Evidence-Based Approach in the Social Area: Basic Concepts and Guidelines, History, Prospects



The article is devoted to the development of the evidence-based approach in the field of psychological and social practices. The article analyzes the concept of evidence-based practice, its main aspects and components. The authors show that the transfer of the evidence-based approach from medicine, where it originated, to the social sphere was accompanied by significant changes in the very concept of evidence-based practice. Reliance on scientific research of the effects of practice remains the main principle of the evidence-based approach, but in the field of psychosocial practices, the emphasis on the role of interpersonal interaction in the implementation of the practice, involving all its participants in decision-making, including patients/clients/beneficiaries, is no less significant. Unlike medicine, where priority is given to randomized controlled trials, the empirical justification of social practices can be based on other methodologies too, including quasi-experimental studies and even qualitative case descriptions. The danger of bureaucratization of the social sphere due to the introduction of the evidence-based approach is discussed. According to the authors, there is a tendency to understand evidence-based practice as a choice from a limited number of decisions supported by research and/or supported by donors. However, this simplified “drug model”, although convenient for funding organizations, does not correspond to the essence of the evidence-based approach. Proponents of the evidence-based approach certainly support practitioners to use practices with a solid empirical basis, but at the same time to focus on the entire context of interaction with a patient/client, their needs and the capabilities of the social support system.

General Information

Keywords: evidence-based practice, practice with empirically proven effectiveness, justified process of practice implementation, study of the effects of practices, ethics of practical work

Journal rubric: General Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2020010101

