Emotional Attitude to School and Self-Attitude in High School Students of Different Sex and Age

The aim of this work was to study (taking into account gender and age) the relationship between emotional attitude to learning activity and self-attitude in high school students. The following parameters were revealed separately for groups of boys and girls: 1) the structure of the emotional attitude to the values of school life (by factor analysis of assessments obtained with the Semantic Differential scale); 2) the indicators of self-attitude (according to the technique by S.R. Pantileev); 3) the correlations between the selected factors and the parameters of self-attitude. The study involved students of 9—11 grades (14—17 years old) from two Moscow schools. A total of 346 people were surveyed; the subjects were divided into 4 groups: younger groups (8—9 grades, 14—15 years old) boys (73) and girls 76), older groups (grades 10—11, 16—17 years old) of boys (98) and girls (99); both techniques were used in 217 students: younger groups of boys (41) and girls (49), older groups boys (63) and girls (66).As it was found, with age there is a tendency to change the semantic content of some motives — for boys in the field of status motivation, and for girls in the field of learning motivation. In girls, various types of emotional and motivational attitudes toward learning are more consistent with the parameters of self-attitude. At the same time, among younger boys motivation of duty and recognition is closely related to self-attitude, whereas in older boys the latter is related only to learning and cognitive motivation.

1. Arkhireeva T.V.Vliyanie roditel’skogo vospitaniya na samootnoshenie mladshego shkol’nika [The influence of parenting on the self-attitude of a younger student].Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, 2006, no. 3, pp. 67—77.(In Russ.).
2. Bern Sh.Gendernaya psikhologiya: Per.s angl.[Gender Psychology].Moscow: Praym-Evroznak, 2004.320 p.(In Russ.).
3. Bozhovich L.I.Lichnost’ i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood].Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2009.400 p.(In Russ.).
4. Vartanova I.I.Izuchenie lichnosti podrostka v uchebnoi deyatel’nosti [The study of the personality of a teenager in educational activities].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2003.no.1, pp.8—14.(In Russ.).
5. Vartanova I.I.Spetsifika vzaimosvyazi emotsional’nogo i ponyatiinogo komponentov uchebnoi motivatsii [Specificity of the Relationship between Emotional and Conceptual Components of Educational Motivation].Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2018.Vol.14, no.2, pp.77—85.(In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).DOI: 10.17759/ chp.2018140208
6. Kon I.S.Psikhologiya starsheklassnika [High School Psychology].Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 1982.207 p.(In Russ.).
7. Kulagina I.Yu.Dominiruyuhchaya motivatsiya shkol’nikov: vozrastnye tendentsii i usloviya razvitiya [Dominant Motivation in Schoolchildren: Age Trends and Conditions of Development].Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2015.Vol. 11, no.3, pp.100—109.(In Russ., abstr.in Engl.).DOI: 10.17759/ chp.2015110309
8. Pantileev S.R.Metodika issledovaniya samootnosheniya [Methodology for the study of self-relationship].Moscow: «Smysl» Publ., 1993.32 p.(In Russ.).
9. Petrenko V.F.Vvedenie v eksperimental’nuyu psikhosemantiku.Issledovanie form reprezentatsii v obydennom soznanii.[Introduction to experimental psychosemantics.Study forms of representation in ordinary consciousness].Moscow: MGU Publ., 1983.175 p.(In Russ.).
10. Sambikina O.S.Detsko-roditel’skie otnosheniya kak faktor formirovaniya stilya uchebnoi deyatel’nosti podrostkov raznogo pola [Child-parent relations as a factor in the formation of the style of educational activity of adolescents of different sexes].In Fikhman A.A.(ed.), Tridtsat’ vtorye Merlinskie chteniya: Sposobnosti. Odarennost’. Individual’nost’: materialy vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Thirty second Merlin readings: Abilities. Giftedness. Individuality: materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conferenc] (Perm, October 20—21, 2017).Perm’: Permskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarno-pedagogicheskii universitet Publ., 2017, pp.150—153.(In Russ.).
11. Sobkin V.S., Kalashnikova E.A.Dinamika motivatsionno-tselevykh transformatsii uchebnoi deyatel’nosti u uchashchikhsya osnovnoi shkoly [Dynamics of motivational-targeted transformation of educational activity of students of basic school].Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, 2015, no.3, pp. 3—15.(In Russ.; abstr.in Engl.).
12. Stolin V.V.Samosoznanie lichnosti [Self-identity].Moscow: MGU Publ., 1983.284 p.(In Russ.).
13. Dweck C S., Bush E.S.Sex differences in learned helplessness: I.Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators.Developmental Psychology, 1978.Vol. 11, pp.147—156.
14. Garanina Zh., Balyaev S., Ionova M.The Role of Self-Attitude in the Personal and Professional Development of High School Students.The Education and science journal, 2019.Vol.21, pp.82—96.DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2019-1-82-96.
15. Vartanova I.I.Motivations of high school students of different sex and age.Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2018.Vol.11, no.3, pp.209—224.

PlumX

article metrics