The relationship between the level of acceptance of schoolchildren in inclusive classes and their self-esteem

 
Audio is AI-generated
0

Abstract

Context and relevance. To implement inclusion, it is not enough to organize joint education of children with different educational needs. It is necessary to create conditions that ensure acceptance of everyone, participation, support and accessibility of education. Objective. To study, in the context of joint education of schoolchildren with different educational needs, the relationship between the level of their acceptance of each other in the class as a whole, and the indicators of the personal development of students – self-esteem and the level of aspirations in the class as a whole. Hypothesis. The hypothesis of the study is the assumption of the existence of a connection between the level of acceptance of schoolchildren among each other in the class as an indicator of class inclusiveness and the level of their self-esteem and aspirations in general across classes with a certain level of acceptance. Methods and materials. The study, which was conducted in 2024, involved 1713 students from 57 fourth grades and 1525 students from 52 eighth grades from 55 schools in six regions of Russia. The sample included 230 students with disabilities (7,1%) studying in joint classes with normotypical students. The level of student acceptance was studied using the Sociomonitoring Service software and methodological complex; the parameters of student self-esteem were measured using the Dembo–Rubinstein method as modified by A.M. Prikhozhan. Results. Data analysis revealed the presence of three types of classes with different levels of acceptance among fourth graders (high – 9%, insufficient – 77%, low – 14%) and among eighth graders (high – 13%, insufficient – 63%, low – 23%). In fourth and eighth grades with a higher level of acceptance, a smaller proportion of students with low self-esteem and low aspirations was observed. In classes with a high level of acceptance, low self-esteem was not observed among students with disabilities. There were statistically significant differences between classes of different types in terms of levels of self-esteem and aspirations. Conclusions. It has been shown that in classes with a high level of acceptance of each other by students, there is a higher level of self-esteem and aspirations, which favors their personal development, which demonstrates the significant role of acceptance in achieving an inclusive educational environment. It is recommended that schools pay more attention to ensuring an accepting environment in classrooms as one of the key conditions for inclusion.

General Information

Keywords: social relations, joint learning, inclusion, acceptance, self-esteem, personal development, sociomonitoring

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2025300604

Funding. Funding. The study was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated 09.02.2025 No. 073-00037-24-01 “Psychological assistance to students with special educational needs in an inclusive general education organization”.

Acknowledgements. The authors thank G.I. Tolchkov for assistance in collecting data for the study.

Received 29.04.2025

Revised 14.10.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Bystrova, Yu.A., Samsonova, E.V., Shemanov, A.Yu., Alekseeva, M.N. (2025). The relationship between the level of acceptance of schoolchildren in inclusive classes and their self-esteem. Psychological Science and Education, 30(6), 54–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2025300604

