Relationship between Hardiness in Students and Their Parents’ Attitude to Them

1169

Abstract

The authors focus on the controversial situation of a large number of theoretical and practical works on psychological aspects of education, the high importance of hardiness for productive life of individuals in modern society and the absence of works exploring how parents influence the formation of hardiness in their children. The paper presents results of the study of the relationship between hardiness in young male and female students and the features of their subjective childhood image of family and current attitudes of their parents. The sample of the study was 119 students (43 males and 76 females).Methodological support of the research included the following: Hardiness test (Hardiness Survey by S. Muddi, adapted by D.A. Leontiev); two scales of the BIV questionnaire (Biographisches Inventar zur Diagnose von Verhaltenstörungen) revealing the nature of childhood image of family; the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics technique assessing the key aspects of relationships. The results of the study showed that the level of hardiness in the subjects is closely related to the nature of their childhood images of family: the more positive the image is, the higher the hardiness. The relationship between hardiness and the current attitude of parents has both common and gender-specific trends. Parental care and high interest in preserving the child’s attachment impede the manifestation of hardiness in the young people. The gender specifics of those aspects of parental attitude that promote hardiness does not coincide with the generally accepted patterns.

General Information

Keywords: hardiness, commitment, control, challenge, student age, parental family, family image, parental attitude

