Social Representations About School and Learning in Different Groups of Participants of the Educational Process

The article presents the results of an empirical study of social representations about school and learning among the main participants of the modern school educational process: students themselves, their teachers and parents.The study, conducted in the 2018/2019 academic year, involved 480 teenagers, pupils of 5—11 classes of several Moscow secondary schools, 145 of their parents (mostly mothers) and 147 teachers (of which also the majority are women).To identify social representations, respondents were asked to write five consecutive associations for the following words: "school" (for teenagers), "school of my childhood" and "modern school" (for teachers and parents), "learning" and "Unified state exam (USE)" (for all groups of participants).In the logic of the theory of "core and periphery" obtained for each of the groups of participants of the study associations were subjected to prototypical analysis (according to P.Verges).We tested the hypothesis on the difference in social representations about school and learning in different groups of participants of the educational process.Social representations were indeed different in the studied groups when it came to school and learning, but they turned out to be quite close when the associations to the word "Unified state exam (USE)" were analyzed: apart from the frequently occurring ascertaining (and in this sense emotionally neutral) association "test", the rest had a negative emotional, evaluative connotation.

1. Baranova V.A., Dontsov A.I.Collective memories and cultural trauma of different generational groups.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [ Social Psychology and Society], 2019.Vol.10, no.2, pp.29—46.doi:10.17759/sps.2019100204.(In Russ., аin Engl.)
2. Volovikova I.M., Mustafina L.Sh .Struktura sotsial’nykh predstavlenii rossiiskoi molodezhi [The structure of social representations of Russian youth].In Zhuravlev A.L.[i dr.] (eds.), Psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva [Psychological problems of modern Russian society].Moscow: Publ.“Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012.575 p.
3. Vorob’eva E.V., Gorokhov S.V.Shkola kak institut sotsializatsii [School as an institution of socialization].In Tolstykh N.N.(eds.), Sotsial’naya psikhologiya razvitiya: v 2 ch. Chast’ 1: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury [ Social developmental psychology: in 2 parts. Part 1: textbook for undergraduate and graduate courses].Moscow: Publ.“Yurait”, 2017, pp.148—168.
4. Dontsov A.I., Emel’yanova T.P.Kontseptsiya sotsial’nykh predstavlenii v sovremennoi frantsuzskoi psikhologii [The concept of social representations in modern French psychology].Moscow: Publ.MGU, 1987.128 p.
5. Emel’yanova T.P.Sotsial’nye predstavleniya: istoriya, teoriya i empiricheskie issledovaniya [Social notions: history, theory, and empirical research].Moscow: Publ.“Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.476 p.
6. Emel’yanova T.P.Razrabotka ponyatiya sotsial’nogo predstavleniya — novyi etap v razvitii kontseptual’nogo apparata sotsial’noi psikhologii [The development of the concept of social representation is a new stage in the development of the conceptual apparatus of social psychology].In Zhuravlev A.L.(reds.), Razrabotka ponyatii sovremennoi psikhologii [The development of concepts of modern psychology].Moscow: Publ.“Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2018, pp.379—400.
7. Emelyanova T.P., Drobysheva T.V.Collective feelings about significant social phenomena: Russian orthodox universities vs secular students’ groups comparative analysis [Electronic resource].Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya [ Psychological Studies], 2017.Vol.10, no.53.URL: http://psystudy.ru/ index.php/num/2017v10n53/1427-emelyanova53.html (Accessed: 06.11.2019).
8. Emelyanova T.P., Drobysheva T.V.Integrated research of collective feelings for social problems: quantitative and qualitative-quantitative methods.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2018.Vol. 9, no.3, pp.166—175.doi:10.17759/sps.2018090316.(In Russ., аin Engl.).
9. Kondratyev M.D.Social concepts about the success of teenagers with different intragroup status and different levels of intellectual success.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [ Social Psychology and Society], 2017.Vol. 8, no.2, pp.116—130.doi:10.17759/ sps.2017080208.(In Russ., аin Engl.).
10. Kuznetsova A.V.Collective Memories of Political Power in Various Historical Periods in Representatives of Different Social Groups of Russians.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [ Social Psychology and Society], 2013.Vol.4, no.3, pp.102—115.(In Russ., аin Engl.).
11. Timoshina I.N.The structure of students’ perception of social status in contemporary society.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [ Social Psychology and Society], 2016.Vol.7, no.2, pp.51—64.doi:10.17759/ sps.2016070204 (In Russ., аin Engl.)
12. Fedotova S.V.Struktura sotsial’nykh predstavlenii molodezhi o sotsial’nom statuse [The structure of social representations of youth on social status].Vestnik Rossiiskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya “Chelovek v sovremennom [Vestnik of Russian New University. Series “Man in the modern world”], 2015, no.4, pp. 37—45.
13. Abric J.-Cl.Experimental study of group creativity: Task representation, group structure and performance.European Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, no.1 (3), pp.311—326.
14. Moscovici S.Etude de representation social de la psychanalyse.These pour le Doctorates Lettres.Paris: PUF, 1960.
15. Moscovici S.The phenomenon of social representation.In Farr R.M.(eds.), Social representations.Cambridge: CUP, 1984, pp.3—69.
16. Verges P.Noyau central, sailanceet proprieties structurales.Textessur les representations sociales, 1994, no.3 (1), pp.3—12.

PlumX

article metrics