Perfectionism of students in China, Kazakhstan and Russia in the paradigm of cultural-historical theory

 
Audio is AI-generated
 25 min read
98

Abstract

Context and Relevance. The pursuit of higher education and a successful career has become a dominant trend among contemporary youth, closely linked to the rise of perfectionism in this demographic. Within the framework of cultural-historical theory, student perfectionism should be examined through the lens of the social situation of development. Objective. This study aims to compare the levels of perfectionism among students in China, Kazakhstan, and Russia, with a specific focus on gender differences. Hypothesis. It is hypothesized that perfectionism among students from China, Kazakhstan, and Russia will differ due to the presence of socio-cultural norms that have historically evolved within each society and are transmitted through upbringing. Methods and Materials. The sample comprised 249 students from China (56,4% male, 45,4% female), 298 from Kazakhstan (40,3% male, 59,7% female), and 190 from Russia (40,5% male, 59,5% female). The Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS, Frost et al., 1990) was employed. Results. The study revealed differences between maladaptive and adaptive perfectionism traits in students across different countries. Chinese students exhibited significantly higher levels of parental criticism, while Kazakh students reported higher parental expectations, underscoring the pivotal role of cultural norms transmitted by older generations. Gender comparisons revealed that adaptive perfectionism was significantly higher among male students in China and Russia compared to their female counterparts; no such differences were observed in Kazakhstan. Conclusions. The significance of sociocultural factors in the development of student perfectionism has been empirically confirmed. The results may inform the design of psychological and pedagogical interventions for students from diverse cultural backgrounds.

General Information

Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, students, perfectionism, China, Kazakhstan, Russia

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2025210203

Received 03.12.2024

Accepted

Published

For citation: Sheraly, B.S., Zhong, T., Rogaleva, L.N., Kim, A.M., Aldabergenov, N.A. (2025). Perfectionism of students in China, Kazakhstan and Russia in the paradigm of cultural-historical theory. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 21(2), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2025210203

© Sheraly B.S., Zhong T., Rogaleva L.N., Kim A.M., Aldabergenov N.A., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Full text

Introduction

The study of perfectionism among students has gained increasing relevance due to shifting priorities among modern youth, who are increasingly oriented toward achieving high standards and building successful careers (Panina, 2020; Egan et al., 2024; Tian, Hou, 2024). This trend is driven by prevailing societal attitudes toward success and achievement (Stepanova, Smirnova, Blazevich, 2023), heightened competition (Cox, Enns, Clara, 2002), the influence of social networks (Yuzhakova, Zhelonkina, Basalaeva, 2017; Padoa, Pellegrini, Iafrate, 2018; Shu, 2023), and elevated parental expectations, which often translate into personal perfectionism among young people (Camp et al., 2022).

Research on student perfectionism is grounded in multidimensional models, proposed by R. Frost et al. (Frost et al., 1993), who identified key dimensions of perfectionism such as personal standards, organization, concern over mistakes; doubts about their own actions; parental expectations, and parental criticism. Another model by G. Flett and P. Hewitt (Flett et al., 1998) delineates three types of perfectionism: self-oriented, other-oriented, and socially prescribed perfectionism. According Hewitt, self-oriented perfectionism, which aligns with Frost’s “personal standards” and “organization,” is generally considered adaptive, as it does not entail negative consequences for the individual. In contrast, socially prescribed perfectionism, akin to maladaptive perfectionism, is characterized by the belief that one must meet the high expectations imposed by others (Flett, Hewitt et al.,1998).

Empirical studies have demonstrated that socially prescribed perfectionism is associated with increased risk of depression (Haddadi, Tamannaeifar, 2022; Liu et al., 2024), social anxiety (Gavrichenko, Bubnovskaya, 2021; Wu et al., 2022), and diminished psychological well-being among students (Rusina, 2024; Tarasova, 2021; Xu, 2023).

