Practice-oriented science based on cultural-historical psychology: history and prospects

Context and relevance. Education systems around the world are facing the challenges of global changes in technology, the labor market, and demography. Strengthening the interaction between science and practice in education is considered one of the conditions for a successful response to these challenges. In the USSR and post-Soviet Russia, precedents have been created for building productive cooperation between scientists and practitioners in education based on cultural and historical psychology, which are relevant in the current situation inside and outside the country. Objective. The article examines the genesis and content of the idea of a practice-oriented science of education in the context of modern discussions about barriers, opportunities and promising models of interaction between researchers and practitioners. Hypothesis. The «practice-oriented science» approach can help in responding to the current challenges of transforming education systems in Russia and the world. Methods and materials. Two groups of publications are analyzed: 1) reflecting modern discussions about the gap between science and practice in education and ways to overcome it, the search for effective forms and mechanisms of cooperation between researchers and practitioners; 2) characterizing the history of the conception and implementation of practice-oriented science in education in the USSR (Russian Federation). Results. The foundations and key characteristics of the practice-oriented science of education in Russia are presented. The connection of its development with the processes of development of psychological and pedagogical science and general education in the USSR (Russian Federation) is shown. Conclusions. The «practice-oriented science» approach has prospects for implementation in Russia and the world to meet the challenges of transforming education systems, but it needs to be developed taking into account the experience of developing and implementing other models of partnership between researchers and practitioners, current discussions and the socio-political context.

1. Громыко, Ю.В. (1996). Проектирование и программирование развития образования. Москва : МАРО, 546 с.
   Gromyko, Y.V. (1996). Designing and programming education development. Moscow: MARO, 546 p.
2. Громыко, Ю.В. (1998). Построение общественной практики средствами образования // Вопросы психологии, № 5, с. 37–48.
   Gromyko, Y.V. (1998). Building social practice by means of education // Voprosy Psikhologii, No. 5, 37-48.
3. Громыко, Ю.В., Давыдов, В.В. (2011). Образование как средство формирования и выращивания общественно-регионального развития // Образовательная политика, № 2 (52), 24-38. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovanie-kak-sredstvo-formirovaniya-i-vyraschivaniya-obschestvenno-regionalnogo-razvitiya (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
   Gromyko, Y.V., & Davydov, V.V. (2011). Education as a means of formation and cultivation of socio-regional development // Educational Policy, No. 2 (52), 24-38. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovanie-kak-sredstvo-formirovaniya-i-vyraschivaniya-obschestvenno-regionalnogo-razvitiya (viewed: 15.06.2025).
4. Громыко, Ю.В., Рубцов, В.В., Марголис, А.А. (2020). Школа как экосистема развивающихся детско-взрослых сообществ: деятельностный подход к проектированию школы будущего // Культурно-историческая психология, 16(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160106
   Gromyko, Y.V., Rubtsov, V.V., & Margolis, A.A. (2020). School as an ecosystem of developing child-adult communities: An activity approach to designing the school of the future // Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(1), 57–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160106
5. Давыдов, В.В. (1996). Теория развивающего обучения. Москва.
   Davydov, V.V. (1996). Theory of developmental learning. Moscow.
6. Из истории развивающего обучения // URL: https://author-club.org/news/110/ (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
   From the history of developmental learning // (In Russ.). URL: https://author-club.org/news/110/ (viewed: 15.06.2025).
7. Исаев, Е.И. (1997). Проблемы проектирования психологического образования педагога // Вопросы психологии, № 6, с. 48–56. URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1997/976/976048.htm (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
   Isaev, E.I. (1997). Problems of designing psychological education for teachers // Voprosy Psikhologii, No. 6, 48-56. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1997/976/976048.htm (viewed: 15.06.2025).
8. Косарецкий, С.Г. (2023). Использование культурно-исторической теории для анализа образовательного неравенства: потенциал, барьеры, перспективы // Культурно-историческая психология, 19(3), с. 47–55. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2023190306
   Kosaretsky, S.G. (2023). Using cultural-historical theory to analyze educational inequality: Potential, barriers, prospects // Cultural-Historical Psychology, 19(3), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2023190306
9. Медведев, А.М., Жуланова, И.В., Марокова, М.В. (2010). Генетико-моделирующий метод в исследовании психического развития. Волгоград, 186 с.
   Medvedev, A.M., Zhulanova, I.V., & Marokova, M.V. (2010). Genetic-modelling method in the study of mental development. Volgograd, 186 p.
