Meta-resource determinants of teachers' personal and professional development as a system of interrelated structural and functional components: reflexive design and constructive coping

Context and relevance. In an era of rapid change across all spheres of social life, growing scholarly attention has been directed to studies exploring the phenomenon of "resourcefulness" and its manifestations in educational settings. The theoretical foundation of this research is the concept of resource-predictive determination of personal and professional development among educational subjects. Particular attention deserves the issue of resourcefulness in the quality training of teaching staff. Understanding that a system of interrelated resource components is a crucial predictor of professional success and productivity in teaching, and relating this understanding to the contemporary sociocultural context, determines the relevance of this research. Objective. This study examines the relationships between reflexive projecting and constructive coping, conceptualized as a system of psychological factors underlying the meta-resource determination of future teachers' personal and professional development. Hypothesis. Proactivity, as a component of the constructive coping resource complex, enables teachers to anticipate future challenges, account for uncertainty, and make independent decisions — capacities that are further supported by the reflexive projection resource. Methods and materials. The study involved 115 students majoring in Teacher Education and Educational Psychology (M = 20,8, SD = 2,03). A specifically designed assessment battery was used, comprising tests to evaluate the components of reflexive projection and to measure proactive behavior as part of constructive coping. Results. Reflexive projection indicators were positively correlated with constructive proactive behavior and showed no correlation with destructive proactivity. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between the dependent variable (proactivity index) and the predictors (reflexive projection indicators). Conclusions. At a conscious procedural level, constructive proactivity and reflexive projection serve as interrelated components of resource complexes that underlie meta-resource determination in future teachers' personal and professional development. When intentionally cultivated, these resources may contribute to improved outcomes in teacher education.

Introduction

The relevance of studying human psychological resources and the conditions for their formation and realization is driven by constant, ever-increasing changes occurring both in society as a whole and within the modern education system. The reform of education necessitates updating the content and methods of pedagogical activity and poses new professional and personal challenges for teachers, which require internal potentials (reserves, resources, meta-resources). Understanding the nature and mechanisms of forming a teacher's psychological resources allows not only to optimize the educational process but also, fundamentally, to create conditions for a new practice of psychological training for future teaching professionals, thereby contributing to the development of highly qualified personnel ready to meet contemporary time-related challenges.

Currently, there are numerous approaches to understanding the phenomenon of "resourcefulness", which creates difficulties not only in describing its "internal side" but also in defining its place within the conceptual field of science. This diversity of approaches generates both a wealth of interpretations and problems with operationalization, hindering the comparison of results and the construction of an integral theory. Despite the exponential growth in research volume, the scientific understanding of resourcefulness remains conceptually "blurred" and methodologically complex, requiring systematization.

An analysis of Russian and foreign studies on the resource-based approach across various fields of psychology (Mitina, Mitin, Vostokova, 2024) allowed us to identify a unique context associated with the study of psychological potentials:

• Reflexivity (Karpov, 2023; Prokhorov, Chernov, 2025; Semenov, 2023; Tyler, Boldi, Cherubini, 2022) and its role in self-regulation of personal development (Khanina, Zvezdina, Khachaturyan, 2024; Kholodnaya, 2022; Li, 2025);
• Self-project and forecasting of one's own future (Zeer, Stepanova, 2023; Kuzmenkova, 2023; Samsonenko, 2020; Fasoli, Poli, 2024; Stingl, Geraldi, 2023);
• Adaptive strategies for overcoming difficulties (Dementy, Malenov, Malenova, 2020; Leontiev, 2025; Odintsova, Lubovskiy, Kuzmina, 2024; Behbahani, Lajoie, 2024; Mammadov, Wang, Lu, 2024) and proactive personality behavior (Mironenko, Sorokin, 2022; Sunko, Grishel, Lykova, 2024; Doğanülkü, Korkmaz, 2023);
• Emotional-value engagement (Pavlova, 2024; Martin et al., 2024; Bakker, Wingerden, 2024) and meaningful involvement in professional activity (Kashapov et al., 2025; Tolochek, 2025; Wang, Hofkens, Fredricks, 2024).

