Artificial intelligence in research and psychological practices: international experience and identified risks

Context and relevance: Recent research has focused on the specifics of the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies and their consequences. The accumulated experience requires systematization and discussion, especially regarding the possible risks to the mental health of users. Objective: to identify the directions and results of research on the introduction of artificial intelligence in psychological and research practices. Identify the greatest risk areas for using new technologies. Method: scientific and critical analysis, generalization and systematization of publicly presented materials of international research Hypothesis: The positive aspects of the introduction of machine technologies into psychological practice and research are related to the expansion of their capabilities, increased efficiency and accessibility, and the system of significant risks is associated with the development of dependence on algorithms, ethical problems and cognitive vulnerability of users that arise from constant interaction. Results: The positive aspects of the introduction of artificial intelligence are related to the automation and personalization of therapy, counseling and training, the implementation of unique and large-scale research formats, and the negative aspects are associated with the formation of dependence, the impact on the ability to critical thinking and decision-making as the basis of intelligent cognition and behavior, the persistence and globality of the use of anthropo-like technologies may potentially affect the underlying mechanisms of human development and interaction. The basis of prevention is the ethical integration of super-tenologies into the activities of specialists and users. Conclusions. The identified directions and results of the introduction of artificial intelligence emphasize the complex nature of the implementation of integrated models and forms of modern psychological work and research. Recognizing the high potential and effectiveness of artificial intelligence, experts call for a careful analysis of the risks and consequences of its use.

1. Abrar, M., ur Rehman, M., Khalid, S., Ullah, R. (2026). The intersection of artificial intelligence and assistive technologies in the diagnosis and intervention of mental health conditions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11447-9
2. Atmakuru, A., Shahini, A., Chakraborty, S., Seoni, S., Salvi, M., Hafeez-Baig, A., Tan, R.S., Barua, P.D., Molinari, F., Acharya, U.R. (2025). Artificial intelligence-based suicide prevention and prediction: A systematic review (2019—2023). Information Fusion, 114, Article 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102673
3. Baran, F.D.E., Cetin, M. (2025). AI-driven early diagnosis of specific mental disorders: A comprehensive study. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 19, Article 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10253-x
4. Boduroglu, E., Yigiter, M.S. (2026). Artificial intelligence scoring attitudes: Scale development and validation. Education and Information Technologies, 31, 701—726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13836-7
5. Calderita, L.V. Manso, L.J., Bustos, P., Suárez-Mejías, C., Fernández, F., Bandera, A. (2014). Therapist: towards an autonomous socially interactive robot for motor and neurorehabilitation therapies for children. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 1(1), Article e1. https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.3151
6. Craig, T.K., Rus-Calafell, M., Ward, T., Leff, J.P., Huckvale, M., Howarth, E., Emsley, R., Garety, P.A. (2018). AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(1), 31—40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30427-3
7. de la Fuente Tambo, D., Iglesias Moreno, S., Armayones Ruiz, M. (2025). Barriers and enablers for generative artificial intelligence in clinical psychology: A qualitative study based on the COM-B and theoretical domains framework (TDF) models. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 1181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03500-7
8. Demir, M., Aydoğdu, F., Alabay, M.B., Yaşar, H.K., Bozkurt, A. (2026). More than an algorithm: Mental health professionals confront the promise and ethical perils of artificial intelligence. Universal Access in the Information Society, 25, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-025-01297-1
9. Elyoseph, Z., Refoua, E., Asraf, K., Lvovsky, M., Shimoni, Y., Hadar-Shoval, D. (2024). Capacity of generative AI to interpret human emotions from visual and textual data: Pilot evaluation study. JMIR Mental Health, 11, Article e54369. https://doi.org/10.2196/54369
10. Fattahipour, R., Sharififar, S., Teymouri, F., Marzaleh, M.A. (2025). Mental health promotion in disasters: Exploring the synergy of artificial intelligence, spirituality, and psychology: A SWOT analysis. Discover Psychology, 5, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00371-2
11. Hadar-Shoval, D., Elyoseph, Z., Lvovsky, M. (2023). The plasticity of ChatGPT's mentalizing abilities: Personalization for personality structures. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1234397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1234397
12. Han, D.Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence in and beyond healthcare psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 32, 600—607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10101-4
13. Jin, G., Jiang, J., Liao, H. (2024). The work affective well-being under the impact of AI. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 25483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75113-w
14. Kong, Y., Duan, Z. (2024). Boxing behavior recognition based on artificial intelligence convolutional neural network with sports psychology assistant. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 7640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58518-5
15. Kraaijeveld, S.R., Ivanova, D. (2026). Using deepfakes for psychotherapy: Ethical and philosophical issues. AI Ethics, 6, Article 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00918-y
16. Liu, X., Zheng, X., Cui, W. (2024). Psychological counseling with integration of knowledge graph and multi-agent collaboration. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-024-2785-1
17. Poulsen, A., Hickie, I.B., Chong, M.K., LaMonica, H.M., Turner, A., Iorfino, F. (2025). Personalised care, youth mental health, and digital technology: A value sensitive design perspective and framework. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(4), Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09866-x
18. Rodríguez-Ruiz, J., Marín-López, I., Espejo-Siles, R. (2025). Is artificial intelligence use related to self-control, self-esteem and self-efficacy among university students? Education and Information Technologies, 30, 2507—2524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12906
19. Saha, A., Ghosh, A., Khan, K. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) and social emotional learning (SEL): A comprehensive review. International Journal of Engineering in Computer Science, 8(1), 75—85. https://doi.org/10.33545/26633582.2026.v8.i1b.252
20. Saunders, M. (2025). «More or Less Conscious»: Consciousness to-day and to-morrow. Neuroethics, 18, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09579-w
21. Sherrill, A.M., Wiese, C.W., Abdullah, S. Arriaga, R.I. (2025). Teaming with artificial intelligence to learn and sustain psychotherapy delivery skills: Workplace, ethical, and research implications. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 10, 740—748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-025-00484-4
22. Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., Wykowska, A. (2022). Cognitive load affects early processes involved in mentalizing robot behaviour. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 14924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19213-5
23. Spytska, L. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy: Development of intelligent therapeutic systems. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02491-9
24. Sucipto, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on human resource management practices. Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY), 1(1), 138—145. https://doi.org/10.62207/xey9mx18
25. Sulak, S.A., Koklu, N. (2025). Assessment of university students’ earthquake coping strategies using artificial intelligence methods. Scientific Reports, 15, 31897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17555-4
26. Taylor, J.E.T., Taylor, G.W. (2021). Artificial cognition: How experimental psychology can help generate explainable artificial intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 454—475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01825-5
27. Tursunbayeva, A., Fernandez, V. Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Moschera, L. (2026). Artificial intelligence and digital data in recruitment. Exploring business and engineering candidates’ perceptions of organizational attractiveness. European Management Journal, 44(2), 235—244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.03.002
28. Wagner, J., Schwind, A.-S. (2025). Investigating psychotherapists’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence in psychotherapy. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 719. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03071-7
29. Williams, G.Y., Lim, S. (2024). Psychology of AI: How AI impacts the way people feel, think, and behave. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, Article 101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101835
30. Yirmiya, K., Fonagy, P. (2025). Mentalizing without a mind: Psychotherapeutic potential of generative AI. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e79156. https://doi.org/10.2196/79156
31. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., Li, L.D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
32. Zheng, S., Wang, W. (2024). Artificial intelligence and environment behavior psychology based evolution of science fiction movie genres. Current Psychology, 43, 26511—26538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06279-9