10. Обухова, Л.Ф. (ред.) (2022). Основы общей (генетической) психологии. Теория П.Я. Гальперина и формирующий эксперимент : монография : научное наследие. Москва : ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, 292 с. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/bggp2022 (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
    Obukhova, L.F. (Ed.) (2022). Fundamentals of general (genetic) psychology. Theory of P.Ya. Galperin and formative experiment: Monograph: Scientific heritage. Moscow: MGPPU, 292 p. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/bggp2022 (viewed: 15.06.2025).
11. Репкина, Н.В. (1997). Система развивающего обучения в школьной практике // Вопросы психологии, № 3, с. 40–51. URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1997/973/973040.htm (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
    Repkina, N.V. (1997). System of developmental learning in school practice // Voprosy Psikhologii, No. 3, 40-51. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1997/973/973040.htm (viewed: 15.06.2025).
12. Рубцов, В.В. (1994). «Какая наука нужна сегодня московскому образованию?» Интервью // Журнал Россия-2010. URL: https://psychlib.ru/mgppu/ROs-1996/ROS-3371.htm#$p337 (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
    Rubtsov, V.V. (1994). What science does Moscow education need today? Interview // Journal Rossiya-2010. (In Russ.). URL: https://psychlib.ru/mgppu/ROs-1996/ROS-3371.htm#$p337 (viewed: 15.06.2025).
13. Рубцов, В.В., Ивошина, Т.Г. (2002). Проектирование развивающей образовательной среды школы. Москва : Изд-во МГППУ, 272 с.
    Rubtsov, V.V., & Ivochina, T.G. (2002). Designing a developing educational environment of the school. Moscow: MGPPU Publishing, 272 p.
14. Слободчиков, В.И. (2003). Очерки психологии образования. Биробиджан.
    Slobodchikov, V.I. (2003). Essays on psychology of education. Birobidzhan.
15. Слободчиков, В.И. (2008). Инновационное образование: введение в проблему // Муниципальное образование: инновации и эксперимент, № 6, 12-15. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/innovatsionoe-obrazovanie-vvedenie-v-problemu (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
    Slobodchikov, V.I. (2008). Innovative education: Introduction to the problem // Municipal Education: Innovations and Experiment, No. 6, 12-15. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/innovatsionoe-obrazovanie-vvedenie-v-problemu (viewed: 15.06.2025).
16. Сорокова, М.Г., Ульянина, О.А., Семья, Г.В., Леонова, О.И., Лубовский, Д.В., Исаев, Е.И., Подушкина, Т.Г., Бусыгина, Н.П., Радчикова, Н.П., Шведовская, А.А., Марголис, А.А., Сорокова, М.Г., Семья, Г.В. (2024). Доказательный подход: Руководство по верификации программ, технологий, практик в образовании и социальной сфере: учебное пособие. Москва: ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/evbaguver2024 (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
    Sorokova, M.G., Ulyanina, O.A., Semya, G.V., Leonova, O.I., Lubovsky, D.V., Isaev, E.I., Podushkina, T.G., Busygina, N.P., Radchikova, N.P., Shvedovskaya, A.A., Margolis, A.A., Sorokova, M.G., & Semya, G.V. (2024). Evidence-based approach: Guidelines for verification of programs, technologies, and practices in education and social sphere: Textbook. Moscow: MGPPU. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/evbaguver2024 (viewed: 15.06.2025).
17. Ansley, F., & Gaventa, J. (1997). Researching for democracy & democratizing research // Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389709603114
18. Asea, W.B. (2022). Epistemic decoloniality of westernised higher education: A discourse on curriculum justice and knowledge integration at historically white universities in South Africa // Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222221104343
19. Barbosa Gouveia, A., Mendonça Lunardi Mendes, G., Ebersöhn, L., Alexandre dos Santos Ferraz, M., Kosaretsky, S. (2024). Educação e formas de participação no contexto dos BRICS: alguns elementos para uma aproximação ao tema // Journal of Educational Policies, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/jpe.v18i1.97948
20. Biesta, G. (2006). Why “what works” won't work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Paper accepted for publication (January 2006) for Educational Theory. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
21. Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127
22. Bowers, Amanda Marie. (2017). University-community partnership models: Employing organizational management theories of paradox and strategic contradiction // Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(2), 37–64.
23. Broekkamp, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire // Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127
24. Coburn, C.E., Penuel, W.R., & Farrell, C.C. (2021). Fostering educational improvement with research-practice partnerships // Phi Delta Kappan, 102(7), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211007332
25. Coburn, C.E., & Penuel, W.R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions // Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
26. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
27. Cooper, A., Shewchuk, S. (2020). A developmental evaluation of research-practice-partnerships and their impacts // International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n9a967
28. Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? // British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121. URL: https://education.cuso.ch/fileadmin/education/Davies-1999-What-is-evidence-based-education_01.pdf (дата обращения: 15.06.2025).