Our critical analysis of major theoretical approaches enabled us to structure the research field, outline methodological gaps, and develop the concept of resource-prognostic determination of teachers' personal and professional development (Mitina, 2024). For the first time, this concept identifies and defines the psychological content of several notions:

• Reserves: accumulated professional competencies, individual style, and refined interaction models that serve as a stabilizing buffer supporting a teacher's professional viability;
• Resources: dynamic processes that act as catalysts, triggering the transformation of the professional system and the formation of its new qualities;
• Meta-resources: actualize and synchronize the work of all components at the highest level of the complex system of psychological resources, reconfiguring the system to achieve qualitatively new, previously unattainable outcomes.

Conceptual substantiation, experimental verification, and technological support for the results of theoretical-empirical research (Mitina, 2024; Mitina, Mitin, Vostokova, 2024) made it possible to present the meta-resource determination of teachers' personal and professional development as a system of interconnected structural-functional components:

• Reflexive projecting enables a teacher to analyze and correlate goals, values, and meanings with the processes and outcomes of their own actions. This lays the foundation for making one's life activity the subject of practical transformation and developmental forecasting (Mitina, Vostokova, 2025);
• Constructive coping is based on integral personality characteristics (orientation, competence, flexibility) and a high level of self-awareness, characterizes the teacher's personal maturity, supports their professional health, and performs a buffer function protecting against negative external influences (Mitina, Shchelina, 2021);
• Engagement-involvement Complex: deep emotional-value engagement of a teacher in their profession is reflected in the comprehension and modification of their behavior and relationships with students. This internal state, in turn, triggers evoking as a system of actions aimed at actively involving students in learning activities, leading to a growth in their own engagement in the educational process (Mitina, Anisimova, Mitin, 2025).

The psychological content of each resource has been studied in separate investigations, proving the influence of psychological resources on the level of teachers' personal and professional development. It is shown that the main function of resourcefulness is related not to the development of isolated qualities, but to the level of organization of its structural-functional system.

The structuring factor of reflexive projecting is "conscious readiness for transformations". Constructive coping, as a resource, contributes to maintaining professional well-being and serves as a kind of protective barrier, shielding from adverse external influence. Constructive coping strategies include proactive, preventive, and reflexive overcoming of stressful situations (Mitina, Shchelina, 2021). In this context, proactivity acts not so much as a coping mechanism, but as a quality of personality. Both reflexive projecting and proactive behavior are interconnected with the conscious volitional actions of the individual. At the same time, dichotomous interrelations between resource components have not yet been experimentally studied, although they would allow not only to concretely explain the psychological mechanisms of meta-resourcefulness but also to enrich advanced teacher education programs.

The concept of resource-prognostic determination is the most comprehensive theoretical model capable of enriching both global scientific discourse and the informed selection of diagnostic tools in fundamental and applied research.

Aim of the current study: To determine the specifics of interrelationships among indicators of resource complexes "reflexive projecting" and "constructive coping" (proactive behavior) as a system of psychological mechanisms of meta-resource determination of personal and professional development of future teachers.

Research objectives:

1. To identify the peculiarities of the formation of indicators of reflexive projecting and proactive behavior in students.
2. To analyze the interrelationships of the identified indicators.
3. To compare the levels of formation of reflectively-projective resource indicators and proactive behavior.
4. To determine the main predictors of student proactive behavior.

Materials and methods

Sample

The study analyzed data from 115 students enrolled in "Pedagogical Education" and "Psychological and Pedagogical Education" programs at the Arzamas Branch of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. The participants' age ranged from 17 to 25 years (M = 20,8, SD = 2,03).

