Psychological Well-Being of Gifted Teenagers with Different Levels of Creativity

The article substantiates and verifies the hypothesis of the relationship between psychological well-being of gifted teenagers and the features of their creativity.It considers the specifics of psychological well-being in gifted adolescents with different levels of creativity, their attitude to the educational environment, the level of satisfaction with its significant characteristics and the degree of protection from psychological violence.The study was conducted on a sample of students of grades 8—10 of schools specializing in mathematics and natural science.The total number of subjects was 253 students aged 14—17 years (154 boys, 99 girls).The study used the following techniques: the Psychological Well-Being Scale by С.Ryff, the Ingenuity and Divergent Thinking scales from H.Zivert’s test of verbal creativity, and the questionnaire “Psychological Safety of Educational Environment” by I.A.Baeva.The differences in psychological well-being indicators for adolescents with different levels of verbal creativity were identified: in particular, adolescents with high creativity have a lower indicator of “positive relationships with others”.The structure of correlations between psychological well–being and creativity in groups of adolescents with high and low creativity differs.Highly creative gifted teenagers tend to evaluate their condition as less favourable as compared to their peers with low creativity and struggle with establishing close relationships.Adolescents with low creativity are more satisfied with such characteristics of educational environment as relationships with others and opportunities provided by the environment.Their assessment of protection from psychological violence is negatively correlated with originality of thinking.

