Factors of psychological safety of the personality of a student of a psychological and pedagogical university

 
Audio is AI-generated
50

Abstract

Context and relevance. The social situation of human development is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and unpredictability, which requires people to be able to function effectively under constant stress while maintaining the potential for personal growth and self-development. These challenges emphasize the importance of research in the field of psychological safety — a scientific discipline that studies the conditions that contribute to the safe development of the individual and the mechanisms of environmental influence on the psychological well-being of people. Psychological safety of the educational environment of a higher education institution is considered an integral condition for ensuring academic effectiveness and as a key factor contributing to the social well-being of society as a whole. Objective — to assess the psychological safety of students of a psychological and pedagogical university in different courses of study. Hypothesis. Students at higher education institutions have different levels of psychological safety at different stages of their studies. Methods and materials. The study involved 99 MSUPE students (bachelor's, specialist's, master's degree; Mage = 24.67; 84,8% women). Methodological basis: the structure of psychological security of the individual (Kostina L.V., 2023) based on the components: the stability of the individual in the environment, resistance (resilience) to internal and external influences, the experience of security/insecurity of the individual and the effectiveness of activities. Results. Nonlinear dynamics of students' psychological safety depending on the course of study was revealed. The relationship between the components of psychological safety and academic performance was confirmed. Conclusions. Determinants influencing the level of psychological safety of students have been identified (field of study, age, personality traits).

General Information

Keywords: psychological safety, students, stability of the individual in the environment, resilience, experience of security/insecurity of the individual, academic performance

Journal rubric: Axiological and Personality-Oriented Basis of Cooperation and Interaction of Educational Environment Subjects

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/bppe.2025220309

Received 05.06.2025

Revised 09.09.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Belevtsova, M.R., Boykina, E.E. (2025). Factors of psychological safety of the personality of a student of a psychological and pedagogical university. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 22(3), 142–155. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/bppe.2025220309