Procedure

The research was conducted in four stages: at the first stage, diagnostics were performed to assess the formation level of indicators for reflexive projecting and proactive behavior among students; at the second stage, interrelationships between the identified indicators were analyzed; at the third stage, levels of formation for reflectively-projective resource indicators and proactive behavior were compared; at the fourth stage, the main predictors of student proactive behavior were determined.

Statistical data processing was performed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and multiple regression analysis via IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 23) and Jamovi 2.3.28 with the snowCluster module.

Methods

A specifically developed methodological program for studying the following variables was applied in the research:

• Indicators of reflexive projecting as a resource: A.V. Karpov's Reflexivity Questionnaire; V.V. Stolin and S.R. Pantileyev's Self-Attitude Inventory; T. Dembo – S.Ya. Rubinstein's Self-Esteem Assessment; J.B. Rotter's Level of Subjective Control adapted by E.F. Bazhin et al.; Personal Differential (the version adapted at the V.M. Bekhterev Institute); E.Yu. Mandrikova's Self-Organization of Activity Inventory (SOAI);
• Features of proactive behavior using A.I. Yerzin's comprehensive "Proactive Behavior" methodology.

In accordance with the psychological structural-content model of the reflectively-projective resource, which was previously validated in our works (Mitina, Vostokova, 2025), selected scales from the aforementioned inventories were analyzed. These are the scales that statistically significantly determine its factor structure.

Results

Stage one of the study. The diagnostic results for indicators of reflexive projecting and proactive behavior in students are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Expressiveness of indicators of reflexive projecting and proactive behavior (N = 115)

According to the presented results, medium levels of formation for reflexive projecting components were identified in the majority of students. The communicative component is characterized by developed reflexivity and self-interest at the upper boundary of the average level, alongside pronounced self-understanding. The affective component is characterized by clearly expressed indicators of global self-attitude, self-respect, and self-leadership; less pronounced values of auto-sympathy and self-acceptance; non-expressed self-blame; medium (realistic) levels of formed general self-esteem, professional self-esteem, and levels of professional aspiration; and an optimal level of aspiration. The behavioral component of student reflexive projecting is determined by a medium level of general self-organization, planning, purposefulness, persistence, fixation, and orientation towards the present at the lower boundary of the high level, as well as medium positive values regarding the development of volitional qualities, extraversion, and manifestations of externality within the domain of ambivalence.

Diagnostics of student proactive behavior revealed mean values for the proactivity index and all its factors. The highest scores were established on the "metamotivation" and "internal locus of control" scales (which confirms the diagnosed ambivalence of internality as an indicator of reflexive projecting). Destructive proactivity values are located at the upper limit of the lower threshold, while constructive proactivity is defined by medium indicators.

Stage two of the study. The interrelation between indicators of reflexive projecting and student proactive behavior was determined using a matrix of intercorrelations via Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (see Appendix A). As a result of the analysis, statistically significant positive correlations between most indicators of reflexive projecting and proactive behavior were identified at a high level of significance (p ≤ 0,001), with the exception of the "destructive proactivity" scale. A negative correlation at a high level of significance (p ≤ 0,001) was found between proactive behavior indicators and the "self-blame" indicator. Weaker correlations (p ≤ 0,05) were identified between the "destructive proactivity" factor and such indicators of reflexive projecting as: "reflexivity" (r = 0,222), "general self-organization" (r = 0,192), "self-organization" (r = 0,199), "purposefulness" (r = 0,188), and "activity" (r = 0,190). Less pronounced correlations (p ≤ 0,05) were observed between the indicators "forecasting consequences" and "self-acceptance" (r = 0,223), "forecasting consequences" and "orientation towards the present" (r = 0,197), and "spontaneity" and "orientation towards the present" (r = 0,192).