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250307

For citation: Alikin I.A., Alikin M.I., Lukyanchenko N.V. Relationship between Hardiness in Students and Their Parents’ Attitude to Them. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2020. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 75–89. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2020250307. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Aleksandrova A.A.K osmysleniyu ponyatiya «zhiznestoikost’ lichnosti» v kontekste problematiki psikhologii sposobnostei [To understanding the concept of “resilience of the personality” in the context of the problems of psychology of abilities].Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Psikhologiya sposobnostei. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanii» (Moskva, 25—26 sentyabrya 2015 g.) [Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Psychology of Abilities.Current Status and Research Prospects”].Moscow: IP RAN Publ, 2005, pp.16—21.(In Russ.).
  2. Alikin I.A., Luk’yanchenko N.V.Osobennosti roditel’skogo otnosheniya ottsov i materei k detyam raznykh vozrastov [Features of the parental relationship of fathers and mothers to children of different ages].Materialy Sed’moi Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Vozmozhnosti i riski tsifrovoi sredy» (Moskva, 12—13 dekabrya 2019 g.).[Materials of the Seventh All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Opportunities and Risks of the Digital Environment”].Vol.2.Moscow: MGPPU Publ., 2019, pp.233—237.(In Russ.).
  3. Belinskaya E.P.Identifikatsionnye modeli podrostkov i molodezhi: «geroi nashego vremeni» [Identification models of adolescents and youth: “heroes of our time”].Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological research, 2017.Vol.10, no.54.Available at: http:// psystudy.ru (Accessed: 10.03.2020).(In Russian, abstr.in English).
  4. Bronson P., Merrimen E.Mify vospitaniya.Nauka protiv intuitsii [Myths of education.Science versus intuition].Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2014.240 p.(In Russ.).
  5. Golubeva E.V., Istratova O.N.Opyt otnoshenii v roditel’skoi sem’e kak prediktor psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya molodykh [Relationship experience in a parental family as a predictor of the psychological well-being of young people].Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Azimuth of scientific research. Pedagogy and psychology. 2018.Vol.7, no. 2 (23), pp.358—362.(In Russ.).
  6. Gorkovaya I.A., Miklyaeva A.V.Zhiznestoikost’ i koping-strategii podrostkov s narusheniyami oporno-dvigatel’nogo apparata [Hardiness and Coping- Strategies of Adolescents with Motor Impairments].Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2019.Vol.8, no. 1, pp.90—102.DOI:10.17759/cpse.2019080106.(In Russ.).
  7. Grigoriev P.E., Vasilieva I.V.Svyaz’ ekzistentsial’nykh kharakteristik i zhiznestoikosti s psikhosomaticheskoi kardiosimptomatikoi u lits molodogo vozrasta [Relations of existential characteristics and hardiness with psychosomatic cardiac symptoms in young people].Byulleten’ sibirskoi meditsiny = Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2018.Vol.17.no.4.pp.33—41.(In Russ.) DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2018-4-33-41
  8. Demoz L.Psikhoistoriya: Per.s angl.[Psychohistory].Rostov-on-Don: «Feniks», 2000.512 p.(In Russ.).
  9. Ermolaeva M.V., Smirnova O.V.Osobennosti roditel’skogo obshcheniya kak faktor psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya podrostkov [Characteristics of Parental Communication as a Factor of Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2020.Vol.25, no.1, pp.51—62.DOI:10.17759/ pse.2020250105 (In Russ.).
  10. Kashapov A.S.Svyaz’ internal’nosti v semeinykh otnosheniyakh s tipami povedeniya v konflikte u predstavitelei raznykh professii [The relationship of internality in family relationships with types of behavior in conflict among representatives of different professions].In Sitnikov V.L.(ed.).Sem’ya i sovremennyi sotsium, seriya: sem’ya i deti v sovremennom mire [Family and modern society, a series: family and children in the modern world].Saint Petersburg: «Sotsial’no-gumanitarnoe znanie», 2017, pp.224—230.(In Russ.).
  11. Karabanova O.A.Detsko-roditel’skie otnosheniya i praktika vospitaniya v sem’e: kross-kul’turnyi aspekt [Child-parent relationship and the practice of education in the family: cross-cultural aspect].Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2017.Vol.6, no.2, pp.15—26.doi:10.17759/jmfp.2017060202 (In Russ.).
  12. Kolmakova L.A.Osobennosti mirovozzreniya, zhiznestoikosti i vyrazhennosti travmaticheskogo stressa u lits, perezhivshikh razlichnye po stepeni ekstremal’nosti situatsii [Peculiarities of the worldview, vitality and severity of traumatic stress in people who have experienced situations of varying degrees of extremeness].Trudy akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii = Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2009, no.4, pp. 82—86.(In Russ.).
  13. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I.Test zhiznestoikosti [Hardiness test].Moscow: Smysl, 2006.63 p.(In Russ.).
  14. Krichevec A.N., Solodushkina M.V.Muzhestvo byt’.Zhiznestoikost’ i vera [Courage to Be.Hardiness and Faith].Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2014.Vol. 22, no.5, pp.103—117.DOI:10.17759/ cpp.2014220505 (In Russ.).
  15. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I.Zhiznestoikost’ kak sostavlyayushchaya lichnostnogo potentsiala [Hardiness as a component of personal potential].In Leont’ev D.A.(ed.), Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: structure and diagnosis]. Moscow: Smysl, 2011, pp.178—209.(In Russ.).
  16. Loginova M.V.Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie zhiznestoikosti lichnosti studentov: Avtoref.dis.… kand.psikhol.nauk [The psychological content of the resilience of students.Ph.D.(Psychology) Thesis].Moscow, 2010.31 p.(In Russ.).
  17. Maddi S.Smysloobrazovanie v protsessakh prinyatiya resheniya [Meaning in decision making processes].Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2005.Vol.26, no.6, pp.87—101.(In Russ.).
  18. Operatsionalizirovannaya psikhodinamicheskaya diagnostika (OPD)-2.Rukovodstvo po diagnostike i planirovaniyu terapii: Per.s angl.[Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD)-2.Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment planning].Goncharov A.M.(ed.).Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2011.454 p.(In Russ.).
  19. Psikhologiya rannego studencheskogo vozrasta [Psychology of early student age].Berezhkovskaya E.L.(ed.).Moscow: Prospekt, 2014.192 p.(In Russ.).
  20. Fromm E.The Art of Loving: An Inquiry Into the Nature of Love.New York: Rinehart & Company, 1956.133 p.
  21. Handbook on Parent Education.Edited by Marvin J.Fine.New York: Academic press, 1980.341 p.
  22. Maddi S., Kobasa S. The Hardy Executive: Health under Stress.Homewood (IL): Dow Jones-Irwin, 1984.131 p.
  23. Maddi S.Dispositional Hardiness in Health and Effectiveness.Encyclopedia of Mental Health.H.S. Friedman (Ed.).San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1998, pp.323—335.
  24. Khoshaba D., Maddi S.Hardiness and Mental Health.Journal of Personality Assessment, 1994.Vol. 63, no 2, pp.265—274.

Information About the Authors

Igor A. Alikin, PhD in Biology, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of Primary Education, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-1512, e-mail: alikinia@mail.ru

Mark I. Alikin, Undergraduate, Institute of Social and Humanitarian Technologies, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-4454, e-mail: alikin-1995@mail.ru

Natalya V. Lukyanchenko, PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2813-9461, e-mail: Luk.nv@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1835
Previous month: 23
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 1169
Previous month: 15
Current month: 5