From Children's Giftedness to Real Talent: The Problem of "Transition"

The main problem of gifted children is the "transition" of their increased intellectual capabilities into talent, as the basis of creative activity, or, in another formulation, the transformation of children's giftedness into an actual talent. Analysis of available materials shows that the cognitive need of a significant part of these children takes the character of passive accumulation of a large amount of knowledge and therefore becomes an obstacle to such a transition. The search need is considered to be a basic factor, which is the "engine" of the creative realization of a gifted person, which ensures the search for new solutions and ways of action in contradictory and uncertain situations for the subject, and, thus, becomes the basis of his talent, future creative achievements. It is shown that in a number of gifted children and, above all, in the so-called "prodigies" the need for search is early and very significantly deformed, which in most cases is directly related to social influences. The article deals with the causes and consequences of a significant deformation of the search need in gifted children.

1. Gete I. Aforizmy [Aphorisms] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Mir Aforizmov [World of Aphorisms]. 2021. URL: http://aphoristic-world.ru/aphoristic-world/authors/468-gete-iogann-volfgang (Accessed 8.12.2021). (In Russ.).
2. Gladuell M. Genii i autsaidery: Pochemu odnim vse, a drugim nichego? [Geniuses and Outsiders: Why Someone, and Others?]. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks, 2009. 256 p. (In Russ.).
3. Duek K. Gibkoe soznanie. Novyi vzglyad na psikhologiyu razvitiya vzroslykh i detei [Flexible Consciousness. A new look at the psychology of development of adults and children]. Moscow: izd. Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2013. 410 p. (In Russ.).
4. Landau E. Odarennost' trebuet muzhestva: psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie odarennogo rebenka [Giftedness requires courage: psychological support for a gifted child]. Moscow: Izdatel'skii tsentr "Akademiya", 2002. 144 p. (In Russ.).
5. Leites N.S. Odarennye deti [Gifted children]. In Gippenreiter Yu.B., Romanova V.Ya. (eds.), Psikhologiya individual'nykh razlichii: Uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of individual differences: Textbook]. Moscow: CheRo, 2002, pp. 304–312. (In Russ.).
6. Podd'yakov N.N. Psikhicheskoe razvitie i samorazvitie rebenka-doshkol'nika. Blizhnie i dal'nie gorizonty. St. Petersburg: Obrazovatel'nye proekty, 2021. 230 p. (In Russ.).
7. Rotenberg V.S. «Obraz Ya» i povedenie. Rozhdenie idei ["Self-image" and behavior. Birth of ideas]. Ekaterinburg: Ridero, 2015. 228 p. (In Russ.).
8. Rotenberg V.S., Arshavskii V.V. Poiskovaya aktivnost' i adaptatsiya [Search activity and adaptation]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 193 p. (In Russ.).
9. Rotenberg V.S., Bondarenko S.M. Mozg, obuchenie, zdorov'e [Brain, learning, health]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1989. 239 p. (In Russ.).
10. Seligman M. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya [New positive psychology]. Moscow: Sofiya, 2006. 428 p. (In Russ.).
11. Sukhomlinskii V.A. Serdtse otdayu detyam [I give my heart to the children]. Kiev: Radyans'ka shkola, 1981. 324 p. (In Russ.).
12. Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh osnovanii k sotsial'nym i kul'turnym fenomenam [Creativity: from biological foundations to social and cultural phenomena]. Ushakova D.V., Belova S.S. (eds.). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2011. 736 p. (In Russ.).
13. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Man in Search of Meaning]. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 368 p. (In Russ.).
14. Tsveig S. Shakhmatnaya novella [Chess story]. Moscow: Pravda, 1956. 18 p. (In Russ.).
15. Einshtein A. Avtobiograficheskie zametki [Autobiographical Notes]. In Einshtein A. (eds.), Sobranie nauchnykh trudov v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. [Collection of scientific papers in four volumes. T. 4.]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967, pp. 259–263. (In Russ.).
16. Einshtein A. Pamyati Paulya Erenfesta [In memory of Paul Ehrenfest]. In Einshtein A. (eds.), Sobranie nauchnykh trudov v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. [Collection of scientific papers in four volumes. T. 4.]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967, pp. 190–192. (In Russ.).
17. Asch S.E. Opinions and social pressure [Elektronnyi resurs]. Scientific American, 1955. Vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 31–35. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24943779 (Accessed 15.11.2021).
18. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 2008. Vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 182–185. DOI:10.1037/a0012801
19. Ericsson K.A., Nandagopal K., Roring R.W. Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2005. Vol. 28, no. 3–4, pp. 287–311. DOI:10.4219/jeg-2005-335
20. Gagné F. Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 2004. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 119–147. DOI:10.1080/1359813042000314682
21. Worrell F.C. et al. Gifted Students. Annual Review of Psychology, 2019. Vol. 70, pp. 551–576. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
22. Gulová L., Střelec S. Inclusion of Talented Children. Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 54–68. DOI:10.5817/cphpj-2020-005
23. Hollingworth L.S. Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan, 1926. 374 p. DOI:10.1037/10599-000
24. Klimecká E. Labelling of gifted children in the family from the perspective of teachers and its manifestations at school [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sodobna pedagogika: Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies Let, 2020. Vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 196–212. URL: https://publikace.k.utb.cz/handle/10563/1009817 (Accessed 15.11.2021).
25. Ruthsatz J. et al. Molecular Genetic Evidence for Shared Etiology of Autism and Prodigy. Human Heredety, 2015. Vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 53–59. DOI:10.1159/000373890
26. Myers T., Carey E., Dénes S. Cognitive and Neural Correlates of Mathematical Giftedness in Adults and Children: A Review. Frontiers in psychology, 2017. Vol. 8, article ID 1646, 17 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01646
27. Ninkov I. Education Policies for Gifted Children Within a Human Rights Paradigm: Сomparative Analysis. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2020. Vol. 5, pp. 280–289. DOI:10.1007/s41134-020-00133-1
28. Ruthsatz J., Ruthsatz K., Ruthsatz St.K. The cognitive bases of exceptional abilities in child prodigies by domain: Similarities and differences. Intelligence, 2014. Vol. 44, pp. 11–14. DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.010
29. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 2000. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78. DOI:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
30. Spearman C.E. The abilities of man, their nature and measurement [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal of Philosophical Studies, 1927. Vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 557–560. URL: https://philpapers.org/rec/SPETAO-18 (Accessed 15.11.2021).
31. Stanley J.C. Finding Intellectually Talented Youths and Helping Them Educationally. The Journal of Special Education, 1985. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 363–372. DOI:10.1177/002246698501900312
32. Terman L.M. The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 1954. Vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 221–230. DOI:10.1037/h0060516
33. Terman L.M., Oden M.H. Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol. 5: The Gifted Group at Mid-Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959. 187 p.
34. Yun Dai D. A Jeffersonian vision of nurturing talent and creativity: toward a more equitable and productive gifted education [Elektronnyi resurs]. Asia Pacific Education Review volume, 2015. Vol. 16, pp. 269–279. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-015-9364-y (Accessed 15.11.2021).