Stage three of the study. The results of cluster analysis performed by the k-means method allowed identifying three groups of students corresponding to the levels of formation of reflexive projecting and proactive behavior indicators: high levels of reflectively-projective resource were diagnosed in students with high proactivity indicators, and vice versa (the figure presents standardized variables). The difference between the values of the three clusters is statistically significant, which is confirmed by the results of one-way analysis of variance (see Appendix B).

Thus, it was found that in our sample: students with a high (supra-situational) level of reflexive projecting development demonstrate the highest values of proactive behavior (n = 17; 14,8%); students with a medium level of reflexive projecting development exhibit multidirectional values of proactive behavior (n = 72; 62,6%); students with a low (intra-situational) level of reflexive projecting development show the lowest values of proactive behavior (n = 26; 22,6%). The smallest differences were identified between Cluster 2 (medium level) and Cluster 3 (low level) on the scales "self-acceptance", "self-understanding", and "destructive proactivity".

Stage fourth of the study. The prediction of the influence of the reflectively-projective resource on student proactivity was studied using multiple regression analysis (stepwise method). Indicators of reflexive projecting served as independent variables, while the proactivity index served as the dependent variable. The obtained regression model is presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Regression model of the influence of reflexive projecting indicators on the proactive behavior of students (N = 115)

As a result of the analysis, the following indicators emerged as predictors of proactivity: "general self-organization", "self-respect", "reflexivity", and "level of aspiration". 

Thus, the analysis of statistical data demonstrated a significant relationship between the dependent variable (proactivity index) and the predictors (indicators of the reflectively-projective resource).

Discussion

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the research results has proven the interrelation between proactivity and reflexive projecting as components of meta-resource determination, which confirms the hypothesis put forward in this work.

According to the obtained results, only a small portion of students (Group 1, n = 17; 14,8%) are capable of consciously modeling, forecasting, and implementing an individual trajectory of professional development. They exhibit greater initiative, are able to critically evaluate their actions, choose behavioral strategies based on their own attitudes, views, beliefs, and values, guided by socially determined needs without relying on circumstances, and consciously select those behavior models that contribute to establishing permanent interpersonal interactions while stimulating creativity and intellectual development.

At the same time, a detailed analysis of the relationships between proactivity factors and indicators of reflexive projecting revealed that most students (Group 2, n = 72, 62,6%; Group 3, n = 26, 22,6%) demonstrate certain tendencies toward manipulative actions in the communication process as manifestations of destructive proactivity. This form of proactivity is, in turn, weakly correlated with the respondents' moderately developed abilities for analysis, planning, self-organization, activity management, and concentration on goals. It should be noted that students from these groups are similar in terms of formed self-acceptance; however, Group 3 demonstrates even less developed abilities for self-organization and anticipation, along with a predominantly external locus of control.

Multiple regression analysis proved that student proactivity depends on their capacity for reflection (the cognitive component of reflexive projecting), self-respect, and realistic aspiration levels (the affective component of reflexive projecting), as well as the level of self-organization development (the behavioral component of reflexive projecting). In other words, it depends on the ability to effectively and adequately manage one's potentials within a temporal context. This conclusion proves the direct interrelation and mutual influence of reflectively-projective resource components and constructive coping in the personal and professional development of future specialists. A proactive way of overcoming difficulties presupposes the ability to foresee the future, take into account its uncertainty and the diversity of possible scenarios for life events, which is ensured by the personality's reflexive and prognostic abilities.

Thus, at the procedurally conscious level, proactivity and reflexive projecting as resources ensure the teacher's self-determination in the process of their personal and professional development.

Conclusions

The results of the conducted research allowed us to draw the following main conclusions:

It is substantiated that meta-resource determination of future teachers' personal and professional development is ensured by a high level of organization and coherence within the structural-functional system of interconnected components: reflexive projecting and constructive proactivity.

A positive statistically significant correlation was revealed between indicators of reflexive projecting and constructive proactivity, alongside an absence of correlations (below the significance threshold) with destructive proactivity. This testifies to the interdependence of resource complexes.