© Bystrova Yu.A., Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Yu., Alekseeva M.N., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Александров, Д.А., Иванюшина, В.А., Ходоренко, Д.К., Тенишева, К.А. (2018). Школьный климат: концепция и инструмент измерения. М.: Издательский Дом Высшей школы экономики. doi:10.17323/978-5-7598-1737-6
    Aleksandrov, D.A., Ivanyushina, V.A., Khodorenko, D.K., Tenisheva, K.A. (2018). School climate: concept and measurement tool. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.). doi:10.17323/978-5-7598-1737-6
  2. Бут, Т., Эйнскоу, М. (2007). Показатели инклюзии: Практическое пособие (М. Воган, ред., И. Аникеев, пер. с англ., Н. Борисова, науч. ред., М. Перфильева, общ. ред.). М.: РООИ «Перспектива».
    Booth, T., Einscow, M. (2007). Indicators of inclusion: Practical manual (M. Vaughan, ed., I. Anikeyev, trans. from English, N. Borisova, scientific ed., M. Perfil'eva, general ed.). Moscow: ROOI “Perspektivaˮ. (In Russ.).
  3. Быстрова, Ю.А. (2022). Развитие социальной компетентности у подростков с ОВЗ в условиях инклюзивного образования. Психологическая наука и образование, 27(6), 102–114. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270608
    Bystrova, Yu.A. (2022). Development of social competence in adolescents with disabilities in the context of inclusive education. Psychological Science and Education, 27(6), 102–114. (In Russ.). DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270608
  4. Волкова, Е.Н. (2021). Программы профилактики подросткового буллинга в деятельности педагога-психолога. Вестник практической психологии образования, 18(3), 90–97. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2021180308
    Volkova, E.N. (2021). Programs for the Prevention of Teenage Bullying in the Activities of an Educational Psychologist. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 18(3), 90–97. (In Russ.). DOI:10.17759/bppe.2021180308
  5. Замечание общего порядка № 4 (2016) о праве на инклюзивное образование. Комитет по правам инвалидов ООН. CRPD/C/GC/4. 2016. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/CRPD/C/GC/4 (дата обращения: 25.02.2025).
    General Comment No. 4 (2016) on the right to inclusive education. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. CRPD/C/GC/4. 2016. (In Russ.). URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/CRPD/C/GC/4 (viewed: 25.02.2025).
  6. Инденбаум, Е.Л. (2023). Личностные результаты образования младших школьников: проблемы оценки и формирования, способы диагностики и мониторинга. Вестник Томского государственного университета, 493, 192–201. https://doi.org/17223/15617793/493/21
    Indenbaum, E.L. (2023). Personal results of education of primary school students: problems of assessment and formation, methods of diagnostics and monitoring. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 493, 192–201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/493/21
  7. Луковенко, Т.Г., Митина, Г.В., Ильиных, Г.С. (2022). Условия социализации детей с ограниченными возможностями здоровья в специальном и инклюзивном образовании. Педагогика. Вопросы теории и практики. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 7(9), 886–894.
    Lukovenko, T.G., Mitina, G.V., Ilyinykh, G.S. (2022). Conditions of socialization of children with disabilities in special and inclusive education. Theory and Practice, 7(9), 886–894. (In Russ.).
  8. Лыскова, Г.Т. (2019). Психолого-педагогическая сущность и детерминанты социализации младших школьников в условиях инклюзивного класса. Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета, 3(221), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.25198/1814-6457-221-49
    Lyskova, G.T. (2019). Psychological and pedagogical essence and determinants of socialization of primary school students in an inclusive class. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 3(221), 49–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25198/1814-6457-221-49
  9. Оценка инклюзивной образовательной среды в образовательной организации: учебное пособие (2024). (С.В. Алёхина, Ю.А. Быстрова, ред.). М.: ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/aieeeo2024/contents (дата обращения: 26.02.2025).
    Assessment of the inclusive educational environment in an educational organization: a tutorial (2024). (S.V. Alekhina, Yu.A. Bystrova, eds.). Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/nonserialpublications/aieeeo2024/contents (viewed: 02/26/2025).
  10. Прихожан, А.М. (2007). Диагностика личностного развития детей подросткового возраста. М.: АНО «ПЭБ».
    Prikhozhan, A.M. (2007). Diagnostics of personal development of adolescents. Moscow: ANO “PEBˮ. (In Russ.).
  11. Ряписова, А.Г., Чепель, Т.Л. (2013). Исследование эффективности образовательного процесса в условиях инклюзивной практики. Сибирский педагогический журнал, 2, 226–232.
    Ryapisova, A.G., Chepel, T.L. (2013). Study of the effectiveness of the educational process in the context of inclusive practice. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2, 226–232. (In Russ.).
  12. Самсонова, Е.В., Быстрова, Ю.А. (2024). Условия формирования самооценки у подростков с ментальными особенностями в условиях специальной и инклюзивной школы. Инклюзия в образовании, 9, 2(34), 91–101.
    Samsonova, E.V., Bystrova, Yu.A. (2024). Conditions for the formation of self-esteem in adolescents with mental disabilities in a special and inclusive school. Inclusion in education, 9, 2(34), 91–101. (In Russ.).
  13. Самсонова, Е.В., Шеманов, А.Ю., Алехина, С.В., Быстрова, Ю.А. (2025). Разнообразие особых образовательных потребностей обучающихся в инклюзивной образовательной среде школ. Клиническая и специальная психология, 14(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2025140202
    Samsonova, E.V., Shemanov, A.Yu., Alekhina, S.V., Bystrova, Yu.A. (2025). Diver sity of special educational needs of learners in inclusive school environments. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 14(2), 21–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2025140202
  14. Фомина, Т.Г., Ефтимова, О.В., Моросанова, В.И. (2018). Взаимосвязь субъективного благополучия с регуляторными и личностными особенностями у учащихся младшего школьного возраста. Психолого-педагогические исследования, 10(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/17759/psyedu.2018100206
    Fomina, T.G., Eftimova, O.V., Morosanova, V.I. (2018). The relationship between subjective well-being and regulatory and personal characteristics in primary school students. Psychological and pedagogical studies, 10(2), 64–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2018100206
  15. Хабарова, О.Е. (2004). Программно-методический комплекс «Социомониторинг». В: О.Е. Хабарова, В.В. Лакин, И.Н. Котова [и др.]. Информационные модели активной антинаркотической пропаганды в молодежной субкультуре: методическое пособие. Часть I: Книга 2 (О.Е. Хабарова, сост.) (с. 1–77). Ярославль: ГОУ ЯО ИРО, Минобрнауки России.
    Khabarova, O.E. (2004). Software and methodological complex “Sociomonitoringˮ. In: O.E. Khabarova, V.V. Lakin, I.N. Kotova [et al.]. Information models of active anti-drug propaganda in youth subculture: a methodological manual. Part I: Book 2 (O.E. Khabarova, comp.) (pp. 1–77). Yaroslavl: State Educational Institution Yaroslavl Region Institute of Regional Studies, Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
  16. Шеманов, А.Ю., Екушевская, А.С. (2018). Формирование инклюзивной культуры при реализации инклюзивного образования: вызовы и достижения. Современная зарубежная психология, 1, 29–37. https://doi.org/17759/jmfp.2018070103
    Shemanov, A.Yu., Ekushevskaya, A.S. (2018). Formation of an inclusive culture in the implementation of inclusive education: challenges and achievements. Modern Foreign Psychology, 1, 29–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070103
  17. Щетинина, М.В., Шутенко, Е.Н. (2021). Самооценка младших школьников с разным социометрическим статусом. Тенденции развития науки и образования, 74-8, 59–61. https://doi.org/18411/lj-06-2021-308
    Shchetinina, M.V., Shutenko, E.N. (2021). Self-esteem of younger students with different sociometric status. Trends in the Development of Science and Education, 74-8, 59–61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-06-2021-308
  18. Юдина, Т.А. (2021). Возрастно-психологические особенности социальной ситуации развития младших школьников в условиях инклюзивного образования: Автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. М.
    Yudina, T.A. (2021). Age-psychological features of the social situation of development of younger students in the context of inclusive education: Extended abstr. of Psychol. Sci.: Moscow. (In Russ.).
  19. Юдина, Т.А., Алехина, С.В. (2021). Возрастная динамика социальной ситуации развития младших школьников в условиях инклюзивного образования. Культурно-историческая психология, 17(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/17759/chp.2021170317
    Yudina, T.A., Alekhina, S.V. (2021). Age dynamics of the social situation of development of primary school students in the context of inclusive education. Cultural-historical psychology, 17(3), 135–142. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170317
  20. Bozhani, E.F., Momeni, K., Moradi, A. (2025) The Relationship Between School Culture and Students' Academic Well‐Being Through the Mediating Role of the Satisfaction of the Basic Psychological Needs. Correlational Study Health Science Reports, 8: e70379. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70379
  21. Bruyn, E.H. de, Cillessen, A.H.N., Wissink, I.B. (2010). Associations of Peer Acceptance and Perceived Popularity With Bullying and Victimization in Early Adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(4), 543–566. https://doi.org/1177/0272431609340517
  22. Building Resilience through Inclusive Education Systems. Guidance for Establishing a Culture of Effective Communication in Education (2024). (M. Bilgeri, A. Lecheval (Eds.). European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. URL: https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/BRIES-guidance (дата обращения: 21.02.2025).
  23. Margas, N. (2023). Inclusive classroom climate development as the cornerstone of inclusive school building: review and perspectives. Psycho, 14, Article 1171204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1171204
  24. Touloupis, T. (2024). Facebook Use and Cyberbullying by Students with Learning Disabilities: The Role of Self-Esteem and Loneliness. Psychological Reports, 127(3), 1237–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221138471
  25. Williams, C.J., Chen, J.M., Quirion, A., Hoeft, F. (2024). Peer mentoring for students with learning disabilities: the importance of shared experience on students’ social and emotional development. Educ., 9, Article 1292717. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1292717

