Conceptualization of the Phenomenon of Subjectness of the Network Community Using a Grounded Theory Method

The study of the characteristics of network communities is due to the increasingly complete transition of social life into the Internet space. Subjectness is a key psychological characteristic of a community that manifests itself in its discourse. The method of grounded theory as one of the most advanced methods in the coding paradigm allows conceptualizing the phenomenon of subjectness of network communities by analyzing their discourse. The article shows how this method is consistently used and how the problems associated with the psychological interpretation of constructs generated from the “empirical field” are overcome. So the problem of the diversity manifestations of subjectness was solved by subjective scaling of the contribution of substantive codes during the reconstruction of the structure of implicit ideas about the subjectness of the network community. Further iterations in the process of constructing a ground theory and the development of a short list of discursive markers of subjectness led to the inclusion methods for comparing factor structures. The analysis of the trolling process made it possible to introduce into the developed model of subjectness the ideas about current and potential components.

1. Busygina N.P. Kachestvennye i kolichestvennye metody issledovanii v psikhologii: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury [Qualitative and quantitative research methods in psychology]. Moscow: Yurait, 2015. 423 p. (In Russ.).
2. Voronin A.N. Metodologicheskie problemy` issledovaniya sub``ektnosti setevy`x soobshhestv [Methodological problems of research of network communities subjectness]. Psixologiya i Psixotexnika = Psychology and Psychotechnics, 2019, no. 3. pp. 1—14. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2019.3.30388 URL: https:// nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30388 (Accessed 15.01.2020). (In Russ.).
3. Voronin A.N., Kovaleva Yu.V. Izmenenie sub”ektnosti setevogo soobshchestva v protsesse trollinga [Change of network community’s subjectivity during trolling process]. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology], 2019, vol. 4, no. 3 (15), pp. 25—61. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
4. Voronin A.N., Grebenshchikova T.A., Kubrak T.A., Pavlova N.D. Sub”ektnost’ setevogo soobshchestva: sravnenie psikhometricheskikh modelei proyavleniya diskursivnykh markerov v kontente [The subjectness of the network community: comparison of psychometric models of the discursive markers manifestation in content]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie nauki = Bulletin MRSU series Psychological science, 2019, no. 3, pp. 6—24. DOI:10.18384/2310-7235-2019-3-6-24 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
5. Gaidar K.M. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya gruppovogo sub”ekta [Socio-psychological concept of a group subject]. Voronezh, 2013. 396 p.
6. Emel’yanova T.P., Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya bol’shikh sotsial’nykh grupp kak kollektivnykh sub”ektov [Psychology of large social groups as collective subjects]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2009, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.).
7. Zhuravlev A.L. Kollektivnyi sub”ekt kak fenomen i ponyatie v sovremennoi psikhologii [Collective subject as a phenomenon and concept in modern psychology]. In Sergienko E.A., Zhuravlev A.L. (eds.) Razrabotka ponyatii sovremennoi psikhologii [Development of the concepts of modern psychology]. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2018, pp. 116—161. (In Russ.).
8. Karpov A.V. Ponyatie “srednyaya gruppa” kak bazovyi kontsept organizatsionnoi psikhologii [The concept of “medium group “ as a basic concept of organizational psychology]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya = Organizational psychology], 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 50—72. (In Russ.).
9. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 445 p. (In Russ.).
10. Pavlova N.D., Voronin A.N., Grebenshchikova T.A., Kubrak T.A. Razrabotka podkhoda k tipologii setevykh soobshchestv na osnove diskursivnykh priznakov kollektivnoi sub”ektnosti [Development of Approach to Typology of Internet Communities based on Discursive Markers of Collective Subjectivity]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika = RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics], 2019, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 341—358. DOI:10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-341- 358 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
11. Strauss A., Korbin Dzh. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p. (In Russ.).
12. Glaser B.G. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing. Sociology Press. Mill Valley, 1992. 129 p.
13. Levine M.S. Canonical analysis and factor comparison. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1977. 62 p.
14. Voronin A.N., Grebenschikova T.A., Kubrak T.A., Nestik T.A., Pavlova N.D. The study of network community capacity to be a subject: digital discursive footprints. Behavioral sciences, 2019. Vol. 9 (12), p. 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9120119