 33, pp. 70-95.
  32. Floridi L., Cowls J., King T.C., Taddeo M. How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence, 2021. Vol. 144, pp. 125-151.
  33. George A.H., Fernando M., George A.S., Baskar T., Pandey D. Metaverse: The next stage of human culture and the internet. International Journal of Advanced Research Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJARTET), 2021. Vol. 12, pp. 1-10.
  34. Korte M. The impact of the digital revolution 
on human brain and behavior: where 
do we stand? Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2020. Vol. 22, pp. 101-111. DOI:10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mkorte.
  35. Korteling J.H., van de Boer-Visschedijk G.C., Blankendaal R.A., Boonekamp R.C., Eikelboom A.R. Human-versus artificial intelligence. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2021, no. 4. DOI:10.3389/frai.2021.622364.
  36. Krisnana I., Hariani V., Kurnia I.D., Arief Y.S. The use of gadgets and their relationship to poor sleep quality and social interaction on mid-adolescents: a cross-sectional study. International journal of adolescent medicine and health, 2022. Vol. 34. DOI:10.1515/ijamh-2019-0101.
  37. Luongo A., Ferretti M., Di Nino S. Stability and bifurcation of structures: statical and dynamical systems. Springer Nature, 2023. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-27572-2.
  38. Ordonez‐Ponce E. The role of local cultural factors in the achievement of the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development, 2023. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1122-1134.
  39. Shanmugasundaram M., Tamilarasu А. The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2023, no. 2. DOI:10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077.
  40. Siemens G., Marmolejo-Ramos F., Gabriel F., Medeiros K., Marrone R., Joksimovic S., Maarten de Laat Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2022. Vol. 3, pp. 100-107. DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107.
  41. Sotiropoulou A., Papadimitriou D., Maroudas L. Personal values and typologies of social entrepreneurs. The case of Greece. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2021. Vol. 12, pp. 1-27.
  42. Spencer H. The Data of Ethics Justice. Routledge, 2021. URL: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/331/Spencer_0622.pdf (Accessed 01.03.2024)
  43. Winfield A.F., Blackmore S. Experiments in artificial culture: from noisy imitation to storytelling robots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 2022. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2020.0323.

Information About the Authors

Elvira N. Gilemkhanova, PhD in Psychology, Psychologist of the highest qualification category, Associate Professor, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Senior Researcher at the Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research (Kazan Branch), Kazan, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-4447, e-mail: enkazan@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 15
Previous month: 0
Current month: 15

Downloads

Total: 4
Previous month: 0
Current month: 4