Conversely, adaptive perfectionism is positively correlated with high self-esteem, low anxiety, and enhanced academic integration (Permyakova, Tyukalova, Permyakov, 2024; Siah et al. 2022). Personal attributes such as self-esteem, resilience, perseverance, and self-efficacy can mitigate the negative effects of high levels of perfectionism and support psychological well-being even if level of perfectionism is high (Pham et al., 2023).

Despite the breadth of research on student perfectionism, most studies have adopted a monocultural approach. However, the growing prevalence of maladaptive perfectionism (Liu et al., 2024), — often arising from external pressures such as societal or familial expectations — highlights the need for cross-cultural investigations (Mikhailova, Farennikova, 2022; Permyakova, Sheveleva, 2015).

The present study aims to compare perfectionism among students in China, Kazakhstan, and Russia, with particular attention to gender differences. The research is grounded in cultural-historical theory, which emphasizes the importance of the “social situation of development” (Vygotsky, 1984). This concept encompasses ethnic, economic, and cultural contexts, as well as a broad spectrum of social and familial norms and values that shape the development of perfectionism among youth in different cultural and social environments (Kholmogorova, Garanyan, Tsatsulin, 2019).

The ‘cultural dimension’, as articulated in cultural-historical theory, underscores the social determinants of psychological development through the mechanism of ‘interiorization’ (Kholomogorova, 2016).

Accordingly, the study hypothesizes that student perfectionism will vary primarily due to cultural norms historically embedded in each society and transmitted through education and upbringing.

The specific hypotheses are as follows:

  1. There are differences in perfectionism indicators among Chinese, Russian, and Kazakh students. 
  2. There are gender-based differences in perfectionism among students from China, Russia, and Kazakhstan. 
  3. There are differences in perfectionism between male and female students within each country: China, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Materials and Methods

Instrument. The Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS; Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990) (Zolotareva, 2018; Stöber, 1998) was utilized. The English version was translated into Russian and Chinese using the back-translation method. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) for adaptive perfectionism was 0.946 (Chinese context) and 0.849 (Russian context); for maladaptive perfectionism, 0.943 and 0.780, respectively.

Procedure. The survey was conducted online after obtaining informed consent from all participants.

Statistical Analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparisons between two independent samples, while the Kruskal- Wallis H test was employed for comparisons among three groups as a more common test for three and more independent samples. Descriptive statistics included means and standard deviations. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0.

Participants. The study included 737 students: 249 from China (Henan Pedagogical University), 298 from Kazakhstan (Turan University, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University), and 190 from Russia (Ural Federal University) (Table 1).

Results

A comparative analysis of perfectionism among students from the three countries revealed significant differences in both maladaptive and adaptive dimensions (Table 2).

Parental Expectations: Kazakh students reported significantly higher parental expectations (H = 70,165, p ≤ 0,001; M = 16.17 ± 4,10). Pairwise comparisons confirmed statistically significant differences between Kazakh and both Chinese and Russian students (p < 0,05), as well as between Chinese and Russian students (p < 0,001).

Parental Criticism: Chinese students exhibited significantly higher parental criticism (H = 22,743, p < 0,001; M = 10,77 ± 4,09), with significant differences compared to Kazakh (p < 0,001) and Russian (p < 0,01) students. No significant difference was observed between Kazakh and Russian students.

These findings suggest that socio-cultural and familial traditions exert a stronger influence on maladaptive perfectionism among students in China and Kazakhstan compared to Russia.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample

Students

Gender

Number

Age

China

Men

136 (54,6% )

19,24 ± 1,05

Women

113 (45,4%)

19,00 ± 1,13

Kazakhstan

Men

120 (40,3%)

19,00 ± 0,79

Women

178 (59,7%)

19,80 ± 0,80

Russia

Men

89 (40, 5%)

19,50 ± 1,34

Women

101(59, 5%)

19,00 ± 1,07

Table 2. The results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism of students from China, Kazakhstan and Russia

Параметры /Parameters

China (N = 249)

Kazakhstan (N = 298)

Russia (N = 190)

