Life Values and Biopsychological Age of Law Enforcement Officers

86

Abstract

It is important to investigate the personal factors that affect the biological age and the rate of aging of specialists. It was assumed that life values can both raise and lower their biopsychological age. The sample consisted of 61 law enforcement officers aged 22 to 44 years (average age 32.5 years), of which 40 were male and 21 were female. The average professional experience is 10.5 years. In the survey, 3 methods were used, and correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used for data processing. The results of the study show that a number of values are factors of the biological and psychological age of law enforcement officers, their rate of aging and psychobiological maturity. The obtained data should be taken into account in the process of their psychological preparation for professional activity and prevention of stress disorders.

General Information

Keywords: biological age, life values, psychological age, psychological maturity, aging rate

Journal rubric: Psychology of Professional Activity

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120403

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation, project number № 19-18-00058.

Received: 10.10.2021

Accepted:

For citation: Koteneva A.V., Etrivanova T. Life Values and Biopsychological Age of Law Enforcement Officers [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 28–41. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2022120403. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Abramovich S.G., Bush M.P., Korovina E.O. Biologicheskii vozrast u voennosluzhashchikh pravookhranitel’nykh organov [The biological age in military men of law enforcement organs]. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal = Siberian Medical Journal, 2008, no. 5, pp. 27–30 (In Russ.).
  2. Belozerova L.M. Fizicheskaya rabotosposobnost’ i biologicheskii vozrast muzhchin [Exercise performance and biological age of men]. Klinicheskaya gerontologiya. = Clinical Gerontology, 2008, no. 5, pp. 21–24 (In Russ.).
  3. Berezina T.N. (ed.). Biopsikhologicheskii vozrast professionalov: rezul’taty i perspektivy issledovanii: kollektivnaya monografiya. Moscow: Entsiklopedist-Maksimum, 2019. 197 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Berezina T.N. (ed.). Biopsikhologicheskii vozrast i zdorov’e professionalov: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Moscow: ID Akademii Zhukovskogo, 2020. 231 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Dmitrieva L.A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti vzaimovliyaniya professional’noi deyatel’nosti i semeinykh otnoshenii sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del i ugolovno-ispolnitel’noi sistemy: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Moscow, 2002. 23 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Isaeva M.R. Zhiznennye tsennosti v ponimanii studentov i lyudei raznogo vozrasta. Academy, 2019, no. 5 (44), pp. 68–70 (In Russ.).
  7. Kashirskiy D.V., Sabelnikova N.V., Ovchinnikova A.N. Tsennosti spasatelei s razlichnoi stepen’yu emotsional’nogo vygoraniya [Values in rescuers with varying degrees of emotional burnout] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2013. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 14–24. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2013/n2/62343.shtml (Accessed 09.10.2021) (In Russ., а in Engl.).
  8. Koteneva A.V. Sotsial’no-demograficheskie i psikhologicheskie faktory biopsikhologicheskogo vozrasta spetsialistov opasnykh professii [Socio-demographic and psychological factors of biopsychological age of specialists of dangerous professions]. In Berezina T.N. (ed.). Biopsikhologicheskii vozrast i zdorov’e professionalov: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Moscow: ID Akademii Zhukovskogo, 2020, 45–58 (In Russ.).
  9. Koteneva A.V. Smyslozhiznennye orientatsii i biopsikhologicheskii vozrast sotrudni-kov ugolovno-ispolnitel’noi sistemy [The Life-meaning Orientations and Biopsychological Age of Correctional Officials] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 36–51. doi:10.17759/psylaw.20201003 (In Russ.).
  10. Koteneva A.V., Kobzarev S.A. Osobennosti tsennostno-smyslovoi sfery spasatelei s raznym urovnem professional’noi sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoi adaptatsii [Features of the value-semantic sphere of rescuers with different levels of professional socio-psychological adaptation] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2019. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–52. doi:10.17759/sps.2019100103 (In Russ., а in Engl.).
  11. Langle A. Emotsional’noe vygoranie s pozitsii ekzistentsial’nogo analiza [Burn-out from the point of view of existential analysis]. Voprosy psikhologii = Voprosy Psikhologii, 2008, no. 2, pp. 3–16 (In Russ.).
