Сиблинговые отношения и их роль в жизни человека

В статье представлены результаты исследований сиблинговых отношений, выполненных в разных подходах. Статьи, вошедшие в данный обзор, посвящены характеру отношений с братьями и сестрами в разных возрастах, их роли в развитии агрессивного и просоциального поведения, отношения к себе и своему телу, удовлетворенности жизнью. Сиблинговые отношения рассматриваются в контексте всей семейной систем. Отмечается, что отношения между кровными братьями/сестрами непроизвольны, устойчивы и характеризуются высокой степенью непосредственности. Показано, что характер общения с братьями и сестрами связан благополучием человека и особенностями его адаптации в детстве, подростковом и в зрелом возрастах.

1. Bu F., Sulloway F.J. Birth Order and Parental Investment // Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science / Eds. V. Weekes-Shackelford, T. Shackelford, V. Weekes-Shackelford. Cham: Springer, 2016. P. 1–6. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3586-1
2. Chen BB. Chinese Adolescents' Sibling Conflicts: Links with Maternal Involvement in Sibling Relationships and Coparenting // Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2019. Vol. 29. № 3. P. 752–762. DOI:10.1111/jora.12413
3. Children's Vulnerability to Interparental Conflict: The Protective Role of Sibling Relationship Quality / P.T. Davies [et al.] // Child Development. 2019. Vol. 90. № 6. P. 2118–2134. DOI:10.1111/cdev.13078
4. Damian, R.I., Roberts, B.W. The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students // Journal of Research in Personality. 2015. Vol. 58. P. 96–105. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.05.005
5. Diluted Competition? Conflicts between Full- and Half-Siblings in Two Adult Generations / A.O. Tanskanen [et al.] // Frontiers in Sociology. 2016. Vol. 1. Article ID 6. 11  p. DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2016.00006
6. Don’t Touch: Developmental Trajectories of Toddlers’ Behavioral Regulation Related to Older Siblings’ Behaviors and Parental Discipline / S. van Berkel [et al.] // Social Development. 2020. Vol. 29. № 4. P. 1031–150. DOI:10.1111/sode.12440
7. Family Violence, Sibling, and Peer Aggression During Adolescence: Associations with Behavioral Health Outcomes / K.M. Ingram [et al.] // Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 11. Article ID 26. 14  p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00026
8. Foody M., Samara M., OˊHiggins Norman J. Bullying by siblings and peers: Poly‐setting victimization and the association with problem behaviours and depression // Educational Psychology. 2020. Vol. 90. № S1. P. 138–157. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12311
9. Francka B., Lindell A.K., Campione-Barr N. The Relative Impacts of Sibling Relationships on Adolescent Body Perceptions // The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2019. Vol. 180. № 2–3. P. 130–143. DOI:10.1080/00221325.2019.1602024
10. Greer K.B., Campione-Barr N., Lindell A.K. Body Talk: Siblings’ Use of Positive and Negative Body Self-Disclosure and Associations with Sibling Relationship Quality and Body-Esteem // Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2015. Vol. 44. P. 1567–1579. DOI:10.1007/s10964-014-0180-1
11. Hall E.D., Shebib S.J. Interdependent Siblings: Associations between Closest and Least Close Sibling Social Support and Sibling // Relationship Satisfaction, Communication Studies. 2020. Vol. 71. № 4. P. 612–632. DOI:10.1080/10510974.2020.1749862
12. Howe N., Rosciszewska J., Persram R. “I'm an ogre so I'm very hungry!” “I'm assistant ogre”: The Social Function of Sibling Imitation in Early Childhood // Infant and Child Development. 2018. Vol. 27. № 1. Article ID e2040. 17  p. DOI:10.1002/icd.2040
13. Jensen A., Whiteman S., Fingerman K. “Can’t Live With or Without Them:” Transitions and Young Adults’ Perceptions of Sibling Relationships // Journal of Family Psychology. 2018. Vol. 32. № 3. P. 385–395. DOI:10.1037/fam0000361
14. Jensen A.C., Nielson M.K., Yorgason J.B. The longest lasting relationship: Patterns of contact and well-being among mid to later life siblings // The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2020. Vol. 75. № 10. P. 2240–2249. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbz083
15. Lee B., Padilla J., McHale S.M. Transmission of work ethic n African-American families and its links with adolescent adjustment // Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2016. Vol. 45. P. 2278–2291. DOI:10.1007/s10964-015-0391-0
16. Lehmann J-Y K., Nuevo-Chiquero A., Vidal-Fernandez M. The Early Origins of Birth Order Differences in Children’s Outcomes and Parental [Электронный ресурс] // Behavior Human Resources Winter. 2018. Vol. 53. № 1. P. 123–156. URL: http://jhr.uwpress.org/content/53/1/123.refs (дата обращения: 11.11.2021).
17. Lindell A.K., Campione-Barr N. Continuity and change in the amily system across the transition from adolescence to emerging adult-hood // Marriage & Family Review. 2016. Vol. 53. № 4. P. 388–416. DOI:10.1080/01494929.2016.1184212
