Парадигма максимизации полезности и ее обобщения (обзор одного направления исследований)

Рассматриваются различные версии парадигмы максимизации полезности и задача представления предпочтений и функций выбора функциями полезности. Приводятся результаты в классическом случае (при отсутствии порога сравнения) и с порогом, зависящим от одной альтернативы. Построены модели, в которых порог зависит от двух сравниваемых альтернатив и/или допустимого множества альтернатив. Предложена и проанализирована модель выбора, описывающая концепцию выбора Г. Саймона.

1.   Агаев Р., Алескеров Ф. Обобщенные механизмы интервального выбора и порождаемые ими функции // Автоматика и телемеханика. 1993. № 4. C. 662-671.
2.   Айзерман М.А., Алескеров Ф.Т. Выбор вариантов (основы теории). М.: Наука, 1990.
3.   Алескеров Ф.Т. Простые и простейшие полупорядки // Доклады РАН. 2002. Т. 387. С. 175-177.
4.   Алескеров Ф.Т. Пороговая полезность, выбор и бинарные отношения // Автоматика и телемеханика. 2003. № 3. C. 8-27.
5.   Алескеров Ф.Т., Бауман Е.В., Вольский В.И. Методы обработки интервальных экспертных оценок // Автоматика и телемеханика. 1984. № 3. С. 384-389.
6.   Миркин Б.Г. Проблема группового выбора. М.: Наука, 1974.
7.   Agaev R., Aleskerov F. Interval choice: classic and general cases // Mathematical Social Sciences. 1993. 26 (3). 249-272.
8.   Aizerman M., Aleskerov F. Theory of Choice. North­Holland, Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam, 1995.
9.   Aleskerov F. Multicriterial interval choice models // Information Sciences. 1994. 80 (1 and 2). 25-41.
10.   Aleskerov F. Binary representation of choice rationalizable by a utility function and an additive non­negative error function // Mathematical Social Sciences. 2002. 43 (2). 177-185.
11.   Aleskerov F., Masatl[1]oğlu Y. Utility representation via additive or multiplicative error functions // Discrete Applied Mathematics. 2003. 127 (2). 181-197.
12.   Aleskerov F., Monjardet B. Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
13.   Aleskerov F., Vol'skiy V. Choice of the best variants on binary relations and the ex­ tremizational choice // Preprints of 10th World Congress on Automatic Control. 1987. Vol. 5. FRG, Munich.
14.   Armstrong W. The determinateness of the utility function // Economic Journal. 1939. 49. 453-467.
15.   Armstrong W. A note on the theory of consumer's behavior // Oxford Economics Papers, N.S. 1950. 2. 119-122.
16.   Arrow K. Rational choice functions and orderings // Economica. 1959. 26. 121-127.
17.   Aumann R. Rationality and bounded rationality. Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lecture, J.L. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 1986.
18.   Bej A., Gilboa I. Numerical representations of imperfectly ordered preferences (A unified geometric exposition) // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1992. 36. 426-449.
19.   Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation. London: Athlone Press, 1970.
20.   Birkhoff G. Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence. R.I., 1948.
21.   Blaug M. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
22.   Bosi B., Candeal J.C., Indurбin E., Oloriz E., Zudaire M. Numerical representations of interval orders // Order. 2001. 18. 171-190.
23.   Bosi G., Isle R. Representing preferences with nontransitive indifference by a single realalued function // Journal of Mathematical Economic. 1995. 24. 621-631.
24.   Bouyssou D., Pirlot M. Preferences for multiattributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 2004. 48 (3). 167-185.
25.   Bridges D.S., Mehta G.B. Representation of Preference Orderings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
26.   Candeal J.C., Indurбin E., Zudaire M. Numerical representability of semiorders // Mathematical Social Sciences. 2002. 43 (1). 61-77.
27.   Cantor G. Beitrage zur begrungung der transfiniten mengenlehre // Mathematische Annalen. 1895. 46. 486-512.
28.   Chipman J.S. The foundations of utility // Econometrica. 1960. 28. 193-224.
29.   Deb R. Binariness and rational choice // Mathematical Social Sciences. 1983. 5 (1). 97-105.
30.   Doignon J.-P. Generalization of interval orders // E. Degreef, J. Van Buggenhaut (eds.). Trends in Mathematical Psychology. Elsevier, 1984. 209-217.
31.   Doignon J.-P., Ducamp A., Falmagne J.-C. On realizable biorders and the biorder dimension of a relation // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1984. 28. 73-109.
