A "Map" of Common Points of View in the Discourse about Drug Addicts: An Exploratory Study

705

Abstract

Drug use continues to be one of the key public health problems, so it is particularly relevant to develop effective prevention programs targeted at different groups of young people. In this case, any preventive measure must necessarily rely on the results of empirical research. The article presents the results of the preparatory phase of the study of social representations about drug addicts, made in the framework of the theory of social representations (in the framework of the Geneva School ideas developed by V. Doisy and colleagues). The aim of the study was to identify the "map" of the common points of view in the discourse about drug addicts. The sample consisted of 308 people (195 men and 112 women, and one respondent did not state his gender), aged 16 to 47 years (median age is 25 years). The results provide empirical support for the hypothesis of the authors of the "map" of common points of view in the discourse about drug addicts.

General Information

Keywords: drug addicts, the theory of social representations, "map" of common points of view in the discourse about drug addicts, public and private spheres, medical, social and legal contexts of discourse about drug addicts

Journal rubric: Juridical Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2014060301

For citation: Kovalev M.A., Konkin V.Y., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Bovina I.B., Debolsky M.G., Il’in A.V. A "Map" of Common Points of View in the Discourse about Drug Addicts: An Exploratory Study [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2014. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2014060301. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Berezina E.B. Soderzhaniye i struktura obydennykh predstavleniy o boleznyakh v molodezhnoy srede. Dis. kand. psykhol. nauk. [Content and structure of everyday representations of illnesses among youth. Ph.D (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2011. 252 p.
  2. Bovina I.B. Sotsial'nyye predstavleniya o zdorov'ye I bolezni: struktura, dinamika, mekhanizmy. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [Social representations of health and illness: structure, dynamics, and mechanisms. Dr.Sci. (Psychology) diss]. Moscow, 2009. 473 p.
  3. Bovina I.B., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Debol'skiy M.G., Konopleva I.N., Il'in A.V Narkotiki v molodezhnom diskurse: podkhod teorii sotsial'nykh predstavleniy [Drugs in the youth discourse: social representations theory perspective] Prikladnay ayuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Applied forensic psychology], 2013, no. 1, pp. 49–58.
  4. Grigorets F.I. Narkotizatsiya molodezhi: kharakteristiki, prichiny, profilaktika. [Drud addiction among youth: characteristics, causes, and prevention], Vladivostok: Publ. “48 chasov”, 2012. 148 p.
  5. Yemel'yanova T.P. Problema stigmatizatsii narkozavisimykh lyudey v dvukhvozrastnykh gruppakh [The problem of stigmatization of drug users in two age groups]. In Zhuravlev A.L. (eds.) Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya nravstvennosti [Psychological research of ethics]. Moscow: Publ. Institute of Psychology, “Russian Academy of Sciences”, 2013, pp. 303–326.
  6. Kirzhanova V.V. Mediko-sotsial'nyye posledstviya in"yektsionnogo upotrebleniya narkotikov v Rossii (metody otsenki I preduprezhdeniya). Avtoref. diss. d. med. nauk.[Medical and social consequences of injecting drug usage in Russia (evaluation methods and prevention). Dr. Sci. (Medicine) diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 45 p.
  7. Osnovnyye pokazateli deyatel'nosti narkologicheskoy sluzhby v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2010-2011 godakh. Statisticheskiy sbornik [The main indicators of narcological service in Russian Federation in 2010-2011]. Moscow, 2012. 212 p.
  8. Shcherbakova Ye.M. Narkonashestviye v Rossii: o chem. Govorit statistika? [Invasion of drugs in Russia: what do statistics say?]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2004, no. 1, pp. 70–75.
  9. Abric J. C. Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994. 256 p.
  10. Breakwell G. Social representational constraints upon identity processes. Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. Eds. by K. Deaux, G. Philogène. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 271-284.
  11. Clémеnce A. L’analyse des principes organisateurs des représentations sociales. Les méthodes des sciences humaines. Sous la dir. S. Moscovici, F. Buschini. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003, pp. 393–410.
  12. Dany L, Apostolidis T. L’étude des représentations sociales de la drogue et du cannabis: un enjeu pour la prévention. Santé publique, 2002. Vol.14, pp. 335–344.
  13. Doise W. Human rights studied as normative social representations. Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. Deaux K. , Philogène G. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 2001, pp. 96–112.
  14. Doise W. Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept. In Doise W. (eds.) L’étude des représentations sociales, 1986, pp. 86-98.
  15. Doise W., Spini D., Clémence A. Humain rights studies as social representations in a cross-cultural context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1999. Vol. 29, pp. 1–29.
  16.  Echebarria-Echabe A., Fernandez-Guede E., Sanjuan Guillen C., Valencia- Garate J.F. Social representations of drugs, causal judgment and social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1992. Vol. 22, pp. 73–84.
  17. Galand Ch., Salès-Wuillemin E. La représentation des drouges chez les étudiantes en psychologie: effects des pratiques de consumation et influence de l’entourage. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2009. Vol. 84, pp. 125–152.
  18. Hadley C., Stockdale J.E. Children’s representations of the world of drugs. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1996. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 276–289.
  19. Lorenzi-Cioldi F., Clémence A. Group process and the construction of social representations. In Hogg M.A. (eds.) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 311–333.
  20. Moscovici S. Introduction. In C. Herzlich, Health and illness. A social psychological analysis. London, Academic Press, 1973, pp. ix-xiv.
  21. World drug report 2013, United Nations, New York: United Nations publication, 2013. 145 p.
  22. Zafiropoulos M., Pinell P. Drogues, déclassement et stratégies de disqualification. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1982, no. 42, pp. 61–75.

Information About the Authors

M. A. Kovalev, chair of criminal psychology, department of legal psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: korolenko.maks@yandex.ru

V. Y. Konkin, post-graduate student of the Department of clinical and forensic psychology, faculty of legal psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: razor-ruman@ya.ru

Nikolay V. Dvoryanchikov, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Dean, Faculty of Legal and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-5469, e-mail: dvorian@gmail.com

Inna B. Bovina, Doctor of Psychology, Research Director, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical and Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-6199, e-mail: innabovina@yandex.ru

Michael G. Debolsky, PhD in Psychology, professor, Professor, Department of legal psychology and law, faculty of legal psychology, MSUPE, leading researcher, PKU research Institute of the Federal penitentiary service, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-0077, e-mail: mdebolsky@mail.ru

Alexander V. Il’in, PhD in Psychology, PKU "Scientifically-research Institute FSIN of Russia», Moscow, Russia, e-mail: ailin99@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1953
Previous month: 6
Current month: 0

Downloads

Total: 705
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0