The problem of crime repetition risk after early release on parole

2210

Abstract

We examined the psychological problems encountered in the implementation of such an important legal institution as release on parole. We show the progressiveness of the measure, its stimulating effect on the law-abiding behavior of the convicts in prison. However, analysis of the practice of parole reveals a number of problems: high level of crime repetition; presence of a large proportion of convicts (60%) who did not use their right to parole; a large number of disagreements between the administration of correctional institutions and the courts in assessing the degree of correction and deciding on parole; absence of unambiguous criteria of correction. We paid considerable attention to the analysis of the conceptual approaches that underpin the practice of early release of convicts in Russia and abroad. The advantages of the domestic concept are assessment of the degree of correction, and its humanistic orientation. We also describe the history of development and maintenance of foreign concepts in evaluating risk factors for parole prisoners. The author believes that the domestic and international approaches are interrelated, but the latter is more pragmatic and focused on the prediction of human behavior at large, taking into account his capacity to meet basic needs (both vital and social). The article shows the experience of applied research aimed at understanding the system of recidivism risk assessment and opportunities of repetition risk reduction in parole prisoners.

General Information

Journal rubric: Penitentiary Psychology and Penal Practice

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Debolsky M.G. The problem of crime repetition risk after early release on parole [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2014. Vol. 4, no. 1 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Antonjan Ju.M., Enikeev M.I., Jeminov V.E. Psihologija prestupnika i rassledovanija prestuplenij. – M.: Jurist#, 1996.
  2. Bartol K. Psihologija kriminal'nogo povedenija. – SPb.: prajm-EVROZNAK, 2004. –  S.331.
  3. Berezin F.B. i dr. Metodika mnogostoronnego issledovanija lichnosti. – M.: Medicina, 1976.
  4. Blekborn R. Psihologija kriminal'nogo povedenija. – SPb.: Piter, 2004. –  596s.
  5. Debol'skij M.G., Vasishhev A.A. i dr. Psihodiagnostika v ugolovno-ispolnitel'noj sisteme. – M.: NII FSIN Rossii, 2008. – 268 s.
  6. Dvorjanchikov N.V., Nosov S.S., Salamova D.K. Polovoe samosoznanie i metody ego diagnostiki: ucheb.posobie – M.: FLINTA: Nauka, 2011. – 216.
  7. Zel'dov Z.I. Osvobozhdenie ot nakazanija i ot ego otbyvanija. – M., 1982.
  8. Kliniko-psihologicheskie metody ocenki riska sovershenija agressivnyh dejstvij.–  M.: FGU «Gosudarstvennyj nauchnyj centr social'noj i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. V.P.Serbskogo», 2008.
  9. Kojl Je. Podhod k upravleniju tjur'moj s pozicij prav cheloveka: Posobie dlja tjuremnogo personala. – London: Mezhdunarodnyj centr tjuremnyh issledovanij, 2002. – 156 s.
  10. Metodicheskie rekomendaciipo provedeniju psihodiagnosticheskogo obsledovanija osuzhdennyh (nahodjashhihsja v karantine ispravitel'nogo uchrezhdenija, predstavljaemyh k perevodu v koloniju-poselenie, obrativshihsja v sud s hodatajstvom ob uslovno-dosrochnom osvobozhdenii) /Rukovoditel' avtorskogo kollektiva M.G. Debol'skij. – M.: FSIN Rossii, 2008. – 93 s.
  11. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po rabote s osuzhdjonnymi «gruppy riska», imejushhimi psihicheskie anomalii. – M.: FSIN Rossii, 2005. – 36s.
  12. Metodicheskie rekomendacii «Sistema ocenki osuzhdjonnyh, osvobozhdajushhihsja uslovno-dosrochno». Prakticheskoe posobie. – Samara, 2010. –  51 s.
  13. Minimal'nye standartnye pravila obrashhenija s zakljuchjonnymi. Odobreny jekonomicheskim i social'nym sovetom OON v rezoljucijah  ot 31 ijulja 1957 g. i ot 13 maja 1977 g.//Zashhita prav cheloveka v mestah lishenija svobody. – M.: Jurisprudencija, 2003. – S. 38–54.
  14. Muhina V.S. Otchuzhdennye: absoljut otchuzhdenija. M.: Prometej, 2009. – 704 s.
  15. Nazarova N.G., Oshevskij D.S. Psihologicheskie faktory riska  agressivnogo povedenija u nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh / Juridicheskaja psihologija. № 4. 2013. – S.15–19.
  16. Noj I.S. O celjah nakazanija v sovetskom ugolovnom prave // Voprosy ugolovnogo prava i processa. Sb.st. Vyp. 2. Minsk, 1960.
  17. Penitenciarnaja kriminologija: uchebnik /pod red. Ju.M. Antonjana, A.Ja. Grishko. – Rjazan', Akademija FSIN Rossii, 2009. –  567 s.
  18. Pirozhkov V.F. Kriminal'naja psihologija. – M.: Os'-89, 2001. – 702 s.
  19. Reformy: plany, taktika, strategija // Prestuplenie i nakazanie: obshhestvenno-politicheskij i nauchno-metodicheskij penitenciarnyj zhurnal. 2009. № 12. S.6.
  20. Ross L., Nisbett R. Chelovek i situacija.Perspektivy social'noj psihologii/Per. s angl. V.V.Rumynskogo; pod red. E.N.Emel'janova, V.S.Moguna. – M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. – 429 s.
  21. Sistema Ocenki Pravonarushitelja (SisOP). –  M.: PRI, 2005. – 256 s.
  22. Sobchik L.N. Standartizirovannyj mnogofaktornyj metod issledovanija lichnosti (SMIL). – M., 1990.
  23. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. – M., 2013.
  24. Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. – M., 2013.
  25. Shishkov S.N., Safuanov F.S. Vlijanie psihicheskih anomalijna sposobnost' byt' sub#ektom ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti i sub#ektom otbyvanija nakazanija.  //Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 2.
  26. www.fsin.su/structura.../statistika (Na 3.03. 2014 g.).

Information About the Authors

Michael G. Debolsky, PhD in Psychology, associate professor, Professor, Department of legal psychology and law, faculty of legal psychology, Moscow State University of psychology and education (MSUPE), leading researcher, PKU research Institute of the Federal penitentiary service, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-0077, e-mail: mdebolsky@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 11890
Previous month: 50
Current month: 36

Downloads

Total: 2210
Previous month: 7
Current month: 3