Subjective Well-being of Teachers in Contemporary Situation: Emotional, Personal and Metacognitive Predictors

This study aims to comprehensively explore the emotional, personal, and metacognitive predictors of the psychological well-being of teachers. The article presents the results of identifying personality traits, features of the emotional sphere and regulation of emotions, as well as features of metacognition that can influence well-being of teachers in modern conditions. To measure these characteristics, the following methods were used: a short portrait questionnaire of the Big Five; methodology “Differential Scale of Emotions”; methodology for diagnosing the subjective well-being of the individual; Metacognitive Awareness Inventory; test “Differential Type of Reflection”; Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the author's self-assessment questionnaire of metacognitive behavior “Metacognitive Skills in the Structure of Educational and Professional Activities”. Study sample: 106 people aged 20 to 75 years (average age 45,85) – teachers, lecturers, heads of departments of higher educational institutions and colleges. It is shown that the higher levels of metacognitive involvement correspond to the higher levels of subjective well-being. A high index of positive emotions, higher levels of trait conscientiousness and conscious use of metacognitive skills, positive revision and acceptance strategies, and lower acute negative emotions index also have a positive effect. The results described can be helpful in preventative and therapeutic work with the symptoms of professional burnout of teachers.

Introduction

Pedagogical activity places considerable demands on the teacher's personality and is classified as a profession with an elevated risk of burnout and emotional exhaustion [9, 18, 20]. Concurrently,  there is an active development of the psychological safety discourse within educational environments with a growing focus on the psychological component, particularly concerning the well-being of participants in the educational process [2]. While research on student well-being has been more extensively explored quantitatively, the psychological characteristics of teaching activity, especially at the college and higher school levels, remain largely underdeveloped [7, 25, 30]. Nevertheless, the significance and potential impact of teachers in the educational process cannot be overstated. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the quality of education is significantly influenced by the competence of teachers and educators, and students' motivation and performance are correlated with the psychological characteristics and well-being of teachers [1, 28, 30, 21, 22, 23].

Currently, we are experiencing a unique situation marked by continuous and profound socio-economic and political transformations in our country, which act as both stressors and catalysts for personal transformation. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the format of the educational process has undergone significant changes. Distance or hybrid learning is coupled with complete or partial absence from the workplace, alterations in forms of knowledge assessment, and challenges in emotional communication. These changes often introduce additional problems in solving routine tasks, potentially leading to a decline in educational motivation and student performance, thereby negatively impacting their well-being [2; 6; 16]. For teachers, a notable consequence of this format shift has been the challenges in communication and the blurring of boundaries in contact with students [6; 11; 13]. The heightened overall anxiety levels among students make them more insistent on prompt feedback from teachers, such as quickly obtaining clarifications, discussing challenges, certification issues, and gaining points. This increased demand for swift communication may serve as an additional source of stress, contributing to emotional exhaustion [7; 24].

Contemporary scientific consensus affirms that the subjective well-being of teachers is intricately linked to their professional endeavors. The efficacy, motivation, and ability of teachers to foster optimal learning conditions hinge on their emotional state and satisfaction levels [12; 20; 30]. Furthermore, recent literature extensively explores the correlation between well-being and "positive" personality traits within the affective sphere. It has been established that well-being is reliably connected to successful adaptation in the workplace, stress levels, coping mechanisms, emotional regulation, and the effectiveness of teachers' professional activities [7; 11; 12; 30]. The well-being of teachers exhibits significant variation based on gender, with a noted association between women's well-being and the intensity of the conflict arising from balancing household responsibilities and work in education [15]. Prominent negative factors, often leading to attrition from the profession, encompass high social responsibility, elevated stress and emotional involvement, instantaneous feedback, a competitive team environment, rigorous demands across various teaching activities, and standardization of performance metrics [26]. Skills related to self-organization, "meta-resources," and personal traits like awareness, hard work, curiosity, energy, and optimism are increasingly recognized as supportive factors for well-being [12; 21; 27; 29]. In the work of I.V. Morosanova, "meta-resource" pertains to conscious self-regulation and the rational utilization of individual resources, facilitating effective planning, organization, and goal achievement in personal development and self-realization across diverse domains [10].

