Features of decision-making by representatives of generations Y and Z in a digital environment

Context and relevance. The decision-making process among younger generations is becoming increasingly complex under the influence of the digital environment, which is changing cognitive, emotional and behavioral selection mechanisms and intensifying intergenerational differences. Of particular interest is the comparison of representatives of generations Y and Z, who were formed in different sociohistorical conditions and have different experiences of digital socialization, which is important for understanding their behavior in education, work, consumption and online communications.
Objective. To identify and describe the features of decision-making among representatives of generations Y and Z, taking into account cognitive styles, emotional regulation strategies, risk-taking propensity and the nature of interaction with the digital environment in the Russian socio-cultural context.
Hypothesis. 1) representatives of generation Z are characterized by a more impulsive and emotionally determined decisionmaking style compared to generation Y; 2) representatives of generation Y are more inclined to rational analysis and decision planning; 3) the digital environment is a significant factor that enhances the emotional impact on the decision-making process and structures this process differently among representatives of generations Y and Z.
Methods and materials. The study involved 186 people aged 18 to 44 years, assigned to generations Y (N = 95) and Z (N = 91), with approximately equal gender distribution. The following methods were used: the Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire to evaluate styles (vigilance, avoidance, procrastination, over-vigilance), the questionnaire of emotional regulation by J. Gross (cognitive reappraisal, suppression of expression), A.G. Shmelev's risk-taking propensity scale and the author's questionnaire on interaction with the digital environment (digital dependence in decisions, digital emotional regulation, digital self-control, preference for digital social interaction, digital trust and literacy).
Results. Generation Y demonstrated higher rates of vigilance and cognitive reappraisal, as well as more pronounced digital self-control and digital literacy, indicating a rational and analytical decision-making style. Generation Z showed significantly higher levels of procrastination, avoidance, hyper-vigilance, risk-taking, digital dependence in decision-making and the use of digital means for emotional regulation, as well as a preference for digital social interaction, reflecting a more impulsive and emotionally intense decision-making style in conditions of high reliance on the digital environment.
Conclusions. It has been confirmed that representatives of generations Y and Z differ in cognitive styles, emotional regulation, risk-taking propensity, and ways to integrate the digital environment into the decision-making process, which makes it necessary to take into account generational characteristics in the practice of education, personnel management, and the development of digital services. When designing educational and organizational programs, it is recommended to rely on the more pronounced rationality and self-control of generation Y and at the same time take into account impulsivity, digital inclusion and the need for emotional support from the digital environment of generation Z.

1. Зверева, Е.А., Хворова, В.А. (2020). Поколения Y и Z: особенности медиапотребления. Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология, Журналистика, 19(6), 131—140. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-6-131-140
   Zvereva, E.A., Khvorova, V.A. (2020). Generations Y and Z: features of media consumption. Bulletin of the NSU. Series: History, Philology, Journalism, 19(6), 131—140. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-6-131-140 (In Russ.).
2. Канеман, Д. (2023). Думай медленно... Решай быстро. Перевод с английского А. Андреева и др. Москва: АСТ.
   Kahneman, D. (2023). Think slowly... Decide quickly. Translated from English by A. Andreev and others. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.).
3. Карпов, А.В. (2013). Эксперимент в исследованиях процессов принятия решения: проблемы и перспективы. Экспериментальная психология, 6(2), 5—18. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/exppsy/archive/2013_n2/61758 (дата обращения: 11.12.2025).
   Karpov, A.V. (2013). An experiment in the research of decision-making processes: problems and prospects. Experimental Psychology, 6(2), 5—18. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/exppsy/archive/2013_n2/61758. (In Russ.).
4. Корнилова, Т.В. (2022). Латентные личностные профили стилевой регуляции принятия решений. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 30(2), 126—145. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300208
   Kornilova, T.V. (2022). Latent personality profiles of stylistic regulation of decision-making. Consultative Psychology and Psychotherapy, 30(2), 126—145. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300208 (In Russ.).
5. Корнилова, Т.В. (2013). Мельбурнский опросник принятия решений: русскоязычная адаптация. Психологические исследования, 6(31), 4. URL: https://psystudy.ru/num/article/view/671/353 (дата обращения: 06.06.2025).
   Kornilova, T.V. (2013). Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire: Russian-language adaptation. Psychological research, 6(31), 4. URL: https://psystudy.ru/num/article/view/671/353  (accessed: 06.06.2025). (In Russ.).
6. Лапидус, Л.В., Гостилович, А.О., Омарова, Ш.А. (2020). Особенности проникновения цифровых технологий в жизнь поколения Z: ценности, поведенческие паттерны и потребительские привычки интернет-поколения. Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 83, 271—293. https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10119
   Lapidus, L.V., Gostilovich, A.O., Omarova, S.A. (2020). Features of digital technology penetration into the life of generation Z: values, behavioral patterns and consumer habits of the Internet generation. Public administration. Electronic Bulletin, 83, 271—293. https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10119 (In Russ.).
7. Моросанова, В.И., Филиппова, Е.В., Фомина, Т.Г. (2023). Осознанная саморегуляция и академическая мотивация как ресурсы выполнения обучающимися проектно-исследовательской работы. Психологическая наука и образование, 28(3), 47—61. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280304
   Morosanova, V.I., Filippova, E.V., Fomina, T.G. (2023). Conscious self-regulation and academic motivation as resources for students to perform design and research work. Psychological Science and Education, 28(3), 47—61. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280304 (In Russ.).
8. Панкратова, А.А., Корниенко, Д.С. (2017). Русскоязычная адаптация опросника ERQ (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) Дж. Гросса. Вопросы психологии, 5, 139—149.
