Клинические случаи курсового применения транскраниальной микрополяризации как поддерживающей стратегии при терапии модификации искаженного внимания у подростков 126
Вацлавик Д. магистр психологии, соискатель факультета психологии, Центр семьи и детства, Международный университет Флориды, США ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-6487 e-mail: dvaclavi@fiu.edu
Фостер А. магистр направления психиатрии, департамент психиатрии и поведенческого здоровья,, Международный университет Флориды, США ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-4160 e-mail: adfoster@fiu.edu
Гральник Л.М, магистр направления психиатрии, департамент психиатрии и поведенческого здоровья, Международный университет Флориды, США ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-340X e-mail: gralnikl@fiu.edu
Бар-Хаим Я. PhD, Адлерский центр исследований детского развития и психопатологии, факультет психологии, Тель-Авивский университет, Тель-Авив, Израиль ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-9180 e-mail: yair1@post.tau.ac.il
Пайн Д.С. магистр направления психиатрии, программа очных исследований, Национальный институт психического здоровья, Бетесда, США ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-9516 e-mail: pined@mail.nih.gov
В данной статье представлены клинические случаи прохождения курсов транскраниальной микрополяризации (tDCS) с целью оценки обоснованности, приемлемости и клинических перспектив данного метода в качестве поддерживающей стратегии у подростков, направленных в клинику. Терапия модификации искаженного внимания (Attention Bias Modification Treatment, ABMT) – это компьютерный протокол тренировки внимания, разработанный для снижения непроизвольного переключения внимания на источники кажущейся угрозы
и, соответственно, для уменьшения тяжести симптомов тревоги. Исследования эффективности ABMT демонстрируют его умеренную общую результативность. Достижения в исследованиях нейронных механизмов внимания к угрозам
и протоколов тренировки внимания указывают на высокий потенциал транскраниальной микрополяризации применительно к дорсолатеральной префронтальной коре в качестве новой поддерживающей стратегии повышения эффективности ABMT (ABMT + tDCS). Однако метод tDCS никогда не проверялся на выборке подростков с тревожными расстройствами. Шесть подростков с первичным тревожным расстройством прошли все четыре сеанса ABMT + tDCS. Побочные эффекты были легкими и временными. Подростки и родители независимо друг от друга сообщали о среднем или высоком уровне удовлетворенности результатами терапии. У подростков, прошедших курс ABMT + tDCS, значимо снизились первичные симптомы тревожного расстройства. Кроме того, электрофизиологические данные (в частности, результаты ЭЭГ) свидетельствовали об уменьшении нейронной активности, вызванной ситуацией воспринимаемой угрозы. Полученные результаты подтверждают обоснованность и перспективность применения tDCS в качестве поддерживающей стратегии у подростков с тревожными расстройствами, что дает импульс для дальнейших исследований контрольных групп с более крупными выборками.
Финансирование. Настоящее исследование поддержано Национальным институтом здоровья США (R25 GM061347, UH2 MH101470 и R01 MH119299). Содержание исследования является исключительной ответственностью авторов и может не являться отражением официальной позиции Национального института здоровья
Благодарности. Авторы благодарят доктора Грега Хайака за его вклад в настоящее исследование.
Ссылка для цитирования
Литература
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Association, 1994. 866 p.
Bar-Haim Y., Lamy D., Glickman S. Attentional bias in
anxiety: A behavioral and ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 2005. Vol. 59,
no. 1, pp. 11–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005 .03.005
Bar-Haim Y., Lamy D., Pergamin L. et al. Threat-related
attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.
Psychological Bulletin, 2007. Vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 1–24. DOI:
10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
Batty M., Taylor M.J. The development of emotional face
processing during childhood. Developmental Science, 2006. Vol. 9, no. 2,
pp. 207–220.