In the broader context, metacognitive skills, encompassing the ability to define goals, plan, analyze processes, and evaluate the outcomes of one's cognitive activities, play a pivotal role in preventing and correcting emotional burnout among teachers [8]. Moreover, a high level of metacognitive skills development is reliably linked to the formation of constructive coping mechanisms in navigating challenging life situations, as well as overcoming dysfunctional and addictive behavior [14; 17; 19].

Therefore, the relevance of studying the subjective well-being of teachers arises from the imperative to ensure psychological safety within educational institutions. This issue is especially pressing in the aftermath of the changes wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic, acting as stressors for all participants in the educational process, which could adversely impact the overall quality of education. Existing studies on the well-being of teachers primarily focus on examining connections with various personality traits or individual psychological facets of professional activity, either neglecting the influence of metacognitive skills and the emotional sphere or considering them exclusively as independent variables. This limitation impedes a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms governing the formation and maintenance of a high level of well-being. Subjective well-being is regarded as a multifaceted and multidimensional construct that integrates an affective component, an individual's assessment, and their attitude toward their own life and personality [4; 30]. Drawing on the aforementioned research results and theoretical generalizations, we conclude that an individual's subjective well-being is intricately entwined with their personal characteristics, emotional sphere, and the development of metacognitive skills. We hypothesize that these characteristics can be deemed significant predictors of the level of well-being.

The aim of this study was to identify a complex of emotional, personal, and metacognitive predictors of teachers' subjective well-being.

Methods

The study involved 106 participants (68% women) aged between 20 and 75 years, with an average age of 45.85. Participants included teachers, lecturers, and heads of departments from higher educational institutions and colleges in the Southern Federal District of the Russian Federation. Approximately 67% of the sample had a background in higher education, with professional experience spanning 3 to 39 years, and 74% having over a decade of experience in the field of education. Data collection occurred through electronic testing from March 15 to April 18, 2022. All participants provided informed consent, were apprised of the study's objectives, and were informed about the subsequent use and publication of results.

To elucidate socio-psychological characteristics and assess metacognitive skills, we used a survey method. Participants reported gender, age, education level, position, work experience in education, and rated the severity of professional stress and coping success on a 10-point scale.

Psychological testing encompassed personal characteristics, emotional sphere traits, and metacognitive behavior, utilizing various methods: Short Portrait Questionnaire of the Big Five (B5-10, M.S. Egorova and O.V. Parshikova, 2016; 10 statements (answers were scored on 6- point scale, where 1 is not at all like me, and 6 is very similar to me), 5 scales by factors, for each scale the sum of points on direct and reverse questions was assessed, min 2 points, max 12 points; Cronbach's α >0.5); Methodology Scale of Differential Emotions (DSE, adaptation by A.V. Leonova and M.S. Kapitsa, 2003; 30 adjectives describing emotional experiences, answers were rated on a 5-point scale, where 1 - no experience at all, and 5 - experience expressed to the maximum extent), 10 scales of enlarged emotions, for each scale the sum of points was assessed, min. 3 points, max. 15 points); method for diagnosing the subjective well-being of an individual (R.M. Shamionov, T.V. Beskova, 2018; 34 statements (answers were assessed on a 5-point scale, where 1 - completely disagree, and 5 - completely agree), 5 scales by type of well-being , for each scale, not the sum of points was assessed, but the average value, min 1 point, max 5 points; Cronbach's α>0.75); questionnaire of metacognitive involvement in activity (G. Schrow, R. Dennison, adaptation by A.V. Karpov, 1994; 52 statements (answers were assessed on a 5-point scale, where 1 - completely disagree, and 5 - completely agree), the overall total points, min 52 points, max 260 points); Self-assessment scale of metacognitive behavior (D. LaCosta, adapted by A.V. Karpov, 1998; 12 strategies (answers were assessed on a 5-point scale, where 1 is very rarely, and 5 is very often), the total score was assessed, min. 12 points, max 60 points); test Differential type of reflection (D.A. Leontyev, E.M. Lapteva, E.N. Osin, A.Zh. Salikhova, 2009; 30 statements (answers were assessed on a 4-point scale, where 1 – no, and 4 – yes), 3 scales by types of reflection, for each scale the sum of points was assessed according to the key, on the Systemic Reflection scale min. 12 points, max. 48 points, on the Introspection and Quasi-reflection scales min. 9 points, max 36 points, Cronbach's α from 0.78 to 0.85); questionnaire “Cognitive regulation of emotions” by N. Garnefsky and V. Craig (adapted by O.L. Pisareva, 2007; 36 statements (answers were assessed on a 5-point scale, where 1 is never, and 5 is always), 9 scales in accordance with the main ways of cognitive regulation of emotions, for each scale the sum of points was assessed according to the key, min 4 points, max 20 points; Cronbach's α from 0.7 to 0.87).