Kruskal—Wallis

p

M

σ

M

σ

M

σ

1. Concern over Mistakes

24,05

9,29

25,13

6,53

24,45

6,68

1,286

0,526

2. Doubts about actions

12,43

3,63

12,43

3,03

12,48

2,89

0,256

0,88

3. arental Expectations

15,27

4,71

16,17

4,10

13,11

3,30

70,165

0,001

4. Parental criticism

10,77

4,09

9,24

3,53

9,55

3,20

22,743

0,001

5. Personal Standards

22,65

5,19

23,57

4,39

19,89

4,99

67,638

0,001

6. Organization

22,88

4,60

23,75

3,65

22,11

4,58

20,248

0,001

7. Adaptive perfectionism

45,53

8,40

47,32

6,88

42,00

8,33

54,624

0,001

8. Maladaptive perfectionism

62,52

19,32

62,97

13,46

59,59

12,67

5,65

0,059

Adaptive Perfectionism: Kazakh students demonstrated higher levels of adaptive perfectionism, particularly in ‘personal standards’ (N = 67,638, p < 0,001) and ‘organization’ (N = 20,248, p < 0,001). By pairwise comparison using U Mann-Whitney test these indicators were significantly higher than those observed among Chinese (p < 0,05) and Russian (p < 0,001) students. Chinese students also scored higher than Russian students (p < 0,001).

Parental criticism’ indicator (Н=22,743, p ≤ 0,001) was significantly more pronounced among Chinese students (М = 10,77±4,09). Pairwise comparison shows more pronounced level among Chinese students in comparison with Kazakh (p ≤ ,001) and Russian students (p ≤ 0,01), but no difference between Kazakh and Russian students has been identified. Therefore, it can be concluded that the factor of socio-cultural and family traditions has a greater impact on the indicators of destructive perfectionism of students from China and Kazakhstan than from Russia.

The data on adaptive perfectionism indicate a higher level among Kazakhstani students in terms of ‘personal standards’ (N = 67,638, p < 0,001), and ‘organization’ (N = 20,248, p < 0,001). A pairwise comparison using the Mann-Whitney U-test has revealed confirmation of these data, the value of adaptive perfectionism in Kazakh students is higher than in Chinese (p < 0.05) and Russian (p < 0.001) ones. Higher indicators in the Chinese sample compared with the Russian one (p < 0.001) have also been revealed.

The elevated adaptive perfectionism among Kazakh students may reflect greater goal awareness, possibly influenced by the requirement to work in their field after graduation, which accompanies university grants. For Chinese students, higher personal standards in comparison with Russian students may be attributed to intense societal competition in Chinese society.

To test the second hypothesis, a comparison was made of the perfectionism of students from China, Russia and Kazakhstan depending on gender (Table 3).

Table 3 presents the results of a comparative analysis of indicators of perfectionism among male students.

As it can be seen from Table 3, the data are similar to those obtained from the general sample. In a pairwise comparison using the Mann- Whitney U-test, the most pronounced differences were found in the indicators of ‘parental expectations’ (p < 0,001) and ‘parental criticism’ (p < 0,01) among Chinese male students in comparison with Russian ones.

Therefore, we can conclude that among male students, Chinese participants were most susceptible to social pressure, particularly parental criticism, reflecting traditional Chinese values emphasizing respect for authority, achievement and success (Li, 2001).

Adaptive perfectionism did not differ between Kazakh and Chinese male students but was higher in both groups compared to Russian males, primarily due to “personal standards” (p<0,001).

Overall, both adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism were higher among male students from Kazakhstan and China than among their Russian counterparts.

