Enhancing Chess Education through Interactive Teaching Strategies: A Comprehensive Approach

This study aims to identify the correlation between interactive teaching strategies and chess teaching effectiveness in Armenian primary schools. Traditional chess teaching methods often involve rote memorization and abstract rules, while interactive strategies emphasize active learning and practical application of learned knowledge. The authors advocate the inclusion of interactive methods in chess education, such as heuristic conversation, the use of information and communication technologies, modeling, collaborative learning, problem solving, and reflection. The article examines various empirical studies and theoretical approaches that support the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies in developing critical thinking, active student participation, and knowledge retention. 476 students of 5th grade from 42 schools of Armenia (50,2% male) took part in the study, they had learned chess in previous three years (in 2-4th grade). The study's results demonstrate that all indicators of interactivity, according to students' perceptions, significantly correlated with the results of the chess test. Analysis of the results allows us to confirm the hypothesis about the correlation between interactive learning strategies and the effectiveness of chess learning. We propose reconsidering pedagogical approaches, restructuring curricula, and providing training and professional development opportunities for chess teachers to effectively implement interactive methods in their teaching.

1. Vygotskii L.S. Igra i ee rol' v psikhicheskom razvitii rebenka [The Game and Its Role in the Mental Development of the Child]. Voprosy psikhologii = Psychology issues, 1966, no. 6, pp. 62– (In Russ.).
2. Vygotskii L.S. Konkretnaya psikhologiya cheloveka [Concrete Human Psychology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. «Psikhologiya» = Bulletin of Moscow State University. Episode 14. “Psychology”, 1986, no. 1, 51–65. (In Russ.).
3. Gevorkyan S.R., Ispiryan M.M., Sarkisyan V.Zh., Tadevosyan A.V. Issledovaniya i opyt prepodavaniya predmeta «shakhmaty» v sisteme obrazovaniya Respubliki Armeniya [Research and Experience of Teaching the Subject “Chess” in the Educational System of the Republic of Armenia]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, Vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 121–135. DOI:10.17759/pse.2023280612 (In Russ.).
4. Gevorkyan S.R., Manukyan S.A., Sarkisyan V.Zh. Vliyanie uchebnoi deyatel'nosti i ustanovok uchashchikhsya nachal'noi shkoly na uchebnye dostizheniya po shakhmatam [The Impact оf Students’ Attitudesаnd Learning Activities оn the Chess Academic Achievements in Primary Schools]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 100–113. DOI:10.17759/pse.2023280508 (In Russ.).
5. Glukhova O.V., Volikova S.V., Zaretskii Yu.V., Zaretskii V.K. Rezul'taty longityudnogo diagnosticheskogo issledovaniya po proektu «Shakhmaty dlya obshchego razvitiya» [The Results of a Longi-tudinal Diagnostic Study on the Project «Chess For Overall Development»]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 49–75. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2022300404 (In Russ.).
6. Zaretskii V.K. Reflixia i razvitie: refexivno-deyatel’nostniy podhod. V kn. Razvitie kommunikativno-refleksivnykh sposobnostei u detei 6–10 let v zavisimosti ot sposobov organizatsii uchebnykh vzaimodeistvii [The Influence of Ways of Organizing Learning Interactions on the Development of Communicative and Reflexive Abilities of Children 6–10 Years Old]. Kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. V.V. Rubtsova. Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU. 203 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kravtsov G.G., Kravtsova E.E. Kul'turno-istoricheskii podkhod k voprosam obrazovaniya [Cultural-Historical Approach to Education]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2020. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4–13. DOI:10.17759/chp.2020160401 (In Russ.).
8. Sarkisyan V.Zh., Manukyan S.A., Ispiryan M.M., Gevorkyan L.L., Khachatryan E.A. Metodologiya issledovaniya vliyaniya psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik uchenikov pri obuchenii shakhmatam [The Influence of Students’ Psychological Characteristics on the Results of Learning Chess]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 97–123. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2022300406 (In Russ.).
9. Aldrich C. The Complete Guide to Simulations and Serious Games: How the Most Valuable Content Will Be Created in the Age Beyond Gutenberg to Google. John Wiley & Sons, 2009. P. 576.