Additionally, to investigate metacognitive characteristics, we employed the author’s self-assessment questionnaire of metacognitive behavior Metacognitive Skills in the Structure of Educational and Professional Activities. This questionnaire consisted of 9 questions designed to evaluate the utilization and awareness of key forms of metacognitive behavior, including metaplanning, procedural skills, and metacognitive control [3].

The statistical methods employed for processing the acquired results included the Shapiro-Wilk test, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc analysis utilizing Dunn's method, along with Student's t-test. The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the freely available JASP Computer software package (Version 0.16, 2021).

The data analysis procedure unfolded across several stages:

In the initial stage, questionnaire data and the outcomes of descriptive statistics calculations were scrutinized to provide an overarching characterization of the studied sample.

Subsequently, as a preliminary analysis and to determine a fixed factor for covariance analysis, differences in the subjective well-being of respondents were assessed based on metacognitive acceleration skills, metacognitive involvement, and systemic reflection. This involved one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Dunn’s post-hoc test, and Student’s t-test.

In the third stage, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to explore predictors of teachers' subjective well-being. The level of metacognitive involvement served as a factor, while the awareness of metacognitive skills and emotional and personal characteristics were considered as covariates.

The choice of ANCOVA over regression analysis was motivated by the study's aim, which involved examining a substantial number of factors presumed to influence well-being. The emotions, personality traits and metacognitions according to previous studies, including our own data, are significantly and closely correlated. Additionally, since metacognitive involvement had five levels of expression, regression analysis could potentially complicate result interpretation and necessitate additional analytical steps to control for covariates. In ANCOVA, we utilized a third type of sums of squares, enabling the consideration of both the interaction between the factor and covariates and the relationships among the covariates.

Results

The majority of respondents perceive a significant number of stressful situations at work, with a sample average of 5.30 out of 10 points. Remarkably, they generally handle the workload well, rating it at 7.87 out of 10 points. Interestingly, there appears to be an inverse linear relationship between self-assessed professional stress and subjective perceptions of academic success, as illustrated in Figure 1. Respondents who report low levels of professional stress tend to provide higher ratings for coping with the workload, while those who rate their professional stress higher are more likely to indicate lower coping ratings.

Figure 1. Analysis of the survey results on the severity of professional stress and success in coping with workload.

Examining the key indicators of subjective well-being (see Table 1), the highest scores were observed on the social-normative well-being scale, with an average value of 4.11 points. This value corresponds to a high level on the scale, suggesting that respondents generally perceive their lives as aligning with social norms and moral values. The lowest scores were on the hedonic well-being scale (3.43); however, these values fall within the normative range for well-being components. The empirical averages on the scales of emotional well-being (3.76), ego-well-being (3.62), and existential-activity well-being (3.68) also align with normative ranges. The overall indicator of subjective well-being is at an average level, portraying the sample positively.

