Исследование роли ChatGPT в специальном образовании: потенциальные возможности и вызовы

Контекст и актуальность. Рост использования искусственного интеллекта (ИИ), особенно ChatGPT, в общем и специальном образовании открывает инновационные возможности для индивидуального обучения и разработки индивидуальных образовательных программ (ИОП) для обучающихся с особыми образовательными потребностями (ООП). Цель. Настоящий обзор направлен на анализ потенциальных преимуществ для осуществления образовательного процесса, практических приложений и этических вызовов использования ChatGPT в поддержке инклюзивного образования. Методы и материалы. Проведен исследовательский обзор современной международной литературы, эмпирических исследований и профессиональных мнений, посвященных роли ChatGPT в инклюзивной педагогике. Результаты. ChatGPT способствует повышению эффективности работы педагогов при разработке индивидуальных учебных планов, формулировании согласованных целей ИОП и снижении рабочей нагрузки, что особенно важно для начинающих специалистов. Однако выявлены ограничения, включая недостаточное понимание контекста, риски алгоритмических искажений данных, а также этические проблемы, связанные с конфиденциальностью, дезинформацией и академической добросовестностью. Выводы. Эффективная интеграция ChatGPT в образовательный процесс требует целенаправленного профессионального развития педагогов и постоянного человеческого контроля для обеспечения этичного использования технологий, защиты персональных данных и поддержания справедливого и качественного обучения для всех обучающихся.

1. Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M.H., Cansu, F.K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
2. Alshahrani, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2029—2040. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.010
3. AlZu’bi, S., Mughaid, A., Quiam, F., Hendawi, S. (2024). Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of ChatGPT and Alternative Big Language Models. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2(1), 28— https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewaia3202820
4. Baidoo-Anu, D., Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52— https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
5. Baytak, A. (2024). The Content Analysis of the Lesson Plans Created by ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 329—350. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.19
6. Božić, V., Poola, I. (2023). Chat GPT and education.
7. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., Liu, C. (2022). Two Decades of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Contributors, Collaborations, Research Topics, Challenges, and Future Directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28— https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
8. Cotton, D.R., Cotton, P.A., Shipway, J.R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228— https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
9. Giannini, S. (2023). Reflections on generative AI and the future of education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/HOXG8740
10. Giaouri, S., Charisi, M. (2025). Enhancing IEP design in inclusive primary settings through ChatGPT: A mixed-methods study with special educators. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081065
11. Gupta, P.K., Raturi, S., Venkateswarlu, P. (2023). ChatGPT for Designing Course Outlines: A Boon or Bane to Modern Technology. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4386113
12. Herft, A. (2023). A Teacher's Prompt Guide to ChatGPT aligned with 'What Works Best'. CESE NSW.
13. Jarrah, A.M., Wardat, Y., Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
14. Karaman, M.R., Göksu, İ. (2024). Are Lesson Plans Created by ChatGPT More Effective? An Experimental Study. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 107—127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.607
15. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B.L., Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537— https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
16. Küchemann, S., Steinert, S., Revenga, N., Schweinberger, M., Dinc, Y., Avila, K.E., Kuhn, J. (2023). Can ChatGPT support prospective teachers in physics task development? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020128
17. Lee, G.G., Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for Science Learning: A Study on Pre-service Teachers' Lesson Planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13711.76965
18. Li, Y., Liu, J., Yang, S. (2024). Is ChatGPT a Good Middle School Teacher? An Exploration of its Role in Instructional Design. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education, NMDME, October 13-15, 2023, Xi’an, China. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-10-2023.2341343
19. Li, A., Ye, L. (2023). The influence of ChatGPT on the professional development of elementary education teachers and its countermeasures. In R.J. Dwyer (Ed.), Digitalization and management innovation II: Proceedings of DMI 2023 (Vol. 376, pp. 304—310). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA230742
20. Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., Wang, F.L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7
21. Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
22. Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J.K., Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for Teachers: Practical Examples for Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Educational Purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10(3), 200—205. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijves.ijves_37_23
23. Özdemir, R., Kisaç, B., Ünlü, E., Kaplan, G. (2020). The investigation of quality indicators of individualized education plan prepared in public schools. European Journal of Special Education Research, 6(1), 129—141. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v6i1.3164
24. Papadakis, S. (Ed.). (2025). AI in early education: Integrating artificial intelligence for inclusive and effective learning. John Wiley & Sons.
25. Rahman, M.M., Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
26. Rakap, S. (2023). Chatting with GPT: Enhancing Individualized Education Program Goal Development for Novice Special Education Teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 339— https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231211295
27. Rakap, S., Balikci, S. (2024). Enhancing IEP Goal Development for Preschoolers with Autism: A Preliminary Study on ChatGPT Integration. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06343-0
28. Rakap, S., Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., Kalkan, S. (2019). How complete are individualized education programmes developed for students with disabilities served in inclusive classroom settings? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(5), 663— https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1580840
29. Rizos, I., Foykas, E., Georgakopoulos, S.V. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487
30. Ruble, L.A., McGrew, N., Dalrymple, Jung, L.A. (2010). Examining the Quality of IEPs for Young Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1459—1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1003-1
31. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342— https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
32. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M.A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D.T., Huang, R., Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
33. Waterfield, D.A., Coleman, O.F., Welker, N.P., Kennedy, M.J., McDonald, S.D., Cook, B.G. (2025). IEPs in the Age of AI: Examining IEP Goals Written with and Without ChatGPT. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1— https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251324592
34. Yilmaz Can, D., Durmuş, C. (2024). From AI-Generated Lesson Plans to the Real-Life Classes: Explored by Pre-Service Teachers. In 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24), June 18-21, 2024, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd24.2024.17060
35. Zemljak, D. (2023). Advanced tools for education: ChatGPT-based learning preparations. Natural Science Education, 20(1), 10— https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/23.20.10