10. Bloom B.S., Engelhart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., Krathwohl D.R. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc, 1956.
11. Bonwell C.C., Eison J.A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 1991. P.
12. Brookfield S.D. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. P. 336.
13. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 2008. Vol. 49(1), p. DOI:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
14. Dewey J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers, 1933. 301.
15. Dunlosky J., Rawson K.A., Marsh E.J., Nathan M.J., Willingham D.T. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 14(1), pp. 4–58. DOI:10.1177/1529100612453266
16. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M.P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014. Vol. 111(23), pp. 8410–8415. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
17. Gevorgyan S., Sargsyan V., Gevorgyan L. Socio-psychological analysis of factors influencing Chess Education. Main Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology, Scientific Periodical, Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7–19. DOI:10.24234/miopap.v8i2.403
18. Hidi S., Renninger K.A. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, Vol. 41(2), pp. 111–127. DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
19. Jonassen D.H. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. New York: Routledge, 2010. 472 p. DOI:10.4324/9780203847527
20. Khachatryan H., Khachatryan S., Movsisyan N. Elements of critical thinking in the school standards of «chess» subject. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 2021. Vol. 58(1), pp. 105–
21. Khachatryan H., Khachatryan S., Movsisyan N., Gevorgyan L. The Enhancement of Students' Critical Thinking with The Use of “Chess”. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, LXI, 1, 2024, pp. 105–120. DOI:10.57028/S61-105-Z1055
22. Khachatryan H.V., Khachatryan S.H., Movsisyan N.N. Distinctive features of the new standard of the "chess" subject. ASPU Scientific News, 2021. Vol. 3(41), pp. 52–
23. Kriegbaum K., Jansen M., Spinath B. Motivation: A predictor of PISA’s mathematical competence beyond intelligence and prior test achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 43, pp. 140–148. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.026
24. Landa L. Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1974.
25. Luan S., Nowacki M.R. (2021). Evaluation of MirMe® Online Assessment for 21st Century Skills: Situational Intelligence (SQ) and Online psychometric assessment of 21st century skills. DOI:10.31124/advance.16988389
26. Mayer R.E. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. 2014. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139547369
27. Mirzakhanyan R., Gevorgyan S., Sargsyan V., Daveyan H. Analysis of the Efficiency of Teaching Chess in Schools. Sociology Study, 2017. Vol. 7(1), pp. 36– DOI:10.17265/2159-5526/2017.01.006
28. OECD (2016) insights from the talis-pisa link data: teaching strategies for instructional quality.
29. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. Vol. 93(3), pp. 223–231. DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
30. Professional development program. Developing the capacity to teach the basics of chess. Yerevan,
31. Saragih S., Zuhri D. Teacher behavior in students’ critical thinking ability development. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2019, pp. 1–8. DOI:1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012006
32. Sargsyan A., Khachatryan A. Critical thinking and motivation of chess teachers with the «best experience». Revista Mundi Engenharia, Tecnologia e Gestão, 2021. Vol. 6(1), pp. 310–313. DOI:10.21575/25254782rmetg2021vol6n11483
33. Sargsyan V., Avetisyan M. Learning styles and teaching strategies at chess lessons. Current state and development trends of chess education. International conference Tsakhkadzor, 2019, pp. 131–135.
34. Senthamarai S. Interactive teaching strategies. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 2018. 3 (Suppl. 1), pp. 36–S38. DOI:21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.166
35. Steinert Y., Snell L.S. Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Medical Teacher, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–42. DOI:10.1080/01421599980011
36. Trigwell K., Prosser M. Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 1996. Vol. 21(3), 275–284. DOI:10.1080/03075079612331381211
37. Trinchero R., Sala G. Chess Training and Mathematical Problem-Solving: The Role of Teaching Heuristics in Transfer of Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016. Vol. 12(3), pp. 655– DOI:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1255a
38. van Oers B. An activity theory view on the development of playing. In: Schousboe I., Winther-Lindqvist D. (eds.). Children’s Play and Development. International perspectives on early childhood education and development. Vol. 8. Springer, Dordrecht, 2013, pp. 231– DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-6579-5_14
39. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by Design. ASCD, 2005.