Table 1. Main indicators of subjective well-being (N=106)

Testing for the normality of the distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that, for the sample as a whole, most indicators of subjective well-being follow a normal distribution. A similar pattern was observed for the aggregated characteristics of metacognition (metacognitive involvement and the level of development of metacognitive skills). However, for most indicators of the emotional sphere, the distribution in the sample deviates from normal (Shapiro-Wilk p < 0.05). It is important to note that there were no extremely high or low values in the sample, and all average values fall within the normative range according to the methods employed. Therefore, further parametric methods will be employed for the analysis of differences.

To investigate the assumption that metacognitive components of teachers' activities may act as supporting factors for teachers' subjective well-being, a comparative analysis of well-being levels in subgroups of teachers with different levels of metacognitive skills development, metacognitive involvement, and systemic reflection was conducted. The results suggest that the highest level of subjective well-being in the teacher sample is associated with elevated levels of metacognitive skills, metacognitive involvement, and systemic reflection (Fig. 2). The distribution of comparison groups is outlined below:

1. According to the level of development of metacognitive skills: group 2 (reduced level) – 2 people, women; group 3 (intermediate level) – 18 people, of which 50% are women; group 3 (increased level) – 59 people, of which 72% were women; group 5 (high level) – 27 people, 85% of them are women. No low level was detected in the sample.
2. According to the level of systemic reflection: group 2 (average level) – 25 people, of which 64% are women; group 3 (high level) – 81 people, of which 75% were women. No low level was detected in the sample.
3. According to the level of metacognitive involvement: group 4 (increased level) – 50 people, 66% of them are women; group 5 (high level) – 56 people, of which 78% are women. Low, reduced and average levels were not identified in the sample.

Fig. 2. Analysis of the impact of metacognitive skills, systemic reflection, and metacognitive involvement on subjective well-being

Given the uneven distribution of respondents across groups based on the level of metacognitive skills and the results of the normality test (Shapiro-Wilk p = 0.149), we opted for a one-way analysis of variance without excluding of the smaller groups, but with conducting a post hoc analysis using Dunn's method for pairwise comparisons. Significant differences were observed only when comparing the high level (level 5 in the figure) with other groups (ANOVA and Dunn's post-hoc test, p<0.001). No significant differences were found in the level of systemic reflection (Student's t-test at p=0.338). However, significant differences were noted based on the level of metacognitive involvement (Student's t-test at p<0.001). Since these differences highlight variations in well-being between individuals with high and elevated levels of metacognitive involvement, we hypothesized that this indicator was the most effective in discriminating the sample as the primary factor. Notably, in our previous study using a similar protocol on a student sample, which identified three levels (medium, increased, and high), metacognitive involvement was also a significant factor [4].

To examine the predictors of teachers' subjective well-being, we employed analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The level of metacognitive involvement served as the primary factor, while the awareness of metacognitive skills and emotional and personal characteristics were considered as covariates (Table 2).

Table 2. Results of ANCOVA covariance analysis of predictors of teachers' subjective well-being

The analysis revealed significant effects from the consciousness index (F=4.71, p<0.033), index of positive emotions (F=17.05, p<0.001), index of acute negative emotions (F=12.17, p<0.001), degree of awareness of using metacognitive skills (F=5.15, p<0.026), adoption strategy (F=6.32, p=0.014), and positive revision (F=4.17, p<0.044). Trends toward a significant effect were observed for openness to experience (F=3.01, p=0.086) and the index of anxious-depressive emotions (F=3.80, p=0.055). It's noteworthy that the effect size indicates a small effect for all significant effects, except for the index of positive emotions (medium effect, η²=0.12).