It is shown that the predictors of constructive proactivity are indicators of reflexive projecting (general self-organization, self-respect, reflexivity, and level of aspiration).

It has been established that students with a high level of reflexive projecting demonstrate the highest indicators of proactive behavior (n = 17, 14,8%). Students with medium and low levels of reflexive projecting are characterized by multidirectional and low proactivity indicators.

The content of constructive and destructive prosocial behavior in relation to reflectively-projective characteristics has been specified. The identified differences determine the theoretical and technological substantiation for programs and methods aimed at forming and correcting reflexive projecting and constructive coping as resources for personal and professional teacher development.

Prospects for further research, considering the obtained data, are associated with creating a complex of psychological-pedagogical conditions (intrapsychological, inter-intrapsychological, and interpersonal) for actualizing developmental resources, and implementing convergent programs aimed at the purposeful and systematic formation of a complex integrative quality that determines the meta-resource conditioning of future teachers' personal and professional formation.

The research results make a significant contribution to psychological theory and educational practice; they allow expanding scientific understanding of the concept "meta-resource determination of personal and professional development," detailing and supplementing the psychological content and technological support for the professional training of student-teachers under the conditions of renewed education.

Limitations. Future research should consider expanding the sample size.

1. Дементий, Л.И., Маленов, А.А., Маленова, А.Ю. (2020). Уровень самоактуализации и адаптационный потенциал как копинг-ресурсы личности на этапе самореализации. Сибирский психологический журнал, 78, 80—98. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/78/5
   Dementiy, L.I., Malenov, A.A., Malenova, A.Yu. (2020). Self-Actualization Level and Adaptation Potential as Personality Coping Resources at the Stage of Self-Realization. Siberian journal of psychology, 78, 80— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/78/5
2. Зеер, Э.Ф., Степанова, Л.Н. (2023). Акмеологическая технология прогнозирования индивидуальных профессионально-ориентированных траекторий развития личности студентов. Образование и наука, 25(6), 69— https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-69-99
   Zeer, E.F., Stepanova, L.N. (2023). Acmeological Technology of Forecasting Individual Profes Sional-Oriented Trajectories of Students’ Personality Development. The Education and Science Journal, 25(6), 69—99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-69-99
3. Карпов, А.В. (2023). Психика и время: В 2 т. Том 2. Функционирование. Генезис. Репрезентации. Ярославль: ООО «Филигрань».
   Karpov, A.V. (2023). Psyche and time: In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Functioning. Genesis. Representations. Yaroslavl: Filigree LLC. (In Russ.).
4. Кашапов, М.М., Башкин, М.В., Кашапов, А.С., Бахвалова, О.А. (2025). Психология конфликтной компетентности. Ярославль: Канцлер.
   Kashapov, M.M., Bashkin, M.V., Kashapov, А.S., Bakhvalova, O.A. (2025). Psychology of Сonflict Сompetence. Yaroslavl: The Chancellor. (In Russ.).
5. Кузьменкова, О.В. (2023). Содержание планирования профессионального будущего у студентов (на примере студентов педагогического вуза). Проблемы современного педагогического образования, 79(3), 228—231.
   Kuzmenkova, O.V. (2023). Content of Planning the Professional Students' Future (on the Example of the Pedagogical University Students). Problems of modern pedagogical education, 79(3), 228—231. (In Russ.).
6. Леонтьев, Д.А. (2025). Совладание в контексте саморегуляции. Часть 2. Полиресурсная модель. Психологический журнал, 46(2), 5—12. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225020014
   Leontiev, D.A. (2025). Coping (Sovladanie) in the Context of Self-Regulation. Part 2. A Poliresource Model. Psychological Journal, 46(2), 5—12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225020014
7. Мироненко, И.А., Сорокин, П.С. (2022). Проблема проактивности личности во взаимодействии со средой в современном международном дискурсе. Психологический журнал, 43(4), 79— https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920021483-7
   Mironenko, I., Sorokin, P.S. (2022). The Problem of Human Agency in Contemporary International Science. Psychological Journal, 43(4), 79—89. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920021483-7