Information About the Authors

Yuliya A. Bystrova, Doctor of Psychology, Assistant Professor, Head of Scientific Laboratory of the Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Additional Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-0993, e-mail: bystrovayua@mgppu.ru

Elena V. Samsonova, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Leading Researcher of the Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Additional Education, head of the master's program "Tutor support in inclusive education", Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-1438, e-mail: samsonovaev@mgppu.ru

Alexey Y. Shemanov, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Special Psychology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Clinical and Special Psychology, Leading Researcher, Scientific Laboratory of the Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Additional Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-3534, e-mail: shemanovayu@mgppu.ru

Marina N. Alekseeva, Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Supplementary Education. Specialist in educational and methodological work, head of the monitoring sector, Moscow State University of psychology and education (MSUPE), Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-297X, e-mail: alekseevamn@mgppu.ru

Contribution of the authors

Bystrova Yu.A. — research planning; experiment implementation; data analysis; manuscript writing and design; research supervision.

Samsonova E.V. — research ideas; research planning; experiment implementation; data analysis; manuscript writing and design.

Shemanov A.Yu. — data analysis; annotation, application of statistical and mathematical methods for data analysis; manuscript writing and design.

Alekseeva M.N. — application of statistical and mathematical methods for data analysis; data collection and analysis; visualization of research results.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was conducted by educational psychologists at the schools which had obtained informed consent from parents to conduct psychological measurements on their children.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0