Расширение я как психологический конструкт для исследования религиозных феноменов без опоры на религиозные представления

Аннотация

Я-концепция обычно рассматривается в контексте либо индивида, либо социума; иногда это понятие трактуется в биологическом, экологическом или временнjм аспекте. Каждая из этих позиций в отдельности дает определенные преимущества, однако этим подходам не хватает концептуального единства. Понятие «расширение Я» предоставляет возможность изучать Я-концепцию, выходя за пределы узкой индивидуалистической идентификации к более широким биологической, экологической и временной идентификациям и даже к чрезвычайно широким трансперсональным идентификациям. Это понятие представлено как интегрирующая схема, дающая целостное понимание Я-концепции, свободное от опоры на религиозные представления, но тем не менее позволяющее обращаться ко многим религиозным феноменам. В статье также дается обзор эмпирических исследований, посвященных понятию «расширение Я».

Общая информация

Рубрика издания: Специальная тема выпуска

Для цитаты: Фридмэн Х.Л. Расширение я как психологический конструкт для исследования религиозных феноменов без опоры на религиозные представления // Психология. 2007. Том 4. № 4. С. 101–112.

Литература

  1. Allik J., Realo A. Individualism-collectivism and social capital // Journal of CrossCultural Psychology. 2004. 35 (1). 29-49.
  2. Aron A., Aron E. Love as the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere, 1986.
  3. Aron A., Aron E. Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model // Personal Relationships. 1996. 3. 45-58.
  4. Aron A., Aron E., Tudor M., Nelson G. Close relationships as including other in the self // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. 60 (2). 241-253.
  5. Bartz J., Lydon J. Close relationships and the working self
  6. Bragg E. Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self
  7. Burris C., Rempel J. «It's the end of the world as we know it»: Threat and the spatial-symbolic self // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. 86 (1). 19-42.
  8. Bursten L. Constructed realities and transformation of consciousness: A holonomic approach. Ann Arbor, MI: Dissertation Abstracts International, 1989.
  9. Byrne B. Validating the measurement and structure of self
  10. Carr A. The «Separation Thesis» of self and other: Metatheorizing a dialectical alternative. Theory & Psychology. 2003. 13(1). 117-138.
  11. Chen S., Chen K., Shaw L. Self-verification motives at the collective level of selfdefinition // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. 86 (1). 77-94.
  12. Cloninger C. The Temperament and Character Inventory, Version 1995a, Revised 4
  13. Cronbach L., Meehl P. Construct validity of psychological tests // Psychological Bulletin. 1955. 52. 281-302.
  14. Diehl M., Owen S.K., Youngblade L.M. Agency and communion in adults' self representations // International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2004. 28. 1-15.
  15. Esposito A., Kobak R., Little M. Aggression and self
  16. Foddy M., Kashima Y. Social-cognitive models of the self // Y. Kashima, M. Foddy, M. Platow (eds.). Self and Identity: Personal, Social and Symbolic. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002. P. 3-25.
  17. Frager R., Fadiman J. Personality and personal growth. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.
  18. Friedman H. The Self
  19. Friedman H. Transpersonal psychology as a scientific field // International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2002. 21. 175-187.
  20. Friedman H. Frameworks for peace: Reframing the conflict in Fiji // International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2004. 23. 118-124.
  21. Friedman H. Transpersonal frameworks for peace: Fiji and Palestine // J. Drew, D. Lorimer (eds.). A way through the wall: Spiritual and transpersonal approaches to the world of today (pp. 47-58). Glouces
  22. Friedman H., MacDonald D. Towards a working definition of transpersonal assessment // Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1997. 29. 105-122.
  23. Friedman H., MacDonald D. (eds.). Transpersonal measurement and assessment. San Francisco: The Transpersonal Institute, 2002a.
  24. Friedman H., MacDonald D. Using transpersonal tests in humanistic psychological assessment // The Humanistic Psychologist. 2002b. 30. 223-236.
  25. Friedman H., MacDonald, D., Kumar K. Cross
  26. Gaertner L., Sedikides C., Graetz K. In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? // Journal of Personality and So
  27. Gaynor D. Changes in cognitive structure associated with experiences of spiritual transformation. Ann Arbor, MI: Dissertation Abstracts International, 1999.
  28. Gilgen A., Cho J. Questionnaire to measure Eastern and Western thought // Psychological Reports. 1979. 40. 266-275.
  29. Guzma C. Creativity, spirituality, and self-expansiveness in the process of writing popular music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saybrook Graduate School, San Francisco, 2003.
  30. Hill P., Hood R. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press, 1999.
  31. Hood R. The construction and prelimi
  32. James W. The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1890.
  33. Kashima Y., Kokubo T., Kashima E., Bo1 xall D., Yamaguchi S., Macrae K. Culture and self: Are there within-culture differences in self between metropolitan areas and regional cities? // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004. 30 (7). 816-823.
  34. Kuhar R. A phenomenological inquiry into the impact of education and engagement in science on scientists' metaphysical beliefs and spirituality. Unpublished docto
  35. Kustner U. Effectiveness of a meditative method of therapy based on Buddhist psychology and practice: A pilot study // Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research. 2002. 2. 31-47.