8. Митина, Л.М. (2024). Ресурсно-прогностическая детерминация личностно-профессионального развития педагога: научное обоснование и технологические решения. Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология, 17(2), 13—32. https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-09
   Mitina, L.M. (2024). Resource-prognostic determination of personal and professional development of a teacher: scientific substantiation and technological solutions. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 17(2), 13— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/TEP-24-09
9. Митина, Л.М., Анисимова, О.А., Митин, Г.В. (2025). Профилактика и коррекция склонности учащихся к зависимостям и правонарушениям: роль психологических ресурсов учителя. Психология и право, 15(4), 128— https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150407
   Mitina, L.M., Anisimova, O.A., Mitin, G.V. (2025). Prevention and Correction of Students' Inclination to Addictions and Offenses: the Role of the Teacher's Psychological Resources. Psychology and Law, 15(4), 128—146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150407
10. Митина, Л.М., Востокова, Ю.И. (2025). Психологический ресурс «рефлексивное проектирование» личностно-профессионального развития будущих педагогов: концепция, технология, программы. М.: ФНЦ ПМИ.
    Mitina, L.M., Vostokova,I. (2025). Psychological resource "reflexive design" of personal and professional development of future teachers: concept, technology, programs. Moscow: FSC PMR. (In Russ.).
11. Митина, Л.М., Щелина, С.О. (2021). Ресурсная детерминация личностно-профессионального развития студентов-психологов. М.: Психологический институт РАО.
    Mitina, L.M., Shchelina, S.O. (2021). Resource determination of personal and professional development of psychology students. Moscow: Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education. (In Russ.).
12. Одинцова, М.А., Лубовский, Д.В., Кузьмина, Е.И. (2023). Психологические ресурсы личности при проживании жизненных ситуаций разной степени неопределенности. Социальная психология и общество, 14(4), 156— https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140410
    Odintsova, M.A., Lubovsky, D.V., Kuzmina, E.I. (2023). Psychological Resources of the Individual when Living Life Situations of Varying Degrees of Uncertainty. Social Psychology and Society, 14(4), 156—177. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140410
13. Павлова, Е.В. (2024). К вопросу о соотношении типологических особенностей и психологических мерностей «ресурса вовлеченности» студентов в пространство жизнеосуществления. Общество: социология, психология, педагогика, 8, 20— https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2024.8.2
    Pavlova, E.V. (2024). On the Issue of the Relationship between Typological Features and Psychological Dimensions of the «Resource of Involvement» of Students in the Space of Life Fulfillment. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 8, 20—28. https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2024.8.2
14. Прохоров, А.О., Чернов, А.В. (2025). Динамика ментальной регуляции психических состояний студентов с различным уровнем рефлексивности. Сибирский психологический журнал, 96, 219— https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/96/11
    Prokhorov, A.O., Chernov, A.V. (2025). Dynamics of Mental Regulation of Psychological States of Students with Different Levels of Reflexivity. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian journal of psychology, 96, 219—229. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/96/11
15. Самсоненко, Л.С. (2020). Содержательные особенности развития прогностических способностей у студентов-психологов. Научный результат. Педагогика и психология образования, 6(2), 94— https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2020-6-2-0-9
    Samsonenko, L.S. (2020). Content Features of the Development of Prognostic Abilities in Psychology Students. Research Result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 6(2), 94—107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2020-6-2-0-9
16. Семенов, И.Н. (2023). Методология, теория, практика рефлексивной психологии творчества и педагогики развития человеческого капитала. Известия Российской академии образования, 3(63), 44— https://doi.org/10.51944/20738498_2023_3_44
    Semenov, I.N. (2023). Methodology, Theory, Practice of Reflexive Psychology of Creativity and Pedagogy of Human Capital Development. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Education, 3(63), 44—63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51944/20738498_2023_3_44