When scrutinizing the influence of personal characteristics, emotional sphere traits, and awareness of metacognitive skills, higher subjective well-being rates were observed among teachers with high levels of consciousness, positive emotions, and low values of acute negative emotions. Well-being was also associated with coping strategies such as acceptance and positive revision (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Analysis of the influence of personal characteristics, characteristics of the emotional sphere and awareness of the use of metacognitive skills

Discussion

The presented research highlights the substantial role of personal traits, emotional states, and metacognitive skills in sustaining a heightened level of subjective well-being among teachers. Consistent with previous studies, the positive influence of conscientiousness aligns with the supporting impact of positive personality traits on well-being and professional success [12; 21; 27; 29]. The finding related to the positive effect of conscientiousness, along with the identified trend in openness to experience, is in harmony with modern research conducted on samples not exclusive to teachers and students but also encompassing professionals from diverse fields [30]. However, the anticipated significant effects of extraversion and neuroticism on well-being were not established. This might be attributed to the unique nature of covariance analysis construction, which allows for the measurement of each variable's distinctive contribution after accounting for the influence of correlations between predictor variables. Despite the possibility of correlations between covariates and the dependent variable, we consider this method the most precise and essential, given the frequent correlation between personality traits and emotional sphere characteristics.

Previous theoretical and empirical studies on teacher samples have extensively explored the connection between subjective well-being and emotions, including emotional and professional burnout [12; 20; 30]. Our results regarding emotional regulation, specifically the positive impact of positive and acute negative emotions and the identified trend in the index of anxious-depressive emotions, also align with existing literature [7; 17; 30]. And while the subjective assessment of experienced emotions does not equate to the well-being construct, it likely stands as one of the most significant factors, providing individuals with information about their condition when evaluating their well-being level.

The presented model is likely specific to the teacher sample, differing from the model derived from a student sample in our previous work [4]. Despite apparent similarities, especially in the direction of effects, it is noteworthy that the awareness of using metacognitive skills becomes particularly crucial for teachers. This outcome is unsurprising, considering that both the level of development and awareness of metacognitive skills may be associated with respondents' age (the average age of teachers in the sample is 20 years higher). Moreover, these distinctions could arise from professional activity characteristics and other factors, such as length of service.

In conclusion, the results align with existing well-being concepts and empirical research across various samples. The intrinsic value and scientific novelty of these findings lie in their ability to elucidate how the metacognitive component integrates into the known structure of personal factors and which cognitive emotion regulation strategies most effectively contribute to teachers' subjective well-being. A notable limitation of this work is the lack of consideration for job satisfaction and burnout indicators, as well as the absence of a comparative analysis based on gender, age, and length of professional activity. Addressing and analyzing these factors constitute promising avenues for further exploration of the discussed topic.

Conclusions

The study aimed to comprehensively investigate emotional, personal, and metacognitive predictors of teachers' subjective well-being. The findings generally affirm the initial hypothesis, underscoring that personality traits, emotional parameters, and metacognition can serve as predictors of well-being. The highest level of subjective well-being among teachers is associated with elevated levels of metacognitive skills, metacognitive involvement, and systemic reflection.

Covariance analysis results, considering variable interactions, lead to the conclusion that teachers experience significantly higher subjective well-being when they possess a high index of positive emotions. Additionally, a substantial impact is observed with a heightened sense of responsibility and organization (consciousness), increased awareness of metacognitive skills, a prevalence of positive emotions, and the ability to constructively engage with one's emotions—finding gratitude in challenging situations and utilizing it for developmental purposes (acceptance and positive revision). A high index of acute negative emotions exhibits destructive potential.

The study's outcomes can address burnout prevention, enhance well-being, and support the professional development of teachers in secondary education and higher education. Raising awareness about the use of metacognitive skills and fostering constructive strategies for cognitive emotion regulation will contribute to sustaining subjective satisfaction amid changing socio-political and economic conditions.