1. Avdeeva L.N., Shirvanyan A.E., Yashutkin V.A.Sootnoshenie ponyatii «Tvorchestvo» i «Odarennost’» [The relationship between the concepts of “creativity” and “giftedness”].Psikhologiya tvorchestva i odarennosti. Materialy vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g.Moskva, 20—21 aprelya 2018 g.) [Psychology of creativity and giftedness. Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference].Moscow: MGPU, 2018, pp.56—60.(In Russ.).
2. Baeva I.A., Volkova E.N., Laktionova E.B.Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’noi sredy: razvitie lichnosti [Psychological security of the educational environment: personal development].Baeva I.A.(ed.).Moscow: Publ.«Nestor-Istoriya», 2011.272 p.(In Russ.).
3. Balash A.V., Topoeva E.Yu.Osobennosti psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya starshikh podrostkov s priznakami odarennosti [Features of psychological well-being of gifted teenagers].Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya = Herald of Science and Education, 2020, no.1(79), pp.101—105.(In Russ.).
4. Vodyakha S.A.Kreativnost’ starsheklassnikov kak prediktor psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya v shkole [Creativity of senior secondary school children as a predictor of the school psychological well-being].Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2015, no.6, pp.91—95.(In Russ.).
5. Vodyakha S.A.Prediktory psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov [Predictors of students‘ psychological well-being].Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2013, no.1, pp.70—74.(In Russ.).
6. Druzhinin V.N.Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostei [Psychology of General abilities].Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2007.368 p.(In Russ.).
7. Zivert Kh.Testirovanie lichnosti [Personality testing].2nd izd.Per.with German.Moscow: «Interekspert» JSC, 1998, pp.80—100.
8. Kochkina O.E.Vzaimosvyaz’ psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya i kreativnosti v starshem shkol’nom vozraste.Obrazovanie i nauka v sovremennykh realiyakh [The relationship between psychological well-being and creativity in high school].In Shirokov O.N.(eds.), Sbornik materialov Shestoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g.Cheboksary, 26 fevralya 2018 g.) [Education and science in modern realities. Volume of proceedings of the Sixth International Scientific and Practical Conference], 2018, pp.72—73.(In Russ.).
9. Krushel’nitskaya O.B.Podrostok v sisteme referentnykh otnoshenii [Adolescent in the system of referent relations].Moscow: MPSI, 2008.208 p.(In Russ.).
10. Leontiev D.A., Osin E.N., Dosumova S.Sh., Rzaeva F.R., Bobrov V.V.Perezhivaniya v uchebnoy deyatel’nosti i ikh svyaz’ s psikhologicheskim blagopoluchiyem [Study-Related Experiences and Their Association with Psychological Well-Being].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2018.Vol.23, no.6, pp.55—66.DOI:10.17759/pse.2018230605.(In Russ.).
11. Martynenko E.V., Matvienko V.V.Ponyatie i kontseptual’nye osnovy kreativnosti kak tvorcheskie sposobnosti individa: struktura odarennosti [The conception and conceptual basis of creativity as an individual’s ability: structure of giftedness].Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = Actual problems of natural and humanitarian sciences, 2013, no.5, pp.410—414.(In Russ.).
12. Matyushkin A.M.Kontseptsiya tvorcheskoi odarennosti [The concept of creative giftedness].Voprosy psikhologii = Psychology Issues, 1989, no.6, pp.29—33.(In Russ.).
13. Melik-Pashaev A.A.Khudozhestvennaya odarennost’ detei, ee vyyavlenie i razvitie [Artistic talent of children: its identification and development].Melik-Pashaev A.A.(eds.).Dubna: Feniks+, 2006.112 p.(In Russ.).
14. Miklyaeva A.V., Khoroshikh V.V., Volkova E.N.Sub”ektivnye faktory psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya odarennykh podrostkov: teoreticheskaya model’ [Subjective factors of psychological well-being of gifted adolescents: a theoretical model].Science for Education Today, 2019.Vol.9, no.4, pp.36—55.(In Russ.).
15. Molchanov S.V., Almazova O.V., Poskrebysheva N.N.Moral’nyye suzhdeniya podrostkov s raznym urovnem psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya [Moral Judgments in Adolescents with Different Levels of Psychological Well-Being].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019.Vol.24, no. 4, pp.22—35.DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240402.(In Russ.).
16. Pevzner M.N., Petryakov P.A., Shirin A.G.Odarennost’ kak pedagogicheskaya problema i obrazovatel’nyi vyzov: vzglyad rossiiskikh uchenykh [Giftedness as a pedagogical problem and educational challenge: the view of Russian scientists].Podderzhka odarennosti — razvitie kreativnosti: materialy mezhdunarodnogo kongressa (g. Vitebsk, 22-27.09.2014) [Supporting giftedness — developing creativity: proceedings of the international congress].Vitebsk: VGU im.P.M.Masherova, 2014.Vol. 1, pp.21—29.(In Russ.).
17. Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti [Operational concept of giftedness].Bogoyavlenskaya D.B.(eds.).2-e izd., rassh.i pererab.Moscow: Ministerstvo obrazovaniya RF, 2003.95 p.(In Russ.).
18. Tunik E.E.Luchshie testy na kreativnost’.Diagnostika tvorcheskogo myshleniya [Best tests for creativity: diagnostics of creative thinking].Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2013.320 p.(In Russ.).
19. Shcheblanova E.I., Tsoi A.B.Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya odarennykh uchashchikhsya s raznymi vidami intellektual’nykh sposobnostei [Social and psychological adjustment of gifted students with different kinds of intellectual abilities].Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Psychological Studies, 2013.Vol. 6, no.31, p.7.URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed: 17.06.2020).(In Russ.).
20. Bergold S., Wirthwein L., Rost D., Steinmayr R.Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers? Frontiers in Psychology, 2015.Vol.6, p.1623.
21. Besancon M., Fenouillet F., Shankland R.Influence of school environment on adolescents’ creative potential, motivation and well-being.Learning and Individual Differences, 2015.Vol.43, pp.178—184.
22. Csikszentmihalyi M.Culture, time and development of talent.In M.Csikszentmihalyi, R.E.Robinson.Conception of giftedness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp.264—284.
23. Gardner H.Creativity lives and creative works: a synthetic scientific approach.In R.Sternberg, T.Tardif (eds.).The nature of creativity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp.298—324.
24. Gebart-Eaglemont J.E., Foddy M.Creative potential and the sociometric status of children.Creativity Research Journal, 1994.Vol.7(1), pp.47—57.DOI:10.1080/10400419409534508
25. Kroesbergen E.H., Hooijdornk M., Van Viersen S., Middel-Lalleman M., Reijnbers J.The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children.Gifted Child Quarterly, 2016.Vol.60—1, pp.16—30.
26. Lau S., Li C.S., Chu D.Perceived creativity: Its relationship to social status and self-concept among Chinese high ability children.Creativity Research Journal, 2004.Vol.16(1), pp.59—67.DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_6
27. Neihart M.The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 1999.Vol.22-1, pp.10—17.
28. Richards Ruth.Everyday creativity in the classroom.In Ronald A.Beghetto & James C.Kaufman (Eds).Nurturing creativity in the classroom.UK Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp.206—234.
29. Ryff С., Keyes С.The structure of psychological well-being revisited.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995.Vol.69(4), pp.719—727.

PlumX

article metrics