Table 3 Results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism among male students from China, Kazakhstan and Russia

Parameters

China

(N = 136)

Kazakhstan

(N = 120)

Russia

(N = 89)

Kruskal—Wallis

p

M

σ

M

σ

M

σ

1. Concern over Mistakes

24,88

9,49

24,69

6,27

24,25

6,91

0,984

0,612

2.Doubts about actions

12,49

3,49

12,27

2,95

12,05

3,06

1,152

0,562

3. Parental Expectations

16,04

4,67

16,15

4,07

13,67

3,00

28,868

0,001

4.Parental criticism

11,07

4,14

9,44

3,49

9,58

3,12

14,577

0,001

5.Personal Standards

23,44

5,31

24,13

4,69

21,11

4,68

23,232

0,001

6. Organization

23,60

4,34

23,72

3,92

23,36

4,80

0,751

0,687

7. Adaptive perfectionism

47,04

8,21

47,84

7,69

44,47

8,12

9,843

0,007

8. Maladaptive perfectionism

64,47

19,25

62,55

13,48

59,55

12,42

6,334

0,042

Table 4. Results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism among female student from China, Kazakhstan and Russia

Parameters

China

(N = 113)

Kazakhstan

(N = 178)

Russia

(N = 101)

Kruskal—Wallis

p

M

σ

M

σ

M

σ

1. Concern over Mistakes

23,05

8,99

25,43

6,71

24,62

6,50

6,058

0,048

2.Doubts about actions

12,36

3,80

12,53

3,09

12,86

2,68

1,437

0,488

3.Parental Expectations

14,34

4,61

16,19

4,14

12,61

3,48

50,205

0,001

4.Parental criticism

10,42

4,01

9,10

3,57

9,53

3,29

8,274

0,016

5. Personal Standards

21,70

4,90

23,20

4,14

18,82

5,03

51,215

0,001

6. Organization

22,01

4,77

23,76

3,47

21,00

4,09

33,862

0,001

7. Adaptive perfectionism

43,71

8,31

46,97

6,27

39,82

7,94

57,08

0,001

8. Maladaptive perfectionism

60,17

19,23

63,25

13,49

59,62

12,95

4,274

0,118

 

Table 5. Results of a comparative analysis of Chinese students’ perfectionism depending on gender

Parameters

Men,

China

(N = 136)

Women,

China

 (N = 113)

U Mann-Whitney

p

M

σ

M

σ

1.Concern over Mistakes

24,88

9,49

23,05

8,99

6696

0,080

2. Doubts about actions

12,49

3,49

12,36

3,80

7627,5

0,920

3.Parental Expectations

16,04

4,67

14,34

4,61

5917

0,002

4.Parental criticism

11,07

4,14

10,42

4,01

6943,5

0,189

5.Personal Standards

23,44

5,31

21,70

4,90

6065

0,004

6.Organization

23,60

4,34

22,01

4,77

6260,5

0,012

7.Adaptive perfectionism

47,04

8,21

43,71

8,31

6097,5

0,005

8.Maladaptive perfectionism

64,47

19,25

60,17

19,23

6654

0,069

 

Table 6. Results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism of Kazakhstani students depending on gender

Parameters

Men,

Kazakhstan

(N = 120)

Women,

Kazakhstan

(N = 178)

U Mann—Whitney

p

M

σ

M

σ

1.Concern over Mistakes

24,69

6,27

25,43

6,71

10017,5

0,363

2. Doubts about actions

12,27

2,95

12,53

3,09

10188,5

0,498

3. Parental Expectations

16,15

4,07

16,19

4,14

10577

0,887

4. Parental criticism

9,44

3,49

9,10

3,57

10000

0,349

5. Personal Standards

24,13

4,69

23,20

4,14

9438

0,088

6. Organization

23,72

3,92

23,76

3,47

10575,5

0,886

7. Adaptive perfectionism

47,84

7,69

46,97

6,27

9901,5

0,285

8.  Maladaptive perfectionism

62,55

13,48

63,25

13,49

10224

0,532

 

Таблица 7 / Table 7

Результаты сравнительного анализа перфекционизма российских студентов в зависимости от пола

Results of a comparative analysis of Russia students’ perfectionism depending on gender

Parameters

Men, Russia

(N = 89)

Women,

Russia

(N = 101)

