Structural and functional characteristics of teenager’s family and his family identity specifics

2559

Abstract

The research is directed on the investigation of teenager’s family identity. In the pre- vious articles we have described the phenomena of family identity and its research methods. The aim of this article is an account of the empirical results of the research of family identity of teenagers with different structural and functional family charac- teristics. According to one of the research hypothesis, there is a correlation between the structural and functional family characteristics and teenager’s family identity, i.e. his experience of belonging to the family system. Moreover comparing to such factors of family identity as a family type (two-parent, one-parent, binuclear, foster), teenager’s sex and age, the factor of teenager’s growing up in the family with definite structural and functional characteristics is the most important one. There are the results of the research of 290 different-age teenagers with a help of Scale FACES-3 and the author’s inquirer of Family Identity and its analysis in this article.

General Information

Keywords: family, family psychology, family identity, Circumplex model be D.H. Olson, family cohesion, family flexibility, structural and functional family characteristics, family satisfaction, inquirer of Family Identity

Journal rubric: Empirical Researches

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2016240203

For citation: Strokova S.S. Structural and functional characteristics of teenager’s family and his family identity specifics. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2016. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 29–46. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2016240203. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Burovikhina I.A. Socialnaya situaciya razvitiya kak uslovie formirovaniya obraza mira sovremennogo podrostka. [Social development situation as a condition of con- temporary teenager world image forming] Diss. …kand. psikhol. nauk. M.: MGU, 2013. 313 p.
  2. Varga A.Ya. Sistemnaya semeinaya psikhoterapiya. Kratkii lektsionnyi kurs. [Sys- temic family therapy. A short course of lections] SPb: Rech’, 2001. 144 p.
  3. Varga A.Ya., Khamitova I.Yu. Teoriya semeinykh sistem Myurreya Bouena. [Murrey Bowen’s family systems theory ] Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal [Moscow psychotherapeutic magazine]. 2005. № 1. Pp. 137—146.
  4. Gorodnova M.Yu. Bazisnye koping-strategii i tipy funktsionirovaniya semei podro- stkov s geroinovoi narkomaniei [Basic coping-strategies and types of functioning of the families with heroine addicted teenagers]: Avtoref. diss. … kand. med. nauk. SPb.,2004. 20 p.
  5. Karabanova O.A. Psihologiya semejnyh otnoshenij i osnovy semejnogo konsul’- tirovaniya [Family relationship psychology and basic family consulting]. M.: Gardari- ki, 2005. 320 p.
  6. Karpova V.M., Filippova E.V. Predstavleniya o roditelskoy i budushchey seme v po- drostkovom i yunosheskom vozraste [Teenagers’ and young men’s ideas of their par- ent and future family]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2013. № 4. Pp. 84—97.
  7. Mineeva O.A. Vozrastnye i gendernye osobennosti soderzhaniya implitsitnykh teorii sem’I [Age and gender specifics of implicit family theories content]. Avtoref. diss… kand psikhol. nauk. M.: MGU, 2011. 35 p.
  8. Mikhailova N.F. Sistematicheskoe issledovanie individual’nogo i semeinogo stressa i kopinga u chlenov semei zdorovykh lits (v svyazi s zadachami psikhodiagnostiki, psikhogigieny, psikhoprofilaktiki) [Systematic research of individual and family stress and coping of healthy family members (considering to the aims of psycho- diagnostics, psychohygiene and psychoprophylaxis)]: diss. … kand. psikhol. nauk. SPb., 1998. 174 p.
  9. Obukhova L.F., Dvornikova I.N. Ritualy kak psikhologicheskoe sredstvo formirovani- ya splochennosti semi [Rituals as psychological agent of family cohesion forming. Psychological science and education]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psy- chological science and education]. 2008. № 4. Pp. 24—34.
  10. Orestova V.R. Formirovanie lichnostnoi identichnosti v starshem podrostkovom i yunosheskom vozraste [Personal identity forming of elder teenagers and youth]. M., tekst dissertatsi, 2001. 178 p.
  11. Strokova S.S. Napravleniya izucheniya semeynoy identichnosti v psikhologii [Ap- proaches to family identity research in psychology]. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Consultiong psychology and psychotherapy]. 2014. Tom 22. № 3. Pp. 8—22.
  12. Fominykh E.S. Semya kak faktor viktimizacii detey s ogranichennymi vozmozh- nostyami zdorovya [Elektronnyy resurs] [Family as a factor of physically challenged victimisation ]. Klinicheskaya i specialnaya psikhologiya [Clinical and special psy- chology]. 2014. Tom 3. № 3. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/2014/n3/Fominih. shtml (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2016)
  13. Khachaturyan S.D., Khudokonenko S.A. Emocionalnoe otnoshenie detey k rodite- lyam v semeynykh sistemakh nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennykh bez lisheniya svobody [Elektronnyy resurs] [Convict minors without imprisonment emotional position to their parents]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and law]. 2011. № 3. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2011/n3/46558.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2016)
  14. Khorosheva E.V. Sravnitelnoe issledovanie semey, imeyushchikh rebenka s norma- tivnym i narushennym razvitiem [Confirming research of the families of children with or without development disorders]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2010. №5. Pp. 52—59.
  15. Chernikov A.V. Sistemnaya semeinaya terapiya: Integrativnaya model’ diagnostiki [Systemic family therapy: Integrative diagnostics model]. M.: Nezavisimaya firma “Klass”, 2001. 208 p.
  16. Eidemiller E.G., Dobryakov I.V., Nikol’skaya I.M. Semeinyi diagnoz i semeinaya psikhoterapiya. Uchebnoe posobie dlya vrachei i psikhologov. [Family diagnosis and family psychotherapy. Textbook for doctors and psychologists] Izd. 2-e, ispr. dop. SPb.: Rech’, 2006. 352 p.
  17. Erikson E. Detstvo i obshchestvo [Childhood and adolescence]. 2 izd, 1963. 200 p.
  18. Yakimova T.V. Spetsifika semeinoi situatsii razvitiya intellektual’no odarennykh po- drostkov [Intellectually gifted teenagers’ family development situation specifics]: Avtoref. diss. … kand. psikhol. nauk. M.,2008. 29 p.
  19. Kouneski E.F. Family assessment and the Circumplex model: new research develop- ments and applications / Department of Family Social Science. Minnesota: Univer- sity of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 2000. 141 p.
  20. Olson D.H. Circumplex model of Marital & Family systems. The Journal of family Therapy, special edition “Empirical approaches to family assessment”. 1999. 22 p.
  21. Pirutinsky S., Kor A. Relevance of the Circumplex model of family ffunctioning among orthodox jews in Israel. The new school psychology Bulletin. 2013, Vol. 10, № 2. Pp. 25—37.
  22. Schrodt P. Family communication schemata and the Circumplex model of family functioning. Western journal of communication. 2005, Vol. 69, №4. Pp. 359—376.

Information About the Authors

Svetlana S. Strokova, PhD in Psychology, Psychologist, Psychological center “Schastlivyi chelovek”, Lecturer, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Ramenskoe, Russia, e-mail: Shiny-s@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3986
Previous month: 25
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 2559
Previous month: 26
Current month: 12