18. Lindell A.K., Campione-Barr, N., Greer, K.B. Associations between adolescent sibling conflict and relationship quality during the transition to college // Emerging Adulthood. 2014. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 79–91. DOI:10.1177/2167696813502778
19. Lucas-Thompson R.G., George M.W. Are there individual and sibling differences in appraisals of interparental conflict? // Journal of Family Psychology. 2017. Vol. 31. № 7. P. 933–938. DOI:10.1037/fam0000326
20. Milevsky A. Sibling dynamics in adulthood: a qualitative analysis // Marriage & Family Review. 2020. Vol. 56. № 2. P. 91–108. DOI:10.1080/01494929.2019.1655127
21. Mothers’ and fathers’ sensitivity with their two children: A longitudinal study from infancy to early childhood / E.T. Hallers-Haalboom [et al.] // Developmental Psychology. 2017. Vol. 53. № 5. P. 860–872. DOI:10.1037/dev0000293
22. Pike A., Oliver B.R. Child behavior and sibling relationship quality: A cross-lagged analysis // Journal of Family Psychology. 2017. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 250–255. DOI:10.1037/fam0000248
23. Portner L.C., Riggs S.A. Sibling Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: Associations with Parent–Child Relationship // Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015. Vol. 25. P. 1755–1764. DOI:10.1007/s10826-015-0358-5
24. Prime H., Plamondon A., Jenkins J. Birth order and preschool children's cooperative abilities: A within-family analysis // British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2017. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 392–405. DOI:10.1111/bjdp.12180
25. Reconsidering the links between sibship size, maternal sensitivity, and child attachment: A multidimensional interactive approach / A. Bernier [et al.] // Journal of Family Psychology. 2018. Vol. 32. № 3. P. 396–405. DOI:10.1037/fam0000387
26. Relational Aggression in Preschool Students: An Exploration of the Variables of Sex, Age, and Siblings / K. Morine [et al.] // Hindawi Publishing Corporation Child Development Research. 2011. Vol. 2011. Article ID 931720. 6  p. DOI:10.1155/2011/931720
27. Rohrer J.M., Egloff B., Schmukle S.C. Examining the effects of birth order on personality // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015. Vol. 112. № 46. P. 14224–14229. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1506451112
28. Rohrer J.M., Egloff B., Schmukle S.C. Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis // Psychological Science. 2017. Vol. 28. № 12. P. 1821–1832. DOI:10.1177/0956797617723726
29. Sibling Conflict and Parental Discipline: The Mediating Role of Family Communication in Portuguese Adolescents / I.C. Relva [et al.] // Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2019. Vol. 36. P. 295–304. DOI:10.1007/s10560-019-00600-3
30. Steinbach A., Hank K. Full-, Half-, and Step-Sibling Relations in Young and Middle Adulthood // Journal of Family Issues. 2018. Vol. 39. № 9. P. 2639–2658. DOI:10.1177/0192513X18757829
31. Sulloway F.J. Birth Order // Encyclopedia of Creativity / Eds. M.A. Runco, S.R. Pritzker. Second Edition. Boston: Elsevier, 2011. P. 149–158. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00030-3
32. Tavassoli N., Recchia H., Ross H. Preschool Children’s Prosocial Responsiveness to Their Siblings’ Needs in Naturalistic Interactions: A Longitudinal Study // Early Education and Development. 2019. Vol. 30. № 6. P. 1–19. DOI:10.1080/10409289.2019.1599095
33. The Maternal Emotional Climate Predicts Twin Sibling Relationship Quality / K. Mark [et al.] // Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2017. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 150–160. DOI:10.1017/thg.2017.8
34. The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: A multilevel study of multiple dyads per family / J. Jenkins [et al.] // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2012. Vol. 53. № 6. P. 622–629. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02484.x
35. White N., Hughes C. Why siblings matter: The role of brother and sister relationships in development and well-being. London: Routledge, 2017. 162 р. DOI:10.4324/9781315630489
36. Wolke D., Tippett N., Dantchev S. Bullying in the family: sibling bullying // Lancet Psychiatry. 2015. Vol. 2. № 10. P. 917–929. DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00262-X
37. Wu K., Kim J.H.J., Nagata D.K. Perception of Sibling Relationships and Birth Order Among Asian American and European American Emerging Adults // Journal of Family Issues. 2018. Vol. 39. № 13. P. 3641–3663. DOI:10.1177/0192513X18783465
38. Yaremych H.E., Volling B.L. Sibling relationships and mothers’ and fathers’ emotion socialization practices: a within-family perspective // Early Child Development and Care. 2020. Vol. 190. № 2. P. 195–209. DOI:10.1080/03004430.2018.1461095

PlumX

Метрики публикации