U Mann—Whitney

p

M

σ

M

σ

1. Concern over Mistakes

24,25

6,91

24,62

6,50

4308

0,621

2. Doubts about actions

12,05

3,06

12,86

2,68

3623

0,020

3. Parental Expectations

13,67

3,00

12,61

3,48

3451

0,006

4. Parental criticism

9,58

3,12

9,53

3,29

4470

0,948

5. Personal Standards

21,11

4,68

18,82

5,03

3307

0,002

6.Organization

23,36

4,80

21,00

4,09

3316

0,002

7. Adaptive perfectionism

44,47

8,12

39,82

7,94

2979

0,001

8.Maladaptive perfectionism

59,55

12,42

59,62

12,95

4453,5

0,914

So, we can conclude that male Chinese students have higher perfectionism compared to women, and they have a greater tendency to perceive parents as people delegating very high expectations. 

Table 6 presents the results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism indicators of male and female students from Kazakhstan.

According to Table 6, there are no statistically significant differences in indicators of perfectionism between Kazakhstani male and female students.

Table 7 presents the results of a comparative analysis of perfectionism indicators among Russian students, depending on gender.

According to the Table 7, significant differences are observed in the indicator ‘doubts about the course of action’ (U=3623, p≤0,05), which is higher among Russian female students (M=12,86±2,68), the indicator ‘parental expectations’ (U=3451, p≤0,01) is significantly higher among male students. Consequently, we can state that in the Russian culture, destructive perfectionism in men is enhanced by an external factor, due to meeting the expectations of others, while in women it is due to an internal one, related to self-assessment of their activities.

According to the indicators ‘personal standards’ (U=3307, p≤0,01), ‘organization’ (U=3316, p≤0,01) and ‘adaptive perfectionism’ (U=2979.5, p≤0,001), the data are significantly higher among Russian male students compared to women.

Discussion

Perfectionism continues to draw significant scholarly interest due to the growing prevalence of socially prescribed perfectionism among students, which is increasingly linked to adverse psychological outcomes. In our cross-cultural study, we identified meaningful differences in maladaptive perfectionism across student samples from China, Kazakhstan, and Russia.

These findings align with the cultural-historical perspective, which posits that personality development is shaped by internalized four universities across three countries. While the findings offer valuable insights, they may not be fully generalizable to broader student populations. Future research should expand the sample to include a more diverse range of institutions and regions, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of how cultural norms shape perfectionistic orientations. Longitudinal designs and qualitative methods may further enrich our understanding of the developmental trajectories and lived experiences of perfectionism in different cultural contexts.