  36. Leary M. R., Tangney J.P. The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral sciences // M. R. Leary, J. P. Tangney (eds.). Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press, 2003. P. 3-14.
  37. Lewis Y. The self as a moral concept // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2003. 42. 225-237.
  38. Lieberman M., Jarcho J., Satput A. Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: An fMRI study // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. 87 (4). 421-435.
  39. Lindsey1North J. Fanning the flame: Transforming teachers by fostering transpersonal understandings through the arts. Ann Arbor, MI: Dissertation Abstracts International, 1999.
  40. MacDonald D., Friedman H. Assessment of humanistic, transpersonal and spiritual constructs: State of the science // Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2002. 42. 102-125.
  41. MacDonald D., Gagnier J., Friedman H. The Self-Expansiveness Level Form: Examination of its validity and relation to the NEO Personality Inventory Revised // Psychological Reports. 2000. 86. 707-726.
  42. MacDonald D., Friedman H., Kuentzel J. A survey of measures of spiritual and transpersonal constructs: Part one
  43. MacDonald D., Kuentzel J., Friedman H. A survey of measures of spiritual and transpersonal constructs: Part two
  44. MacDonald D., LeClair L., Holland C., Alter A., Friedman H. A survey of measures of transpersonal constructs // Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1995. 27. 1-66.
  45. MacDonald D., Tsagarakis C., Holland C. Validation of a measure of transpersonal self-concept and its relationship to Jungian and five factor model conceptions of personality // Journal of Transpersonal Psycho
  46. Majeski R. The relationship of transpersonal self
  47. Markus H. R., Kitayama S. A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994. 20. 568-579.
  48. Marsh H.W. The measurement of physical self
  49. Marx D., Stapel D., Muller D.We can do it: The interplay of construal organization and social comparisons under threat // Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2005. 88 (3). 432-446.
  50. Mayer F., Frantz C. The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2004. 24. 503-515.
  51. Miller W., Thorensen C. Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field // American Psychologist. 2003. 58. 24-35.
  52. Newby1Clark I., Ross M. Conceiving the past and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. 29 (7). 807-818.
  53. Pappas J. A construct validity study of the Self-Expansiveness Level Form: A multitrait-multimethod matrix and criterion approach. Ann Arbor, MI: Dissertation Abstracts International, 2003.
  54. Pappas J. The veridicality of nonconventional cognitions: Conceptual and measurement issues in transpersonal psychology // The Humanistic Psychologist. 2004. 32. 169-197.
  55. Pappas J., Friedman H. The construct of self
  56. Pappas J., Friedman H. Scientific transpersonal psychology and cultural diversity: Focus on measurement in research and clinical practice // W. Smythe, A. Baydala (eds.). Public Mind: Mellen studies in psychology.Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 2004. Vol. 9. P. 303-345.
  57. Pederson D.M. Identification of levels of self-identity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1994. 78. 1155-1167.
  58. Piedmont R. Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model // Journal of Personality. 1999. 67. 985-1013.
  59. Poll J.B., Smith T.B. The spiritual self: Toward a conceptualization of spiritual identity development // Journal of Psychology and Theology. 2003. 31. 129-142.
  60. Reinert D. Spirituality, self
  61. Richards S., Bergin A. Toward religious and spiritual competency for mental health professionals // S. Richards & A. Bergin (eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000. P. 3-26.
  62. Robbins L., Pis M., Pender N. Physical activity self-definition among adolescents. Research & Theory for Nursing Practice: // International Journal. 2004. 18 (4). 317-330.
  63. Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
  64. Salsman J., Brown T., Brechting E., Carlson R. The link between religion and spirituality and psychological adjustment: the mediating role of optimism and social support // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005. 31 (4). 522-535.
  65. Shapiro S., Fitzgerald L. The development of an objective scale to measure a transpersonal orientation to learning // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1989. 49. 375-384.
  66. Shavelson R.J., Hubner J.J., Stanton G.C. Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations // Review of Educational Research. 1976. 46. 407-441.
  67. Slater W. E., Hall T.W., Edwards K.J. Measuring religion and spirituality: Where are we and where are we going? // Journal of Psychology and Theology. 2001. 29. 4-21.
  68. St. John D. An ecopsychological self: Model and measure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Detroit Mercy, Michigan, 2004.
  69. Tsang J., McCullough M. Measuring religious constructs: A hierarchical approach // S. Lopez, C. R. Snyder (eds.). Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2003. P. 345-360.
  70. Upton J. Measures of personality and transpersonality: Correlations between the «Big Five» factors of the NEO PI-R and fi ve transpersonal inventories. Ann Arbor, MI: Dissertation Abstracts International, 1998.
  71. Vispoel W.P. Self
  72. Wang L. Using zero
  73. Webb J. Organizations, self-identities, and the new economy // Sociology. 2004. 38 (4). 719-738.
  74. Weiss M., Amorose A. Children's selfperceptions in the physical domain. // Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2005. 27 (2). 226-244.
  75. Wylie R.C. The self-concept: Vol. 2. Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.

Информация об авторах

Метрики

Просмотров

Всего: 1592
В прошлом месяце: 7
В текущем месяце: 0