Relationship between disharmony of interpersonal relations and imbalance of axiosphere of the senior school student’s personality

The aim of the research which is presented in the article was the identification of peculiarities of relationship between disharmony of interpersonal relations and imbalance of axiosphere of the senior school student’s personality. Main contradictions and imbalances in the structure of the axiosphere and the level of development of indicators of interpersonal relations disharmony were identified on a sample of test subjects (127 senior school students - 48 boys and 79 girls, pupils of a secondary school in Tolyatti, Samara region) through the use of “Personality’s axiological directivity” and “Subjective evaluation of personality’s interpersonal relations” techniques. Significant interrelations were identified through the use of incremental regression analysis. It is shown that the peculiarities of interrelations between disharmony of interpersonal relations and imbalance of axiosphere of the senior school student’s personality depend on the gender and age of test subjects.

1. Akimova M.K., Kiseleva A.V. Vnutrennii cennostnyi konflikt kak faktor agressivnosti v yunosheskom vozraste // Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2009. T. 2. ?3.
2. Berns R. Razvitie Ya-koncepcii i vospitanie. M., 1986.
3. Bozhovich E.D. Veroyatnostnyi harakter svyazi mezhdu vnutri- i mezhlichnostnoi konfliktnost'yu podrostkov //Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2007. 2.
4. Duhnovskii S.V. Sub'ektivnaya ocenka mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenii. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu. SPb., 2006.
5. Kapcov A.V. Protivorechiya v aksiosfere kak faktor razvitiya lichnostnyh kachestv studentov //Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2010. T.3. 2.
6. Kapcov A.V., Karpushina L.V. Aksiologicheskaya napravlennost' lichnosti. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu testa: Metod. posobie. Samara, 2005.
7. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Zakony evolyucii i samoorganizacii slozhnyh sistem. M., 1994.
8. Kobzeva O.V. Dinamika agressivnosti i ee vzaimodeistviya s lichnostnymi osobennostyami v podrostkovom i yunosheskom vozrastah // Zhurnal prikladnoi psihologii. 2006. № 5.
9. Kon I.S. Psihologiya rannei yunosti. M., 1989.
10. Liseckii K.S, Lityagina E.V. Psihologiya ne-zavisimosti: Ucheb. posobie po kursu «Profilaktika addiktivnogo povedeniya». 2003. Elektronnaya versiya: http://www.psycheya.ru/lib/psi_nez/5.htm
11. Lichko A.E. Psihopatii i akcentuacii haraktera u podrostkov: 2-e izd. L., 1983.
12. Moreno Ya.L. Sociometriya. Eksperimental'nyi metod i nauka ob obshestve. M., 2001.
13. Nekrasova E.V. Psihologicheskie prichiny disgarmonii mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenii starsheklassnikov // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN. 2011. T. 13. 2(4).
14. Trofimova I.N. Modelirovanie social'nogo povedeniya //Sinergetika i psihologiya: Teksty. Vyp. 2. Social'nye processy /Pod red. I.N.Trofimovoi. M., 1999.
15. Festinger L. Teoriya kognitivnogo dissonansa. SPb., 1999.
16. Shlyahtina O.I. Vzaimosvyaz' agressivnosti s lichnostnymi osobennostyami i social'nym statusom //Anan'evskie chteniya № 97. SPb., 1997.
17. Ervin Bauer i teoreticheskaya biologiya (K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya): Sb. nauch. trudov / Otv. red. S.E. Shnol'. Pushino, 1993.
18. Braithwaite V.A., Law H.G. Structure of Human Values: Testing the Adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985. Vol. 49.
19. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries // M.P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 25.