Social Status of the Teaching Profession: Self-Determination in Russian Teachers

3221

Abstract

There is a sharp contradiction between the high importance of work performed for society and a low professional status of general education teachers in the Russian society.The article presents outcomes of a sociological survey “Professional Identity of Modern Teacher” carried out by the Monitoring Research Department of the Moscow State University of Psychology & Education in the spring of 2016.This survey reflects the teachers’ self-assessment of the status of their profession.A total of 1,024 teachers of general education organizations were surveyed in 9 federal districts of the Russian Federation, except the Crimea.The survey was conducted on a three-stage stratified probabilistic sample.The research model of the teacher's social status includes the analysis of the three leading components: prestige, respect and satisfaction with work process.According to the results of the survey, despite the teachers' low assessment of the social prestige of their professional group, they perceive their activities as respected by students and their parents, and also feel satisfied with the results of their work.

General Information

Keywords: status, profession, modern teacher, self-determination, social prestige, respect, job satisfaction

Journal rubric: Pedagogical Education

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2017220406

For citation: Husnutdinova M.R. Social Status of the Teaching Profession: Self-Determination in Russian Teachers. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2017. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 38–48. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2017220406. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Arzhanykh E.V., Gurkina O.A., Khusnutdinova M.R.Otnoshenie rossiiskikh pedagogov k kommertsializatsii shkol’nogo obrazovaniya.Rezul’taty I etapa sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [The attitude of Russian educators towards the commercialization of school education.Results of the first stage of sociological research].Moscow: Zircon, 2015.Available at: http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/ adf/Employment_moscow_teenagers_report_2015.pdf (Accessed 26.06.17)
  2. VTSIOM: uchitelyam rossiyane doveryayut bol’she, chem politikam [Elektronnyi resurs] [WCIOM: teachers trust Russians more than politicians].RIA Novosti [RIA News], 2013.4 oktyabrya.URL: http://ria.ru/ society/20131004/967783039.html#ixzz4BliMjbsh (Accessed 26.06.17).
  3. Glavnye professii po mneniyu zhitelei Rossii [Elektronnyi resurs] [The main profession in the opinion of the inhabitants of Russia].Press vypusk Levada-tsentr [Press release Levada Center], 2013.7 iyulya.URL: http://www.levada.ru/old/04-07-2013/glavnye-professii-po-mneniyu-zhitelei-rossii (Accessed 26.06.17)
  4.  Il’in V.A., Shabunova A.A., Leonidova G.V.Sotsial’noe polozhenie uchitel’stva v Rossii [Social Status of Teaching in Russia].Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2012, no.8, pp. 123–133.
  5. Kogan E.A.Udovletvorennost’ pedagogov rabotoi v obshcheobrazovatel’nykh shkolakh [Satisfaction of teachers with work in general schools].In Mansurov V.A.(ed.), Professionaly v epokhu reform: dinamika ideologii, statusa i tsennostei [Professionals in the era of reforms: the dynamics of ideology, status and values].Moscow: IS RAN, 2013, pp.291–298.
  6. Kolesnikova E.M.Publichnyi obraz professii uchitelya: opyty issledovaniya i vklad v statusnye pokazateli gruppy [Public image of the profession of the teacher: the research experience and contribution to the status indicators of the group].Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya sotsial’nye nauki [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. A series of social sciences], 2013.Vol.29, no.1, pp.28-34.
  7. Professiya «uchitel’»: vchera i segodnya[Elektronnyi resurs] [Profession “teacher”: yesterday and today].Press-vypusk [ Press release], 2016, no.3185 ot 26 avgusta.URL: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115829 (Accessed 26.06.17)
  8. Lenskoi E.(eds.), Rossiiskie pedagogi v zerkale mezhdunarodnogo sravnitel’nogo issledovaniya pedagogicheskogo korpusa (TALIS 2013) [Russian educators in the mirror of the international comparative study of the pedagogical corps (TALIS 2013)].Moscow: Publ.dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2015.