© Belevtsova M.R., Boykina E.E., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Агузумцян, Р.В., Галстян, А.С., Мурадян, Е.Б. (2010). Психологическая безопасность личности студента. Вестник практической психологии образования, 7(2), 56—63. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/bppe/archive/2010_n2/34622 (дата обращения: 20.05.2025).
    Aguzumtsyan, R.V., Galstyan, A.S., Muradyan, E.B. (2010). Psychological safety of the student's personality. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 7(2), 56—63. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/bppe/archive/2010_n2/34622 (viewed: 20.05.2025).
  2. Алексеев, А.А., Аверин, В.А., Баканова, А.А., Ван, Х., Веселова, Е.К., Карпова, С.В., Коржова, Е.Ю., Королева, И.В., Лактионова, Е.Б., Манёров, В.Х., Медведев, Д.А., Носкова, Т.Н., Павлова, Т.Б., Регуш, Л.А., Турчин, А.С., Шингаев, С.М. (2020). Психологическое сопровождение личности в меняющемся мире. СПб: Издательство Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43000184 (дата обращения: 20.05.2025).
    Alekseev, A.A., Averin, V.A., Bakanova, A.A., Van, Kh., Veselova, E.K., Karpova, S.V., Korzhova, E.Yu., Koroleva, I.V., Laktionova, E.B., Manerov, V.H., Medvedev, D.A., Noskova,T.N., Pavlova, T.B., Regush, L.A., Turchin, A.S., Shingaev, S.M. (2020). Psychological support for individuals in a changing world. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43000184 (viewed: 20.05.2025).
  3. Ананьев, Б.Г. (2005). Психология и проблемы человекознания (А.А. Бодалев, ред.). М.: Российская академия образования, Московский психолого-социальный институт.
    Anan'ev, B.G. (2005). Psychology and problems of human studies (A.A. Bodalev, ed.). Moscow: Russian Academy of Education Publ., Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Publ. (In Russ.).
  4. Баева, И.А. (2017). Психологическая безопасность образовательной среды в структуре комплексной безопасности образовательной организации. Казанский педагогический журнал, 6(125), 12—18. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30611526 (дата обращения: 20.05.2025).
    Baeva, I.A. (2017). Psychological security of educational environment in the structure of integrated security of educational organization. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 6(125), 12—18. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30611526 (viewed: 20.05.2025).
  5. Баева, И.А. (2024). Психологическая безопасность образовательной среды: становление направления и перспективы развития. Экстремальная психология и безопасность личности, 1(3), 5—19. https://doi.org/10.17759/epps.2024010301
    Baeva, I.A. (2024). Psychological Safety of the Educational Environment: Formation of Directions and Development Prospects. Extreme Psychology and Personal Safety, 1(3), 5—19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/epps.2024010301
  6. Благодырь, Е.М. (2011). Формирование представлений о безопасном поведении человека как предмете психологической науки. Прикладная психология и психоанализ, 4, Статья1. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21997664 (дата обращения: 25.03.2025).
    Blagodyr, E.M. (2011). Formation of ideas about safe human behavior as a subject of psychological science. Applied Psychology and Psychoanalysis, 4, Article 1. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21997664 (viewed: 20.03.2025).
  7. Елисеев, О.П. (1994). Конструктивная типология и психодиагностика личности. Псков: Издательство Псковского областного института усовершенствования учителей.
    Eliseev, O.P. (1994). Constructive typology and psychodiagnostics of personality. Pskov: Publishing House of the Pskov Regional Teachers-in-Service Institute. (In Russ.).
  8. Заплатинский, В.М. (2000). Терминология науки о безопасности. М.: Юрайт.
    Zaplatinskiy, V.M. (2000). Terminology of Security Scien Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).
  9. Зеленков, М.Ю. (2002). Правовые основы общей теории безопасности Российского государства в XXI веке. М.: Юридический институт МИИТа.
    Zelenkov, M.Yu. (2002). The legal foundations of the general theory of security of the Russian state in the 21st century. Moscow: The Law Institute of Moscow Institute of Engineering Transport Publ. (In Russ.).
  10. Костина, Л.М. (2023). Психологическая безопасность личности субъекта образования на этапе перехода на следующую ступень обучения: Дис. … д-ра психол. наук: 5.3.4 Педагогическая психология, психодиагностика цифровых образовательных сред (психологические науки). СПб.
    Kostina, L.M. (2023). Psychological safety of the personality of the subject of education at the stage of transition to the next level of education: Dr. Sci. (Psychol.): 5.3.4 Educational psychology, psychodiagnostics of digital educational environments (psychological sciences). Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  11. Котик, М.А. (1987). Психология и безопасность. Таллинн: Валгус.
    Kotik, M.A. (1987). Psychology and safety. Tallinn: Valgus Publ. (In Russ.).
  12. Леонова, О.И., Поликаркина, Е.И. (2014). Механизмы создания психологически безопасной образовательной среды в образовательной организации общего образования. Психологическая наука и образование, 6(3), 276—285. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2014060326
    Leonova, O.I., Polikarkina, E.I. (2014). Mechanisms for Creating a Psychologically Safe Learning Environment in an Educational Institution of General Education. Psychological Science and Education, 6(3), 276—285. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2014060326
  13. Леонтьев, Д.А., Рассказова, Е.И. (2006). Тест жизнестойкости. Методическое руководство. М.: Смысл.
    Leontiev, D.A., Rasskazova, E.I. (2006). Vitality Test. Methodological Guide. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.).
  14. Мотков, О.И. (1998). Методика «Жизненное предназначение». Школьный психолог, 36.
    Motkov, O.I. (1998). Methodology «Life's Purpose». School Psychologist, 36. (In Russ.).
  15. Никифоров, Г.С. (1989). Самоконтроль человека. Л.: Изд-во ЛГУ.
    Nikiforov, G.S. (1989). Self-control of a person. Leningrad: Publishing house of Leningrad State University. (In Russ.).
  16. Райгородский, Д.Я. (2001). Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты. Учебное пособие. Самара: Издательский Дом «БАХРАХ-М».
    Rajgorodsky, D.Ya. (2001). Practical Psychodiagnostics. Methods and Tests. Educational Guide. Samara: BAKHRAH-M Publishing House. (In Russ.).
  17. Frazier, M.L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R.L., Pezeshkan, A., Vracheva, V. (2016). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113—165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
  18. Gao, X. (2023). Academic stress and academic burnout in adolescents: a moderated mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1133706 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133706
  19. Higgins, M., Ishimaru, A., Holcombe, R., Fowler, A. (2012). Examining organizational learning in schools: The role of psychological safety, experimentation, and leadership that reinforces learning. Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 67—94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9175-9

Information About the Authors

Maria R. Belevtsova, Bachelor, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8023-4423, e-mail: maria_belevtsova_03@bk.ru

Ekaterina E. Boykina, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-3969, e-mail: katarinatapfer@gmail.com

Contribution of the authors

Maria R. Belevtsova — research ideas; research planning; research control. application of statistical, mathematical or other methods for data analysis;

Ekaterina E. Boykina — theoretical and methodological substantiation of the study; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript; planning the study; description of the interpretation of the results.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 164
Previous month: 70
Current month: 9

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 50
Previous month: 20
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 214
Previous month: 90
Current month: 10