  12. Poltorak N.A. Vliyanie vneshnikh i vnutrennikh tsennostei na formirovanie sindroma emotsional’nogo vygoraniya [Impact of external and internal values on the formation of burnout]. Aspirant, 2016, no. 2 (18), pp. 32–34 (In Russ.).
  13. Razumnikova O.M., Asanova N.V. Znachenie osnovnykh zhiznennykh tsennostei i vozrastnye osobennosti samootsenki zdorov’ya. Zdorov’e — osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya = Health — the Base of Human Potential: Problems and Ways to Solve Them, 2011. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 493–500 (In Russ.).
  14. Sergienko E.A. Sub”ektivnyi i khronologicheskii vozrast cheloveka [Subjective and chronological human age] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 2013. Vol. 6, no. 30. doi:10.54359/ps.v6i30.689 (In Russ.).
  15. Sopov V.F., Karpushina L.F. Morfologicheskii test zhiznennykh tsennostei // [Morphological test of life values]. Prikladnaya psikhologiya = Applied Psychology, 2001, 4, pp. 9–30 (In Russ.).
  16. Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Kognitivnyi rezerv kak determinanta pozitivnogo stareniya [Cognitive reserve as a determinant of positive ageing]. Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii, 2019, no. 1 (30), pp. 200–210 (In Russ.).
  17. Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Psikhologicheskii vozrast kak resurs v period pozdnei vzroslosti i stareniya [Psychological age as a resource in midlife and aging]. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya, psikhiatriya, psikhoterapiya = Medical Psychology, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, 2013, no. 3 (48), pp. 91–97 (In Russ.).
  18. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Man's Search for Meaning]. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 367 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Shaab K.S. Lichnostnye ustanovki i orientiry kak faktor dolgoletiya [Personal settings and orienting points as longevity factor]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta = Tambov University Review, 2011, no. 9 (101), pp. 289–294 (In Russ.).
  20. Shestun E.V., Morozova E.A., Podorovskaya I.A., Ustyuzhaninova E.N. Vozmozhnosti diagnostiki lichnostnykh urovnei s pomoshch’yu metodiki “Ierarkhiya lichnosti” [The Method of “Personality’s Hierarchy” and Its Potential] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2010. 15, no. 1, pp. 69–81. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2010/n1/27995.shtml (Accessed 09.10.2021). (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  21. Cosco T.D., Prina A.M., Perales J., Stephan B.C.M., Brayne C. Operational definitions of successful aging: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 2014. Vol. 26, no. 3, pр. 373—381. doi:10.1017/S1041610213002287
  22. Epel E.S., Prather A.A. Stress, telomeres, and psychopathology: Toward a deeper understanding of a triad of early aging. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, no. 1, pр. 371–397. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045054
  23. Han L.K.M., Verhoeven J.E., Tyrka A.R., Penninx B.W.J.H., Wolkowitz O.M., Månsson K.N.T., Lindqvist D., Boks M.P., Révész D., Mellon S.H., Picard M. Accelerating research on biological aging and mental health: Current challenges and future directions (Review). Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2019. Vol. 106, pр. 293–311. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.04.004
  24. Koteneva A.V. Psychological factors of biopsychological age of law enforcement personnel. Agathos: an International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 2(21), pр. 221–231.
  25. Koteneva A.V. Personal health in the context of Christian worldview. Agathos: an International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020, Vol. 11, no. 1(20), pр. 301–309.
  26. Moreno-Villanueva M., Bürkle A. Molecular consequences of psychological stress in human aging. Experimental Gerontology, 2014. Vol. 68, pр. 39–42. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2014.12.003
  27. Reed R.G. Stress and immunological aging. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2019. Vol. 28, pр. 38–43. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.012
  28. Rentscher K.E., Carroll J.E., Repetti R.L., Cole S.W., Robles T.F. Chronic stress exposure and daily stress appraisals relate to biological aging marker p16INK4a. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2019. V 102, pр.139–148. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.006

Information About the Authors

Anna V. Koteneva, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Professor, Chair of Scientific Basis of Extreme Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-567X, e-mail: akoteneva@yandex.ru

Tatyana Etrivanova, Psychologist, Psychological Work Group, Military Unit 14524, Voronezh, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0060-0279, e-mail: tatyana.shiha@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 436
Previous month: 26
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 86
Previous month: 8
Current month: 4