17. Сунько, Т.Ю., Гришель, П.В., Лыкова, Н.С. (2024). Проактивная направленность личности студентов: психометрические характеристики и сравнительный анализ. Клиническая и специальная психология, 13(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130103
    Sunko, T.Y., Grishel, P.V., Lykova, N.S. (2024). Proactive Orientation of Students' Personality: Psychometric Characteristics and Comparative Analysis. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 13(1), 46— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130103
18. Толочек, В.А. (2025). Профессиональная карьера: феномен, концепции, «апокрифы». Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14. Психология, 48(1), 30— https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-25-02
    Tolochek, V.A. (2025). Professional Career: Phenomenon, Concepts, Apocryphas. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 48(1), 30—54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-25-02
19. Ханина, Ю.Ю., Звездина, Г.П., Хачатурян, Н.Н. (2024). Изучение взаимосвязи рефлексивности и личностного потенциала молодежи. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 7(1), 258— https://doi.org/10.58224/2658-3313-2024-7-1-258-265
    Khanina, Yu.Yu., Zvezdina, G.P., Khachaturyan, N.N. (2024). Studying the Relationship Between Reflexivity and Personal Potential of Youth. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 7(1), 258—265. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.58224/2658-3313-2024-7-1-258-265
20. Холодная, М.А. (2022). Светлые и темные стороны рефлексии и арефлексии: эффект расщепления. Психологический журнал, 43(4), 15— https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920021475-8
    Kholodnaya, M.A. (2022). Light and Dark Sides of Reflection and Areflection: Splitting Effect. Psychological Journal, 43(4), 15—26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920021475-8
21. Bakker, A.B., van Wingerden, J. (2024). The Job Demands–Resources theory of work engagement: A multilevel and dynamic perspective.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(4), 294— https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241253117
22. Behbahani,G., Lajoie, D. (2024). Patterns of individual differences in coping strategies: Criterion profile analysis of open coping strategies data. Personality and Individual Differences, 223, Article 112634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112634
23. Doğanülkü, A., Korkmaz, O. (2023). The role of proactive personality and general self-efficacy in proactive career behavior: a mediation model. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 25(2), 539 — https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09597-9
24. Fasoli, G., Poli, R. (2024). Future Orienteering Evaluation Model: forecasting, foresight and anticipation indices. European Journal of Futures Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-024-00242-4
25. Li, H. (2025). Reflective practice for pre-service teachers' professional development. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363136
26. Mammadov,, Wang, S., Lu, Z. (2024). Personality types and their associations with psychological resilience, coping with stress, and life satisfaction among undergraduate students: A latent profile analysis approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 222, Article 112599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112599
27. Martin,J., Collie, R.J., Stephan, M., Flesken, A., Halcrow, F., McCourt, B. (2024). What is the role of teaching support in students’ motivation and engagement trajectories during adolescence? A four-year latent growth modeling study. Learning and Instruction, 92, Article 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101910
28. Mitina, L.M., Mitin, G.V., Vostokova, Yu.I. (2024). Psychological analysis of promising research on the resourceprognostic determination of personal and professional development of a teacher. Perspectives of Science and Education, 70(4), 533— https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.4.33
29. Stingl,, Geraldi, J. (2023). Imagining futures: Cognitive processes of desirable or undesirable project prospections. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, Article 122701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122701
30. Tyler,, Boldi, M., Cherubini, M. (2022). Contemporary self-reflective practices: A large-scale survey. Acta Psychologica, 230, Article 103768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103768
31. Wang, M.-T., Hofkens, T., Fredricks, J.A.(2024).The Longitudinal Interplay of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement from Middle to High School: A Latent Transition Analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 267—284