  9. Frumina I.D.(eds.), Rossiiskie uchitelya v svete issledovatel’skikh dannykh [Russian teachers in the light of research data].Moscow: Publ.dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016.
  10. Sobkin V., Adamchuk D.Kakie peremeny nuzhny sovremennomu obrazovaniyu.O professional’nom samochuvstvii shkol’nogo uchitelya [What changes are needed for modern education.On the professional health of the school teacher].Uchitel’skaya gazeta [Teacher’s newspaper], 2015, no.16 of April 21.
  11. Usloviya raboty i professional’noe samochuvstvie uchitelei v situatsii vvedeniya effektivnogo kontrakta.Informatsionnyi byulleten’.(Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya; № 1 (90)) [Conditions of work and professional well-being of teachers in the situation of the introduction of an effective contract.News bulletin.(Monitoring of the Economics of Education, No.1 (90)].Moscow: Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki», 2016.
  12. Uchitel’: prestizh professii i neobkhodimye kachestva.Kakim dolzhen byt’ sovremennyi uchitel’? Dolzhny li uchitelya vospityvat’ – ili tol’ko davat’ znaniya? [Elektronnyi resurs] [Teacher: the prestige of the profession and the necessary qualities.What should be the modern teacher? Should teachers educate – or only give knowledge?].FOM. Nauka i obrazovanie [FOM. Science and education], 2014.5 October.URL: http://fom.ru/Nauka-i-obrazovanie/11773 (Accessed 26.06.17)
  13. Fullan M.Vybor lozhnykh dvizhushchikh sil dlya reformy tselostnoi sistemy [The choice of false driving forces for the reform of the whole system].Voprosy obrazovaniya [ Educational Studies], 2011, no.4, pp. 79–105.
  14. Shafranov-Kutsev G.F.Mesto uchitel’stva v stratifikatsionnoi strukture sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva [The Place of Teaching in the Stratification Structure of Contemporary Russian Society].Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2016, no, 9, pp.65–72.
  15. Sheregi F.E.Pedagogi obshcheobrazovatel’nykh organizatsii: trud ili povinnost’? [Teachers of general education organizations: work or service?].Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [ Sociological Studies], 2016, no.1, pp.108–116.
  16. Yakovleva N.Obrazovatel’naya usluga ili uchitel’skoe sluzhenie? [Educational service or teaching ministry?].Rodina [Motherland], 2014, no.3, pp.62–63.
  17. 65% rossiyan ne khotyat, chtoby ikh deti stali uchitelyami [Elektronnyi resurs] [65% of Russians do not want their children to become teachers].Uchitel’skaya Gazeta [ Teacher’s Newspaper], 2014.12 november.URL: http://www.ug.ru/news/13422 (Accessed 26.06.17).
  18. Fuller C., Goodwyn A., Francis-Brophy E.Advanced skills teachers: professional identity and status .Teachers and Teaching, 2013.Vol 19, no.4.pp.463–474.
  19. Global Teacher Status Index.Dolton P., Marcenaro- Gutierrez O.(eds).London: Varkey GEMS Foundation, 2013.
  20. Hall D., Langton B.Perception of the status of the teachers.New Zealand: Ministry of Education, 2006.
  21. Hargreaves L., Cunningham M., Everton T., Hansen A., Hopper B., McIntyre D., Maddock M., Mukherjee J., Pell T., Rouse M., Turner P., Wilson L.The status of teachers and the teaching profession: Views from inside and outside the profession.Research Report 755.London: DfES, 2006.
  22. Hargreaves L., Flutter J. The Status of Teachers and the Teaching Profession: A desk-study for Education International.Unpublished manuscript, Department of Education, University of Cambridge, 2013.
  23. Symeonidis V.The status of teachers and the teaching profession a study of education unions’ perspectives.Brussels: Education International, Research Institute, 2015.
  24. Zarina S., Drelinga E., Iliško D., Krastiņa E.Teacher’s vocation and students’ attitudes towards a choice of teacher’s vocation.Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2016.Vol.I.May 27th – 28th, pp.265–274.

Information About the Authors

Margarita R. Husnutdinova, PhD in Sociology, Senior Researcher, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Contemporary Childhood, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-0230, e-mail: husnutdinovaMR@mgppu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3539
Previous month: 71
Current month: 28

Downloads

Total: 3221
Previous month: 8
Current month: 1