References

  1. Бапаева, С., Арганчиева, Д.Б. (2022). Исследование взаимосвязи эмоционального интеллекта и перфекционизма в условиях пост-карантинного периода во время пандемии Covid-19 у женщин г. Алматы. В: Психолого-педагогические проблемы образования в условиях инновационного развития: Материалы XI Международной научно-практической конференции (c. 90—95). Алматы: Университет «Туран», URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 4373574 (дата обращения: 02.11.2024).
    Bapaeva, S., Arganchiyeva, D. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Perfectionism in the Post-Quarantine Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Almaty Women. In: Psychological and pedagogical problems of education in the context of innovative development: Materials XI International Scientific-Practical Conference (pp. 90—95). Almaty: "Turan" University. (In Russ.) URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 4373574 (viewed: 02.11.2024).
  2. Выготский, Л.С. (1984). Проблемы детской (возрастной) психологии. Том 4. М.: Педагогика.
    Vygotsky, L.S. (1984). Problems of children psychology. Vol. 4. Moscow: Pedagogy. (In Russ.).
  3. Выготский, Л.С. (1960). Развитие высших психических функций: Из неопубликованных трудов. М.: Изд-во АПН, 500 с.
    Vygotsky, L.S. (1960). Development of higher mental functions: From unpublished works. Moscow: APN Publ. (In Russ.).
  4. Гавриченко, О.В., Бубновская, Е.А. (2021). Перфекционизм и тревожность как феномен самоотношения в молодом и зрелом возрасте. Вестник РГГУ. Серия «Психология. Педагогика. Образование», 4, 65—81. https://doi.org/28995/2073-6398-2021-4-65-81
    Gavrichenko, O.V. Bubnovskaya, E.A. (2021). Perfectionism and anxiety as a phenomenon of self-attitude in young and mature age. RGGU Bulletin. Psychology. Pedagogy. Education, 4, 65—81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2021-4-65-81
  5. Золотарева, А.А. (2018). Краткий дифференциальный тест перфекционизма: проверка кросс-культурной устойчивости факторной структуры и психометрических характеристик. Культурно-историческая психология, 14(1), 107—115. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140112.
    Zolotareva, A.A. (2018). Brief Differential Perfectionism Inventory: Checking Cross-Cultural Stability of the Factor Structure and Psychometric Characteristics. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(1), 107—115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140112
  6. Михайлова,О.Б., Фаренникова, Е.С. (2022). Выгорание и перфекционизм у студентов: кросс-культурные характеристики. Психология образования в поликультурном пространстве, 4(60), 22— 30.
    Mikhailova, O.B, Farennikova ,E. S. Burnout and perfectionism in students: cross-cultural characteristics. Psychology of education in a multicultural space, 4(60), 22—30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24888/2073 -843 9-2022-60-4-22-30
  7. Панина, В.В. (2020). Перфекционизм как устойчивая черта личности современных студентов В: Р.И. Анисимов (Ред.). Социологический нарратив 2020. Общество в эпоху турбулентности: поиски, угрозы и перспективы. Сборник статей по материалам XIX Всероссийской научной конференции студентов и аспирантов (c. 270—275). М.: РГГУ.
    Panina, V.V. (2020). Perfectionism as a stable personality trait of modern students. In : R.I. Anisimov (Ed.), Sociological Narrative 2020. Society in the era of turbulence: searches, threats and prospects. Collection of articles on the materials of the XIX All-Russian scientific conference of students and graduate students (pp. 270—275). Moscow: RGGU. (In Russ.).
  8. Пермякова, М.Е., Тюкалова, Н.В., Пермяков, М.Н. (2024). Связь счастья и психологического благополучия с перфекционизмом. Известия Уральского федерального университета. Сер. 1: Проблемы образования, науки и культуры, 30, 1, 203—214.
    Permyakova, M.E., Tyukalova, N.V., Permyakov, M.N. (2024). Relation of happiness and psychological well-being with perfectionism. Izvestia Ural Federal University. Ser. 1: Problems of Education, Science and Culture, 30(1), 203—214. (In Russ.).
  9. Пермякова, Т.М., Шевелева, М.С. (2015). Систематизация отечественных исследований и кросс-культурные перспективы изучения перфекционизма. Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология, 2(22), 65—73.
    Permyakova, T.M., Sheveleva, M.S. (2015). Systematization of domestic studies and cross-cultural perspectives of perfectionism study. Vestnik of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 2(22), 65—73. (In Russ.).
  10. Рубцов, В.В., Зарецкий В.К., Майданский А.Д. (2024). Сто лет развития культурно-исторической психологии: вехи и направления. Культурно-историческая психология, 20(3), 5—11. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2024200301
    Rubtsov, V.V., Zaretsky V.K., Maidansky A.D. (2024). 100 Years of the Development of Cultural-Historical Psychology: Milestones and Directions. Cultural-Historical Psychology, Vol. 20(3), 5—11. ( In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2024200301
