-
Andringa S. et al. Determinants of Success in Native and
Non-Native Listening Comprehension: An Individual Differences Approach //
Language Learning. 2012. № SUPPL. 2 (62). C. 49–78.
-
Armstrong R. et al. Change in receptive vocabulary from
childhood to adulthood: associated mental health, education and employment
outcomes // International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders.
2017.
-
Asimina, Ralli M., Melpomeni S., Alexandra T. Language and
Psychosocial Skills of Institutionalized Children in Greece // The Open Family
Studies Journal. 2017. № 1 (9). C. 76–87.
-
Baker F.B. The basics of item response theory / F.B.
Baker, ERIC, 2001. 186 c.
-
Beck I.L., McKeown M.G. Increasing young low-income
children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction //
Elementary School Journal. 2007. № 3 (107). C. 251–271.
-
Bent T. et al. Individual differences in the perception of
regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties // The Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America. 2016. № 5 (140). C. 3775–3786.
-
Beverly B.L., McGuinness T.M., Blanton D.J. Communication
and academic challenges in early adolescence for children who have been adopted
from the former Soviet Union // Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in
Schools. 2008. № 3 (39). C. 303–313.
-
Biemiller A., Slonim N. Estimating root word vocabulary
growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence
of vocabulary acquisition // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001.
-
Bock R.D., Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood
estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm // Psychometrika.
1981. № 4 (46). C. 443–459.
-
Carrow-Woolfolk E. Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken
Language–Second Edition (CASL-2). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services,
2017.
-
Chalmers R.P. Mirt: A multidimensional item response
theory package for the R environment // Journal of Statistical Software. 2012.
№ 6 (48).
-
Chalmers R.P., Counsell A., Flora D.B. It Might Not Make a
Big DIF: Improved Differential Test Functioning Statistics That Account for
Sampling Variability // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2016. № 1
(76). C. 114–140.
-
Cunningham A.E., Stanovich K.E. What Reading Does for the
Mind // American Educator. 1998. № 1 (22). C. 137–149.
-
Desmarais C. et al. Sentence comprehension in
postinstitutionalized school-age children // Journal of Speech, Language, and
Hearing Research. 2012. № 1 (55). C. 45–54.
-
Drasgow F., Lissak R.I. Modifi ed parallel analysis: A
procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item
responses. // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1983.
-
Dunn D.M. Peabody picture vocabulary test-fi fth edition.
Bloomington, MN.: Pearson, 2019.
-
Embretson S.E., Reise S.P. Item response theory for
psychologists Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2000.
-
Fernald A., Marchman V.A., Weisleder A. SES differences in
language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months //
Developmental Science. 2013.
-
Fromkin V. et al. The development of language in genie: a
case of language acquisition beyond the “critical period” // Brain and
Language. 1974. № 1 (1). C. 81–107.
-
Gindis B. Cognitive, Language, and Educational Issues of
Children Adopted from Overseas Orphanages // Journal of Cognitive Education and
Psychology. 2005. № 3 (4). C. 291–315.
-
Glennen S., Bright B.J. Five years later: Language in
school-age internationally adopted children // Seminars in Speech and Language.
2005. Т. 26. № 1. 86–101 с.
-
Goulden R., Nation P., Read J. How large can a receptive
vocabulary be? // Applied Linguistics. 1990. № 4 (11). C. 341–363.
-
Greenough W.T., Black J.E., Wallace C.S. Experience and
brain development. // Child development. 1987. № 3 (58). C. 539–559.
-
Hammill D.D. et al. TOAL-4: Test of Adolescent and Adult
Language—Fourth Edition // 2007.
-
Hart B., Risley T.R. Meaningful differences in the
everyday experience of young American children. / B. Hart, T.R. Risley, Paul H
Brookes Publishing, 1995.
-
Hart B., Risley T.R. The early catastrophe: The 30 million
word gap by age 3 // American educator. 2003. № 1 (27). C. 4–9.
-
Hemphill L., Tivnan T. The Importance of Early Vocabulary
for Literacy Achievement in High-Poverty Schools // Journal of Education for
Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR). 2008. № 4 (13). C. 426–451.
-
Hiebert E.H., Kamil M.L. Teaching and learning vocabulary:
Bringing research to practice Routledge, 2005. 1–279 с.
-
Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors
in factor analysis // Psychometrika. 1965. № 2 (30). C. 179–185.
-
Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fi t indexes in
covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives //
Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. № 1 (6). C. 1–55.
-
Ivanova M. et al. AutoRAT at your fi ngertips: Introducing
the new Russian Aphasia Test on a tablet // Frontiers in Psychology. 2016.
(7).
-
Janse E., Jesse A. Working memory affects older adults’
use of context in spoken-word recognition // Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology. 2014. № 9 (67). C. 1842–1862.
-
Johnson M.S. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of
item response models in R // Journal of Statistical Software. 2007. № 10 (20).
C. 1–24.
-
Kamata A., Bauer D.J. A note on the relation between
factor analytic and item response theory models // Structural Equation
Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2008. № 1 (15). C. 136–153.
-
Kornilov S.A. et al. Language Outcomes in Adults with a
History of Institutionalization: Behavioral and Neurophysiological
Characterization // Scientifi c Reports. 2019. № 1 (9). C. 4252.
-
Langer M.M. et al. Item response theory detected
differential item functioning between healthy and ill children in
quality-of-life measures // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008. № 3 (61).
C. 268–276.
-
Linden W.J. van der Handbook of item response theory CRC
Press, 2016. 1–595 с.
-
Loman M.M. et al. Postinstitutionalized children’s
development: Growth, cognitive, and language outcomes // Journal of
Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2009. № 5 (30). C. 426–434.
