Accessibility of Digital Devices to Preschool Children: Differences in Parents’ Positions

Introduction. The article presents the results of an empirical study, aimed at revealing the peculiarities of parent position concerning the use of gadgets by preschool children on a Russian sample. Objective. The article focuses on the phenomenon of parents’ inconsistent position concerning the use of digital devices by preschoolers. Methods. The study was conducted in February-April, 2021. The questionnaire, elaborated by the authors of the study, was disseminated in social networks. 6376 parents of preschoolers aged from 2 to 7 from Russian Federation participated in the study. The collected data was analyzed with the help of quantitative and qualitative methods. Results and conclusions. The results of the study testify that most Russian parents demonstrate a coherent position in relation to accessibility of digital media to their children — they either give their children limited access to gadgets (66,1%), or completely ban it (5%). A big group of parents (28,9%) give rather controversial answers to questions concerning the accessibility of digital devices to their children, which testifies that they have no coherent strategy. The research demonstrates that many Russian parents face difficulties in organizing their children’s interaction with gadgets and testifies that it is important to organize parents’ counselling and education in relation to these challenges.

1. Gerasimova A.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Obshchaya shkala problemnogo ispol’zovaniya interneta: aprobaciya i validizaciya v rossijskoi vyborke tret’ei versii oprosnika [The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 3 Modified Version: Approbation and Validation on the Russian Sample ]. Konsul’tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 56—79. (In Russ.). DOI:10.17759/cpp.2018260304
2. Klopotova E.E., Romanova Yu.A. Komp’yuternye igry kak faktor poznavatel’nogo razvitiya doshkol’nikov = Computer Games as a Factor in the Cognitive Development of Preschoolers [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 2020. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32—40. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2020170104. (In Russ.).
3. Rubtsova O.V. Cifrovye tekhnologii kak novoe sredstvo oposredovaniya (Chast’ vtorya) [Digital technologies as a new means of mediation (Part Two)]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 2019, Vol. 15, no. 4, рp. 100—108. DOI:10.17759/chp.2019150410
4. Smirnova E.O., Smirnova S.Yu., Sheina E.G. Roditel’skie strategii v ispol’zovanii det’mi tsifrovykh tekhnologii [Elektronnyi resurs]. [Parents’ strategies to use of digital technology by children]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya=Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2019. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 79—87. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2019080408 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.)
5. Soldatova G.U., Voiskunskii A.E. Sotsial’no-kognitivnaya kontseptsiya tsifrovoi sotsializatsii: novaya ekosistema i sotsial’naya evolyutsiya psikhiki [Socio-Cognitive Concept of Digital Socialization: А New Ecosystem and Social Evolution of the Mind]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2021, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 431—450. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-431-450
6. Kholmogorova A.B., Avakyan T.V., Klimenkova E.N., Malyukova D.A. Obshchenie v internete i sotsial’naya trevozhnost’ u podrostkov iz raznykh sotsial’nykh grupp [Internet communication and social anxiety among different social groups of adolescents]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015. Vol. 23 (4), pp. 102—129. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2015230407. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
7. Brito R., Dias P. “Which Apps Are Good for My Children?”: How the Parents of Young Children Select Apps. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2020. Vol. 26: 100188. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100188
8. Chaudron S., Di Gioia R. Gemo M., Young Children (0—8) and Digital Technology — A qualitative study across Europe. EUR 29070 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017. 266 p. DOI:10.2760/294383
9. Clark L.S. Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 2011, Vol.  21, pp. 323—343.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
10. Fröhlich-Gildhoff K. Digitale Medien in der Kita — die Risiken werden unterschaetzt. Frühe Bildung, 2017, Vol. 6 (4), pp. 225—228. DOI:10.1026/2191-9186/ a000332
11. Goh W.W.L, Bay S., Chen V.H.H. Young School Children’s Use of Digital Devices and Parental Rules. Telematics and Informatics, 2015, Vol. 32, pp. 787—795.
12. Kammerl R., Kramer M. The changing media environment and its impact on socialization processes in families. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2016, Vol. 16, pp. 21—27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.002
13. Lim S.S. Trough the Tablet Glass: Transcendent Parenting in an Era of Mobile Media and Cloud Computing. Journal of Children and Media, 2016, Vol. 10 (1), pp. 21—29.
14. Mascheroni M., Ponte C., Jorge A. Digital parenting — The challenges for families in the Digital Age. Göteborg: Nordicom, 2018, 239 p.
15. Palaigeorgiou G. et al. Parental Mediation of Tablet Educational Use at Home and at School: Facilitators or Preventers? Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning (Thessaloniki, Greece, 3 November — 1 December, 2017). Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 924—935.
16. Paus-Hasebrink I., Sinner P., Prochazka F. Children’s online experiences in socially disadvantaged families: European evidence and policy implications. London: EU Kids Online, LSE, 2014. URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/ EUKidsOnline/ EU Kids III/Reports/Disadvantaged_children.pdf (Accessed 01.11.2021).
17. Plowman L., McPake J., Stephen C. The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society, 2010, Vol. 24, pp. 63—74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00180.x
18. Sonck N., Nikken P., de Haan J. Determination of internet mediation: A comparison of the reports by Dutch parents and children. Journal of Children and Media, 2013, Vol. 7 (1), pp. 96—113.
19. Vittrup B., Snider S., Rose K.K., Rippy J. Parental Perceptions of the Role of Media and Technology in Their Young Children’s Lives. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2016, Vol. 14, pp. 43—54.
20. Zaman B. et al. A qualitative Inquiry into the Contextualized Parental Mediation Practices of Young Children’s Digital Media Use at Home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2016. Vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1—22. DOI:10.1080/08838151.20 15.1127240