  11. Русина, С.А. (2024). Перфекционизм студентов с разным уровнем психологического благополучия. Вестник Алтайского государственного педагогического университета, 2 (59), 72—78. https://doi.org/386/2413-4481-2024-2-72-78
    Rusina, S.A. Perfectionism in students with different levels of psychological well-being. Bulletin of Altai State Pedagogical University, 2(59), 72—78. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/386/2413-4481-2024-2-72-78
  12. Сиах, П.Ч., Анг, С.С., Тан, К.В., Пхи, Ч.Х., Пунг, П.В. (2022). Перфекционизм и академическая адаптация среди студентов: копинг-стратегии как посредник. Психологическая наука и образование, 27(5), 57—68. https://doi.org/10 17759/pse 2022270505
    Siah, P.Ch., Ang, S.S., Tan, K.W., Phi, Ch.Ni., Pung, P.W. (2022). Perfectionism and academic adjustment among undergraduates: the coping strategy as a mediator. Psychological Science and Education, 27, 57—68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10 17759/pse 2022270505
  13. Степанова, С.А., Смирнова, О.Е., Блажевич, Л.Е. (2023).Перфекционизм и трудоголизм студентов Петрозаводского государственного университета как факторы возникновения синдрома эмоционального выгорания. Тенденции развития науки и образования, 97(3), 106—108. https://doi.org/10.18411/trnio-05-2023-150
    Stepanova, S.A., Smirnova, O.E., Blazevich, L.E. (2023). Perfectionism and workaholism of students of Petrozavodsk State University as factors of emotional burnout syndrome occurrence. Trends in the development of science and education, 97(3), 106—108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18411/trnio-05-2023-150
  14. Тарасова, Л.Е. (2021). Перфекционизм в контексте субъективного благополучия личности. Ученые записки университета имени П.Ф. Лесгафта, 4 (194), 520—525. https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2021.4.
    Tarasova, L.E. (2021). Perfectionism in the context of subjective well-being of personality. Scientific Notes of P.F. Lesgaft University, 4(194), 520—525. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/ 10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2021.4.
  15. Фам, К.В., Дуонг, Н.Т., Фам, Тхи, Т.Д. (2023). Исследование перфекционизма и субъективного благополучия среди студентов колледжа: стратегии преодоления стресса как посредника. Образование и наука, 25(4), 196—210. https://doi.org/ 10.17853/1994-5639-2023-4-196-210 Pham, K.V., Duong, N.T., Pham, Thi T.D. (2023). Investigating perfectionism and subject wellbeing among college students: Stress coping strategies as a mediator. The Education and Science Journal, 25(4), 196—210. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-4-196-210
  16. Холмогорова, А.Б. (2016). Значение культурно-исторической теории развития психики Л.С. Выготского для разработки современных моделей социального познания и методов психотерапии. Культурно-историческая психология, 12(3). 58—92. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120305
    Kholomogorova, A.B. (2016). Significance of Cultural-Historical Theory of Psychological Development of L.S. Vygotsky for the Development of Modern Models of Social Cognition and Psychotherapy, Cultural-historical psychology, 12(3), 58—92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/0.17759/chp.2016120305
  17. Холмогорова, А.Б., Гаранян, Н.Г., Цацулин, Т.О. (2019). Динамика показателей перфекционизма и симптомов эмоционального неблагополучия в российской студенческой популяции за последние десять лет: когортное исследование. Культурно-историческая психология, 15(3), 41—50. 10.17759/chp. 2019150305
    Kholmogorova, A.B., Garanyan, N.G., Tsatsulin, T.O. (2019). Dynamics of perfectionism indicators and symptoms of emotional ill-being in the Russian student population over the last ten years: a cohort study. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15(3), 41—50. DOI: 10.17759/chp. 2019150305. (In Russ.).
  18. Южакова, И.О., Желонкина, Ю.Н., Басалаева, Н.В. (2017). Перфекционизм как психологическое явление. Международный научный журнал «Инновационная наука», 12(2), 027—030.
    Yuzhakova, I.O., Zhelonkina, Y.N., Basalaeva, N.V. (2017). Perfectionism as a psychological phenomenon. International scientific journal "Innovative Science", 12(2), 027—030. (In Russ.).
  19. Camp, E.E., Sheveleva, M.S., Permyakova, T.M., Wang, K.T. (2022). Family Perfectionism among Russian College Students. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 15(3), 38—55. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0303
  20. Chan, D.W. (2012). Life satisfaction, happiness, and the growth mindset of healthy and unhealthy perfectionists among Hong Kong Chinese gifted students. Roeper Review, 34(4), 224— https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02783193.2012.715333.