1. Altynnikova N.V., Dorofeev A.V., Musaev A.A., Sagitov S.T. Upravlenie kachestvom pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya na osnove diagnostiki professional'nyh deficitov uchitelya: teoretiko-metodicheskij aspect [Quality management of pedagogical education based on the diagnosis of professional teacher deficits: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2022, no. 1(27), pp. 65–81. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270106 (In Russ.).
2. Baeva I.A. Model' psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti podrostka v obrazovatel'noj srede [Model of psychological safety of a teenager in an educational environment]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena [Izvestia of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen], 2019, no. 194, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.).
3. Denisova E.G. Razrabotka ankety samootsenki metakognitivnogo povedeniya «Metakognitivnyye navyki v strukture uchebno-professional'noy deyatel'nosti» [Development of a self-assessment questionnaire for metacognitive behavior "Metacognitive skills in the educational and professional activities"]. Innovatsionnaya nauka: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Defektologiya [Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology]. 2022. Vol. 5(2), pp. 6–24. DOI:10.23947/2658-7165-2022-5-2-6-24 (In Russ.).
4. Denisova E.G., Ermakov P.N., Abakumova I.V., Sylka N.V. Emotsional'no-lichnostnyye i metakognitivnyye prediktory psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Emotions, Personality Traits and Metacognitions as Predictors of Students’ Psychological Well-being in Contemporary Situation]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2022. Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 85–96. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270507 (In Russ.).
5. Lazareva O.V. K voprosu o vliyanii metakognitivnyh processov na ponimanie nauchnogo teksta [On the question of the influence of metacognitive processes on the understanding of a scientific text]. Psihofiziologiya [Psychology. Psychophysiology], 2012, no. 31, pp. 13–17. (In Russ.).
6. Lifshic M.V. Osobennosti mezhlichnostnoj kommunikacii studenta i prepodavatelya v situacii distancionnogo obucheniya [Features of interpersonal communication between a student and a teacher in a distance learning situation]. Distancionnye tekhnologii v professional'nom psihologicheskom obrazovanii, psihologii i psihoanalize. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (CHOUVO «Vostochno-Evropejskij Institut psihoanaliza», 2019) [Distance technologies in professional psychological education, psychology and psychoanalysis. Collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the International scientific and practical conference (Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis, 2019)]. Saint Petersburg: VEIP, 2020, pp. 22–28. (In Russ.).
7. Manina V.A., Petrakova A.V., Kulikova A.A., Orel E.A., Kanonir T.N. Koping-strategii i udovletvorennost' rabotoj u uchitelej v usloviyah distancionnogo prepodavaniya vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 [Coping strategies and job satisfaction among teachers in the conditions of distance teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie[Psychological science and education], 2023, no. 28(1), pp. 52–65. DOI:10.17759/pse.2023000001 (In Russ.).
8. Molchanova L.N., Kuznecova A.A. Refleksivno-smysovaya regulyaciya sostoyaniya psihicheskogo vygoraniya u pedagogov special'nogo korrekcionnogo obrazovatel'nogo uchrezhdeniya i ocenivanie ee effektivnosti [Reflexive and semantic regulation of the state of mental burnout among teachers of a special correctional educational institution and evaluation of its effectiveness]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Perspectives of Science and Education], 2019, no. 2(38), pp. 212–228. DOI:10.32744/pse.2019.2.16 (In Russ.).
9. Morozova G.K. Sovremennye trebovaniya, pred"yavlyaemye k lichnosti pedagoga [Modern requirements imposed on the personality of a teacher]. Psihologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya [Psychology and pedagogy: methodology and problems of practical application], 2014, no. 40, pp. 41–44. (In Russ.).
10. Morosanova V.I. Osoznannaya samoregulyaciya kak metaresurs dostizheniya celej i razresheniya problem zhiznedeyatel'nosti [Conscious self-regulation as a meta-resource for achieving goals and solving life problems]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology], 2021, no. 1, pp. 4– (In Russ.).
11. Petrakova A.V., Kanonir T.N., Kulikova A.A., Orel E.A. Osobennosti psihologicheskogo stressa u uchitelej v usloviyah distancionnogo prepodavaniya vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 [Features of psychological stress in teachers in the conditions of distance teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2021, no. 1, pp. 93– DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-93-114 (In Russ.).