-
Lord F.M. Applications of item response theory to
practical testing problems Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
1–274 с.
-
Magis D. et al. A general framework and an R package for
the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning // Behavior Research
Methods. 2010. № 3 (42). C. 847–862.
-
Martinková P. et al. Checking equity: Why differential
item functioning analysis should be a routine part of developing conceptual
assessments // CBE Life Sciences Education. 2017. № 2 (16). C. rm2.
-
Mayberry R.I. Cognitive development in deaf children: The
interface of language and perception in neuropsychology // Handbook of
Neuropsychology. 2002. № Part II (8). C. 71–107.
-
McDermott J. et al. Psychosocial deprivation, executive
functions, and the emergence of socioemotional behavior problems // Frontiers
in Human Neuroscience. 2013. Т. 7. 167 с.
-
McGregor K.K. et al. Children with developmental language
impairment have vocabulary defi cits characterized by limited breadth and depth
// International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2013. № 3
(48). C. 307–319.
-
Merz E.C., McCall R.B., Wright A.J. Attention and language
as mediators of academic outcomes following early psychosocial deprivation //
International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2013. № 5 (37). C.
451–459.
-
Milton J., Treffers-Daller J. Vocabulary size revisited:
The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement // Applied
Linguistics Review. 2013.
-
Muhamedrahimov R.J. et al. Structural characteristics of
the institutional environment for young children // Psychology in Russia: State
of the Art. 2016.
-
Nation K. Lexical learning and lexical processing in
children with developmental language impairments // Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014. Т. 369. № 1634. 20120387
с.
-
National Reading Panel Teaching children to read: An
evidence-based assessment of the scientific c research literature on reading
and its implications for reading instruction // NIH Publication No. 00-4769.
2000.
-
Paek I., Cole K. Using R for Item Response Theory Model
Applications / I. Paek, K. Cole, Routledge, 2019.
-
Quinn J.M., Wagner R.K. Using Meta-analytic Structural
Equation Modeling to Study Developmental Change in Relations Between Language
and Literacy // Child Development. 2018. № 6 (89). C. 1956–1969.
-
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for
statistical computing. // Accessed 1st April 2019. 2019.
-
Raju N.S. The area between two item characteristic curves
// Psychometrika. 1988. № 4 (53). C. 495–502.
-
Reise S.P., Henson J.M. A discussion of modem versus
traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales //
Journal of personality assessment. 2003. № 2 (81). C. 93–103.
-
Richland L.E., Burchinal M.R. Early Executive Function
Predicts Reasoning Development // Psychological Science. 2012. № 1 (24). C.
87–92.
-
Rizopoulos D. Itm: An R package for latent variable
modeling and item response theory analyses // Journal of Statistical Software.
2006. № 5 (17). C. 1–25.
-
Rodríguez-Aranda C., Jakobsen M. Differential contribution
of cognitive and psychomotor functions to the age-related slowing of speech
production // Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2011. №
5 (17). C. 807–821.
-
Scott K.A., Roberts J.A., Glennen S. How well do children
who are internationally adopted acquire language? a meta-analysis // Journal of
Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2011. № 4 (54). C. 1153–1169.
-
Shao Z. et al. What do verbal fl uency tasks measure?
Predictors of verbal fl uency performance in older adults // Frontiers in
Psychology. 2014. № JUL (5). C. 772.
-
Stahl S.A., Fairbanks M.M. The Effects of Vocabulary
Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis // Review of Educational Research.
1986.
-
Steinberg L., Thissen D. Item response theory. Oxford
library of psychology. / New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 2013.
336–373 с.
-
Takane Y., Leeuw J. De On the relationship between item
response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables // Psychometrika.
1987. № 3 (52). C. 393–408.
-
Tirella L.G. et al. Time use in Russian Baby Homes //
Child: Care, Health and Development. 2008.
-
Unsworth N., Spillers G.J., Brewer G.A. Variation in
verbal fl uency: A latent variable analysis of clustering, switching, and
overall performance // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011. № 3
(64). C. 447–466.
-
Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale–Fourth
Edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: Pearson, 2008.
-
Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children–Fifth
Edition (WISC-V) Bloomington, MN: Pearson, 2014.
-
Widhiarso W., Haryanta Examining method effect of synonym
and antonym test in verbal abilities measure // Europe’s Journal of Psychology.
2015.
-
Wiig E.H., Secord W.A., Semel E. Clinical evaluation of
language fundamentals: CELF-5 Bloomington, MN: Pearson, 2013.
-
Williams K. Expressive vocabulary test, third edition.
Bloomington, MN: Pearson, 2018.
-
Windsor J. et al. Language acquisition with limited input:
Romanian institution and foster care // Journal of Speech, Language, and
Hearing Research. 2007. № 5 (50). C. 1365–1381.
-
Windsor J. et al. Effect of foster care on young
children’s language learning // Child Development. 2011. № 4 (82). C.
1040–1046.
-
Windsor J. et al. Effect of foster care on language
learning at eight years: Findings from the Bucharest early intervention project
// Journal of Child Language. 2013. № 3 (40). C. 605–627.
-
Yap M.J. et al. Individual differences in visual word
recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project // Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2012. № 1 (38). C.
53–79.
-
Zanon C. et al. An application of item response theory to
psychological test development // Psicologia: Refl exão e Crítica. 2016. № 1
(29). C. 1–10.
-
Прихода Н.А. Оценка развития русского языка (ОРРЯ) как
стандартизованная методика диагностики коммуникативной функции у детей от 3 до
9 лет // Психологическая наука и образование. 2016. № 3 (21). C. 25–33.