   Pankratova, A.A., Kornienko, D.S. (2017). Russian-language adaptation of the ERQ (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) questionnaire by J. Gross. Questions of Psychology, 5, 139—149. (In Russ.).
9. Пищик, В.И. (2026). Ментальность поколений в текучей современности. М.: Инфра-М.
   Pishchik, V.I. (2026). Mentality of generations in the fluid modernity. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russ.).
10. Пищик, В.И. (2021). Психологические характеристики «Нового» поколения: гомогенность vs гетерогенность. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, 18(1), 42—63. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-42-63
    Pishchik, V.I. (2021). Psychological characteristics of the "New" generation: homogeneity vs heterogeneity. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy, 18(1), 42—63. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-42-63 (In Russ.).
11. Попова, О.И., Тимохина, Г.С., Изакова, Н.Б. (2023). Ценностные установки представителей разных поколений в процессе принятия решений о выборе вуза и образовательной программы. Мир (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие), 14(4), 636—653. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.4.636-653
    Popova, O.I., Timokhina, G.S., Izakova, N.B. (2023). Valuable attitudes of representatives of different generations in the decision-making process on choosing a university and educational program. The world (Modernization. Innovation. Development), 14(4), 636—653. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.4.636-653 (In Russ.).
12. Рикель, А.М., Дорохов, Е.А. (2023). Поколение как предмет социальной психологии: исследовать нельзя отказаться? Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14. Психология, 46(3), 143—165. https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-23-31
    Rikel, A.M., Dorokhov, E.A. (2023). Generation as a subject of social psychology: can you not refuse to explore? Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 14. Psychology, 46(3), 143—165. DOI:10.11621/LPJ-23-31 (In Russ.).
13. Солдатова, Г.У., Трифонова, А.В. (2018). Медиамногозадачность: стоит ли беспокоиться. Дети в информационном обществе, 28, 26—37.
    Soldatova, G.U., Trifonova, A.V. (2018). Media multitasking: is it worth worrying about. Children in the Information Society, 28, 26—37. (In Russ.).
14. Солдатова, Г.У., Чигарькова, С.В., Илюхина, С.Н. (2022). Представления о реальном и виртуальном пространствах как часть актуальной картины мира подростков и родителей в цифровом обществе: возможности адаптации. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология, 12(3), 226— https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.301
    Soldatova, G.U., Chigarkova, S.V., Ilyukhina, S.N. (2022). Perceptions of real and virtual spaces as part of the current worldview of adolescents and parents in a digital society: opportunities for adaptation. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Psychology, 12(3), 226—248. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.301 (In Russ.).
15. Твендж, Дж.М. (2019). Поколение I. М.: РИПОЛ классик.
    Twenge, J.M. (2019). Generation I. Moscow: RIPOLL Classic. (In Russ.).
16. Третьякова, В.С., Церковникова, Н.Г. (2021). Цифровое поколение: потери и приобретения. Профессиональное образование и рынок труда, 2, 53— https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2021.45.2.004
    Tretyakova, V.S., Tserkovnikova, N.G. (2021). The digital generation: losses and gains. Vocational Education and the Labor Market, 2, 53—65. https://doi.org/10.52944/PORT.2021.45.2.004 (In Russ.).
17. Шмелев, А.Г. (2002). Психодиагностика личностных черт. СПб.: Речь.
    Shmelev, A.G. (2002). Psychodiagnostics of personality traits. St. Petersburg: Speech. (In Russ.).
18. Щербакова, О.И., Осипов, В.П. (2025). Особенности взаимодействия поколений X, Y, Z. Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Психология», 3, 58—66. https://doi.org/10.24147/2410-6364.2025.3.58-66
    Shcherbakova, O.I., Osipov, V.P. (2025). Features of the interaction of generations X, Y, Z. Bulletin of Omsk University. Psychology series, 3, 58—66. https://doi.org/10.24147/2410-6364.2025.3.58-66 (In Russ.).
19. Imjai, N., Chansamran, S., Sungthong, S., Usman, B., Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). Developing employability digital competencies of Thai Gen Z business students: The role and matter of digital learning environments and digital adaptation skills, The International Journal of Management Education, 23(3), 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101219
20. Kazemy, H., Ravari, A., Kamiab, Z., Iranmanesh, F., Mirzaei, T. (2026). Integrating AI-supported adaptive learning with cooperative jigsaw strategy for generation Z nursing students: A mixed-methods study. Next Research, 6, 101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101426
21. Kwon, S., Lee, T. (2025). Path Analysis of Career Decision-Making Among Nursing Students: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Asian Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2025.09.002
22. Pui Hang Choi, E. (2026). Digital professionalism and the evolving identity of nursing students in the social media era. Nurse Education Today, 160, 107002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107002
23. Ru-Zhue, J., Imjai, N., Yordudom, T., Kongrode, J., Sumiati, S., Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). How do the role of digital connectivity capabilities and heuristic thinking skills shape the development of digital marketing competency in Gen Z marketing students? The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101157
24. Tutar, H., Erdem, A.T., Karademir, Ö. (2022). Moderator role of old and new Y generation differences in the effect of perceptions of self-efficiency on decision-making strategies. Management Research Review, 45(5), 619—634. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0026
25. Zare, S., Lattanzi, N., di Minin, A. (2025). Decision-making dynamics of digital user innovators: A temporal and regional perspective. International Journal of Innovation Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.10.003
26. Zhang, C., Ha, L., Liu, X., Wang, Y. (2018). The role of regulatory focus in decision making of mobile app download: A study of Chinese college students. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2107—2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.012