12. Rean A.A., Stavcev A.A., Kuz'min R.G. Sil'nye storony lichnosti v modeli VIA kak mediator psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya v professional'noj deyatel'nosti [Personality strengths in the VIA model as a mediator of psychological well-being in professional activity]. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2022, no. 2(46), pp. 25–34. DOI:10.11621/npj.2022.0203 (In Russ.).
13. Cener T.S., Oshkina A.V. Osobennosti obucheniya v onlajn-formate v vysshej shkole v forsirovannyh usloviyah [Features of online education in higher education in forced conditions]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2020, no. 5-3, pp. 170–177. DOI:10.24411/2500-1000-2020-10576 (In Russ.).
14. Ağaç M., Üzar-Özçetin Ye.S. Psychological Resilience, Metacognitions, and Fear of Recurrence Among Cancer Survivors and Family Caregivers. Cancer Nursing, 2022. Vol. 2, no. 45, pp. P. E454–E462. DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000973
15. Akram M.F., Ch. Abid Hussain. Relationship of Work-Family Conflict with Job Demands, Social Support and Psychological Well-Being of University Female Teachers in Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 2020. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 45–
16. Cao W., Fang Z., Hou G., Han M., Xu X., Dong J., Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 2020, pp. 112934. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934
17. Casale S., Fioravanti G., Spada M.M. Modelling the contribution of metacognitions and expectancies to problematic smartphone use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2021. Vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 788– DOI:10.1556/2006.2021.00066
18. de Souza J.C., de Sousa I.C., Belísio A.S., de Azevedo C.V.M. Sleep habits, daytime sleepiness and sleep quality of high school teachers. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 257–263. DOI:10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.17
19. Hansmeier J., Haberkamp A., Glombiewski J.A., Exner C. Metacognitive Change During Exposure and Metacognitive Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2021, pp. 12:722782. DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722782
20. Harmsen R., Helms-Lorenz M., Maulana R., van Veen K. The relationship between beginning teachers’ stress causes, stress responses, teaching behaviour and attrition. Teachers and Teaching, 2018. Vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 626– DOI:10.1080/13540602.2018.1465404
21. Klusmann U., Kunter M., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Baumert J. Teachers' occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008. Vol. 3, no. 100, pp. 702–715. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.702
22. Li-Grining C., Raver C.C., Champion K., Sardin L., Metzger M.W., Jones S.M. Understanding and improving classroom emotional climate in the “real world”: The role of teachers' psychosocial stressors. Early Education and Development, 2010, no. 21, pp. 65–94. DOI:10.1080/10409280902783509
23. McLean L., Connor C.M. Depressive Symptoms in Third-Grade Teachers: Relations to Classroom Quality and Student Achievement. Child development, 2015, pp. 86: 945– DOI:10.1111/cdev.12344
24. Rawat N.S., Choudhary K.C. Coping Strategies with Stress and Anxiety of Tri-Pillar of the Education System in COVID-19 Pandemic Period. Social Science Research Network, 2020. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3596912
25. Richter E., Lazarides R., Richter D. Four reasons for becoming a teacher educator: A large-scale study on teacher educators’ motives and well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2021. Vol. 102, pp. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103322
26. Ryan S.V., Embse N., Pendergast L.L., Saeki E., Segool N.K., Schwing S. Leaving the teaching profession: The role of teacher stress and educational accountability policies on turnover intent. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, no. 66, pp. 1– DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.016
27. Tarrasch R., Berger R., Grossman D. Mindfulness and compassion as key factors in improving teacher’s well-being. Mindfulness, 2020. Vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1049–1061. DOI:10.1007/s12671-020-01304-x
28. Tchoshanov M., Cruz M.D., Huereca K., Shakirova K., Shakirova L., Ibragimova E.N. Examination of lower secondary mathematics teachers’ content knowledge and its connection to students’ performance. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 2017. Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 683–702. DOI:10.1007/s10763-015-9703-9
29. Viac C., Fraser P. "Teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis", OECD Education Working Papers. OECD Publishing, 2020, no. 213. DOI:10.1787/c36fc9d3-en
30. Zhang L., Chen J., Li X. et al. A Scope Review of the Teacher Well-being Research Between 1968 and 2021. Asia-Pacific Edu Research, 2023. DOI:10.1007/s40299-023-00717-1