32.   Doignon J.-P., Monjardet B., Roubens M., Vincke Ph. Biorder families, valued relations and preference modeling // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1986. 30. 435-480.
33.   Ducamp A., Falmagne J.C. Composite measurement // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1969. 6 (3). 359-90.
34.   Falmagne J.C. Elements of Psychophysical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
35.   Fechne G.T. Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Hartel, 1860.
36.   Fishburn P.C. Utility Theory for Decision Making.. New York: Wiley, 1970.
37.   Fishburn P.C. Intransitive Indifference with Unequal Indifference Intervals // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1970. 7. 144-149.
38.   Fishburn P.C. Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1973. 10. 91-105.
39.   Fishburn P.C. Generalizations of semiorders: a review note // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1997. 41. 357-366.
40.   Fishburn P.C., Monjardet B. Norbert Wiener on the theory of measurement (1914, 1915, 1921) // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1992. 35 (2). 865-885.
41.   Georgescu-Roegen N. The pure theory of consumer's behavior // Quaterly Journal of Economics. 1936. 50. 545-593.
42.   Houthakker H.S. Revealed preference and the utility function // Economica. 1950. 17. 159-174.
43.   Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choice, Values and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
44.   Krant D.H. Extensive measurement in semiorders // Philosophy of Science. 1967. 34. 348-362.
45.   Krantz D.H., Luce R.D., Suppes P., Tversky A. Foundations of measurement, Additive and polynomial representations, 1. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
46.   Krep D. Notes on the Theory of Choice. Vestview Press, Boulder and London, 1988.
47.   Luce R.D. Semi­orders and a theory of utility discrimination // Econometrica. 1956. 24 (2). 178-191.
48.   Manders K.L On JND representations of semiorders // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1981. 24. 224-248.
49.   Mirkin B.G. Description of some relations on the set of real­line intervals // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1972. 9. 243-252.
50.   Monjardet B. Intervals, intervals... // Order. 1988. 5. 211-219.
51.   Nakamura Y. Semimetric thresholds for finite posets // Mathematical Social Sciences. 2002. 44. 37-43.
52.   Ozbay E.Y. Numerical Representation of Binary Relations with Multiplicative Error Function: A General Case // A. Tangian, J. Gruber (eds.). Constructing and Applying Objective Functions. Berlin: Springer, 2002. P. 75-88.
53.   Pareto V. Cours d'Economie Politique. Lausanne: Rouge, 1889.
54.   Pirlot M., Vincke Ph. Semiorders: Properties, Representations, Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
55.   Poincarй H. La Valeur de la Science. Paris: Flammarion, 1903.
56.   Richter M.K. Revealed preference theory // Econometrica. 1966. 34. 635-645.
57.   Richter M.K. Rational choice // J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter, H.F. Sonnenshein (eds.). Preference, Utility and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.
58.   Riguet J. Les relations de Ferrers C.R. // Academie des Sciences. 1951. 232. 1729-1730.
59.   Roberts F.S. Measurement theory // Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. London: Addison­Wesley, 1979. Vol. 7.
60.   Roubens M., Vincke Ph. Preference Modelling, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin: Springer, 1985.
61.   Samuelson P. A note on the pure theory of consumers behavior // Economica. 1938. 5. 61-71, 353-354.
62.   Schrцder E. Vorlesungen uber die Algebra der Logik. Leipzig, 1890-1895. Vol. 3.
63.   Schwartz T. Rationality and the myth of maximum // Nфus. 1972. 6. 97-117.
64.   Scott D., Suppes P. Foundational aspects of theories of measurement // Journal of Symbolic Logic. 1958. 23. 113-128.
65.   Sen A. Rational behavior // J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.).The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan, 1987. 4. 68-76.
66.   Sen A. Internal consistency of choice // Econometrica. 1993. 61 (3). 495-521.
67.   Sen A. The formulation of rational choice // American Economic Review. 1994. 84. 385-390.
68.   Sen A. Maximization and the act of choice // Econometrica. 1997. 65 (4). 745-779.
69.   Simon H. Models of Bounded Rationality // Collected papers. Cambridge: The MIT Press, MA, 1982.
70.   Subiza B. Numerical representation of acyclic preferences // Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1994. 38. 467-476.
71.   Suppes P., Krantz D.H., Luce R.D., Tversky A. Foundations of measurement. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations. New York: Academic Press, 1989. Vol. 2.
72.   Tversky A. Intransitivity of preferences // Psychological Review. 1969. 76. 31-48.
73.   Wiener N. A contribution to the theory of relative position // Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1914. 17. 441-449.