29. Donovan, M.S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems // Science, 340(6130), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236180
30. Ebersöhn, L., et al. (2015). Taking note of obstacles research partners negotiate in long-term higher education community engagement partnerships // Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.003
31. Elfert, M., & Ydesen, C. (2024). Global governance and the promissory visions of education: challenges and agendas // Comparative Education, 60(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.2371701
32. Farley-Ripple, E., et al. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework // Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
33. Galletta, A., & Torre, M. E. (2019). Participatory action research in education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.557
34. Gillett-Swan, J., & Baroutsis, A. (2023). Student voice and teacher voice in educational research: a systematic review of 25 years of literature from 1995–2020. Oxford Review of Education, 50(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2257132
35. Gorard, S. (2020). Getting evidence into education: Evaluating the routes to policy and practice. Routledge.
36. Grosfoguel, R. (2002). Colonial difference, gepolitics of knowledge, and global coloniality in the modern/colonial capitalist world-system // Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 25(3), 203–224.
37. Hadar, L.L., & Baharav, H. (Eds.) (2025). Practice Partnerships in Education: Practitioner-Researcher Collaboration in the Israeli Context. Taylor & Francis.
38. Hallonsten, O. (2021). Stop evaluating science: A historical-sociological argument // Social Science Information, 60(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018421992204
39. Hammersley, M. (2005). The myth of research‐based practice: The critical case of educational inquiry // International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455704200032844
40. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature // Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498032000153025
41. Kamga, R., Allaire, S., Baron, M.P., Cody, N., Coulombe, S., Dumoulin, C., … Thériault, P. (2023). The emergence of research-practice partnerships in education: A literature review // Phronesis, 12(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/ 10.7202/1095154ar
42. Kersha, Y., et al. (2025). Evaluating 30 years of experimental education research in the post-Soviet space: A meta-analysis of studies on student achievement // International Journal of Educational Development, 115, Article 103274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103274
43. Knobloch, P.D.T. (2020). Epistemological decolonization and education. International perspectives // Foro de Educación, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.797
44. Korthagen, F.A.J. (2007). The gap between research and practice revisited // Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640235
45. London, R.A., & Claassen, J. (2023). Playing for keeps: A long‐term community‐engaged research partnership to support safe and healthy elementary school recess // Sociological Forum, 38, 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12906
46. MacMahon, S., Leggett, J., & Carroll, A. (2022). Partnering to learn: A collaborative approach to research translation for educators and researchers // Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12317
47. Malin, J., & Brown, C. (Eds.) (2019). The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462436
48. Naidorf, J.C. (2014). Knowledge utility: From social relevance to knowledge mobilization // Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 89. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n89.2014
49. Owen, K.L., Watkins, R.C., & Hughes, J.C. (2022). From evidence‐informed to evidence‐based: An evidence building framework for education // Review of Education, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3342
50. Penfield, T., Baker, M.J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M.C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review // Research Evaluation, 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021
51. Penuel, W.R., Furtak, E.M., & Farrell, C. (2021). Practice partnerships in education: advancing an evolutionary logic of systems improvement // DDS–Die Deutsche Schule, 113(1), 45–62. DOI:10.31244/dds.2021.01.05
52. Penuel, W.R., & Gallagher, D. (2017). Creating research-practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.
53. Rycroft‐Smith, L. (2022). Knowledge brokering to bridge the research‐practice gap in education: Where are we now? // Review of Education, 10(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3341
54. Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2018). Cultural-historical activity theory: Founding insights and new challenges // Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(3), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140305
55. Schlicht-Schmälzle, R., et al. (2024). Bridging the research-practice gap in education: Initiatives from 3 OECD countries. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/c0d3f781-en
56. Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2023). Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships–a systematic literature review // Educational Review, 75(7), 1490–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103
57. Slavin, R.E. (2020). How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education // Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432
58. Supplee, L.H. (2023). Connecting reading research with educational practice and policy // Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12385
59. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
60. Welsh, R.O. (2021). Assessing the quality of education research through its relevance to practice: An integrative review of research-practice partnerships // Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3338
61. Wrigley, T. (2018). The power of ‘evidence’: Reliable science or a set of blunt tools? // British Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3338
62. Yliniva, K., Bryan, A., & Brunila, K. (2024). ‘The future we want’? – the ideal twenty-first century learner and education’s neuro-affective turn // Comparative Education, 60(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.2363096