  21. Cox, B.J., Enns, M.W., Clara, I.P. (2002). The multidimensional structure of perfectionism in clinically distressed and college student samples. Psychological assessment, 14(3), 365—373.
  22. Egan, S.J., Johnson, C., Wade, T.D., Carlbring, P., Raghav, S., & Shafran, R. (2024). A pilot study of the perceptions and acceptability of guidance using artificial intelligence in internet cognitive behaviour therapy for perfectionism in young people. Internet interventions, 35, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2024.100711
  23. Flett, G.L., Hewitt, P.L., Blankstein, K.R., Gray, L. (1998). Psychological distress and the frequency of perfectionistic thinking. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(5), 1363—1381. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1363
  24. Frost, R.O., Heimberg, R.G., Holt, C.S., Mattia, J.I., Neubauer, A.L. (1993). A comparison of two measures of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 119—126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90181-2
  25. Haddadi, S., Tamannaeifar, M. (2022). Relationship between maladjustive perfectionism and academic Performance: Mediating role of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation. Razavi International Journal of Medicine, 10(2), 28—35. https://doi.org/ 30483/rijm.2021.254185.1037
  26. Li, J. (2001). Expectations of Chinese immigrant parents for their children’s education: The interplay of Chinese tradition and the Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Education, 26. 477—494. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602178.
  27. Liu, X., Zhang, S., Zheng, R., Yang, L., Cheng, C., You, J. (2024). Maladaptive perfectionism, daily hassles, and depressive symptoms among first-year college students in China. Journal of American college health, 72(4), 1094—1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2068014
  28. Lv, S., Chen, Z., Mao, J., Wang, H., Wu, P. et al. (2024). The Relationship between Self-Esteem and Social Phobia among College Students: The Mediating Effect of Fear of Negative Evaluation and the Moderating Effect of Perfectionism. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 26(6), 491—498. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2024.048917
  29. Padoa, A., Pellegrini M., Iafrate R. (2018). Perfectionism in parenting and social media use: a study on Italian mothers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(9), 2844—52.
  30. Shu, J. (2023). EFL learners’ problematic use of social media usage, classroom anxiety, perfectionism, and language attainment: correlations and perceptions. BMC Psychology, 11(443). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01419-5.
  31. Stöber, J. (1998). The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale revisited: More perfect with four (instead of six) dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(4), 481— https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00207-9.
  32. Tian, L., Hou, Z. (2024). Perfectionism, Psychological Distress, and Career Indecision Among Chinese College Students: The Mediation Effect of Coping. International Perspectives in Psychology. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000092. (viewed: 15.01.2024).
  33. Wu, R., Chen, J., Li, Q., Zhou, H. (2022) Reducing the influence of perfectionism and statistics anxiety on college student performance in statistics courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1011278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011278
  34. Xu, W. (2023). Research on the correlation between fear of negative evaluation and perfectionism among college students. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/26/20230889
  35.  

Information About the Authors

Bizhan S. Sheraly, Doctoral student, Chair of General and Applied Psychology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3291-4324, e-mail: sheralybizhan07@gmail.com

Tao Zhong, PhD, lecturer, Henan Normal University, China, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1021-5577, e-mail: zhong_research@hotmail.com

Liudmila N. Rogaleva, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of Physical Culture, Institute of Physical Culture, Sports and Youth Policy, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6870-9409, e-mail: liudmila.rogaleva@yandex.ru

Alla M. Kim, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Chair of General and Applied Psychology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8813-5417, e-mail: allakim2013@gmail.com

Nurlan A. Aldabergenov, director of the Graduate School of Business, Faculty of Business Administration, Turan University, Almaty, Kazakhstan, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0911-5632, e-mail: nurzhol-84@mail.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 306
Previous month: 78
Current month: 14

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 98
Previous month: 22
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 404
Previous month: 100
Current month: 14