For citation: Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Stanilevsky V.V. Evidence-Based Approach in the Social Area: Basic Concepts and Guidelines, History, Prospects [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2020. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–26. DOI: 10.17759/ssc.2020010101. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Apel` K.O. Transformaciya filosofii. Per. s nem. V. Kurennogo, B. Skuratova [The Philosophy transformation, translated from German by V. Kurennoy, B. Skuratov]. Moscow: Logos, 2001. 339 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Busygina N.P. Nauchnyi status metodologii issledovaniya sluchaev [Scientific status of case study methodology]. Moskovskij psixoterapevticheskij zhurnal = Moscow psychotherapeutic journal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 9—34. (In Russ.).
  3. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa [Methodological meaning of psychological schism]. Voprosy psixologii = Voprosy Psychologii, 1996, no. 6, pp. 25—40. (In Russ.).
  4. Vasilyuk F.E. Ponimayushhaya psixoterapiya kak psixotexnicheskaya sistema. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Understanding psychotherapy as a psychotechnical system. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 472 p.
  5. Gadamer X.G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki: Per. s nem. Obshh. red. i vstup. st. B.N. Bessonova [Truth and Method: Fundamentals of Philosophical Hermeneutics: translation from German, general edition and introduction B.N. Bessonova]. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 704 p.
  6. Arnd-Caddigan M., Pozzuto R. Evidence-based practice and the purpose of clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 2010. Vol. 80, pp. 35—53.
  7. Bellamy J.L., Bledsoe S.E., Mullen E.J., Fang L., Manuel J. Agency-university partnerships for evidence-based practice in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 2008. Vol. 44, pp. 55—75.
  8. Drisko J. Common factors. In Roberts A. (ed.). The Social Worker’s Desk Reference. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 220—225.
  9. Drisko J., Grady M. Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Springer, 2012.
  10. Drisko J., Grady M. Evidence-based practice in social work: A contemporary perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 2015. Vol. 43, pp. 274—282.
  11. Elliott R. Qualitative methods for studying psychotherapy change process. In Harper D., Thompson A.R. (eds.). Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 69—82.
  12. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA,1992. Vol. 268(17), pp. 2420—2425.
  13. Fischer J. Is casework effective? A review. Social Work, 1973. Vol. 18(1), pp. 5—20. DOI:10.1093/ sw/18.1.5
  14. Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 2006. Vol. 12 (2), pp. 219—245.
  15. Gambrill E.D. Evidence-based practice: an alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 2018. Vol. 99(3), pp. 283—294. DOI:10.1177/1044389418786699
  16. Gambrill E.D. Evidence-based practice: Sea change or emperor’s new clothes. Journal of Social Work Education, 2003. Vol. 39, pp. 3—23.
  17. Gibbs L.E. Evidence-Based Practice for the Helping Professions: A Practical Guide with Integrated Multimedia. Paific Grove, CA: Brooks in Cole-Thompson Learning, 2003. 292 p.
  18. Gilgun J. The four cornerstones of evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 2005. Vol. 15 (1), pp. 52—61.
  19. Grady M.D., Rozas L.W., Bledsoe S.E. Are curriculum decisions based on the evidence? How social work faculty members make choices in curriculum decisions. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 2010. Vol. 7, pp. 466—480.
  20. Gray M., Plath D., Webb S. Evidence-Based Social Work: A Critical Stance. London: Routledge, 2009. 240 p.
  21. Højholt Ch., Kousholt D. Developing knowledge through participation and collaboration: research as mutual learning processes. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2019. Vol. 16, pp. 575—604. Available at: https://thediscourseunit.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/0575.pdf (Accessed: 25.09.2020)
  22. Højholt Ch., Schraube E. Subjectivity and Knowledge: Generalization in the Psychological Study of Everyday Life. Springer, 2019. 250 p.
  23. Lorenz W. Practicing history: Memory and contemporary professional practice. International Social Work, 2007. Vol. 50(5), pp. 597—612.
  24. McNeece C.A., Thyer B.A. Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 2004. Vol. 1(1), pp. 7—25.
  25. Mullen E.J. Reconsidering the “idea” of evidence in evidence-based policy & practice. European Journal of Social Work, 2015a, pp. 310—335.
  26. Mullen E.J. Should social work be evidence-based? 2015b. Available at: https://blog.oup.com/2015/11/ social-work-evidence-based (Accessed: 25.09.2020)
  27. Mullen E.J., Dumpson J.R. (Eds.) Evaluation of Social Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972. 282 p.
  28. Mullen E.J., Streiner D.L. The evidence for and against evidence-based practice. In Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. (eds.). Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 21—34.
  29. Norcross J.C. (Ed.) Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Evidence-Based Responsiveness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  30. Okpych N.J., Yu J.L.H. A historical analysis of evidence-based practice in social work: the unfinished journey toward an empirically grounded profession. Social Service Review, 2014. Vol. 88(1), pp. 3—58.
  31. Parrish D., Rubin A. An effective model for continuing education training in evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 2011. Vol. 21(1), pp. 77—87.
  32. Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. (Eds.) Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 440 p.
  33. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 1996. Vol. 312(7023), pp. 71—72.
  34. Straus S.E., Richardson W.S., Haynes R.B., Glasziou P. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2005. 315 p.
  35. Torrey W.C., Drake R.E., Dicxon L., Burns B.J., Flynn L., Rush A.J. et al. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 2001. Vol. 52, pp. 45—50.
  36. Webb S. Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 2001. Vol. 31(1), pp. 57—79.
  37. Wike T., Bledsoe S.E., Manuel J., Despard M., Johnson L., Bellamy J., Killian-Farrell C. Evidence-based practice in social work: Challenges and opportunities for clinicians and organizations. Clinical Social Work, 2014. Vol. 42, pp. 161—170.
  38. Zwet R van der. Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Shared Responsibility. Ipskamp Drukkers BV, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2018. 172 p.

Information About the Authors

Natalya P. Busygina, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, Chair of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543, e-mail: boussyguina@yandex.ru

Tatiana G. Podushkina, Head of the Sector «Center for Evidence-Based Social Design», Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-8342, e-mail: poduschkina@mail.ru

Victor V. Stanilevsky, MS in International Affairs, American University, Washington, USA, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-7387, e-mail: victor.stanilevskiy@gmail.com



Total: 1495
Previous month: 71
Current month: 18


Total: 1640
Previous month: 60
Current month: 41