Bechor M., Pettit J.W., Silverman W.K. et al. Attention
bias modification treatment for children with anxiety disorders who do not
respond to cognitive behavioral therapy: a case series. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders, 2014. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 154–159. DOI: 10.1016/
j.janxdis.2013.09.001
Bechor M., Ramos M.L., Crowley M.J. et al. Neural
correlates of attentional processing to threat in youth with and without
anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2019. Vol. 47,
no. 1, pp. 119–129. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-018-0424-8
Bikson M., Name A., Rahman A. Origins of specificity
during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7, article number 688. DOI:
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00688
Birmaher B., Khetarpal S., Brent D. et al. The Screen for
Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and
psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, 1997. Vol. 36, no. 4,
pp. 545–553. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018
Britton J.C., Suway J.G., Clementi M.A. et al. Neural
changes with attention bias modification for anxiety: a randomized trial.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014. Vol. 10, no. 7, pp.
913–920. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu141
Brown H.M., Eley T.C., Broeren S. et al. Psychometric
properties of reaction time based experimental paradigms measuring
anxiety-related information-processing biases in children. Journal of
Anxiety Disorders, 2014. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 97–107. DOI: 10.1016/
j.janxdis.2013.11.004
Browning M., Holmes E.A., Murphy S.E. et al. Lateral
prefrontal cortex mediates the cognitive modification of attentional bias.
Biological Psychiatry, 2010. Vol. 67, no. 10,
pp. 919–925. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.031
Brunoni A.R., Amadera J., Berbel B. et al. A systematic
review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with
transcranial direct current stimulation. International Journal of
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011. Vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1133–1145. DOI:
10.1017/S1461145710001690
Brunoni A.R., Nitsche M.A., Bolognini N. et al. Clinical
research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and
future directions. Brain Stimulation, 2012. Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 175–195.
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002
Clarke P.J., Browning M., Hammond G. et al. The causal
role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the modification of attentional
bias: evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation. Biological
Psychiatry, 2014. Vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 946–952. DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.003
Compton S.N., March J.S., Brent D. et al.
Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for anxiety and depressive disorders in
children and adolescents: An evidence-based medicine review. Journal of the
American Academy Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004. Vol. 43,
no. 8, pp. 930–959. DOI: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000127589.57468.BF
Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for
analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.
Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2004. Vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 9–21. DOI:
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Dudeney J., Sharpe L., Hunt C. Attentional bias towards
threatening stimuli in children with anxiety: a meta-analysis. Clinical
Psychology Review, 2015. Vol. 40, pp. 66–75. DOI:
10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.007
Eldar S., Bar-Haim Y. Neural plasticity in response to
attention training in anxiety. Psychological Medicine, 2009. Vol. 40,
no. 4, pp. 667–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0033291709990766
Eldar S., Yankelevitch R., Lamy D. et al. Enhanced neural
reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety. Biological
Psychology, 2010. Vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 252–257. DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.07.010
Fu X., Taber-Thomas B.C., Perez-Edgar K. Frontolimbic
functioning during threat-related attention: Relations to early behavioral
inhibition and anxiety in children. Biological Psychology, 2015. Vol.
122, pp. 98–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.08.010
Hakamata Y., Lissek S., Bar-Haim Y. et al. Attention bias
modification treatment:
a meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety.
Biological Psychiatry, 2010. Vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 982–990. DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021
Hardee J.E., Benson B.E., Bar-Haim Y. et al. Patterns of
neural connectivity during an attention bias task moderate associations between
early childhood temperament and internalizing symptoms in young adulthood.
Biological Psychiatry, 2013. Vol. 74, no. 4,
pp. 273–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.036
Hariri A.R., Mattay V.S., Tessitore A. et al. Neocortical
modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli. Biological
Psychiatry, 2003. Vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 494–501. DOI:
10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01786-9
Heeren A., Baeken C., Vanderhasselt M.A. et al. Impact of
anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during attention bias modification: an
eye-tracking study. Plos One, 2015. Vol. 10, no. 4, e0124182. DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0124182
Heeren A., Billieux J., Philippot P. et al. Impact of
transcranial direct current stimulation on attentional bias for threat: a
proof-of-concept study among individuals with social anxiety disorder.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2017. Vol. 12, no. 2,
pp. 251–260. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw119
Heeren A., De Raedt R., Koster E.H.W. et al. The (neuro)
cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: Proposals
based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7, article number 119. DOI:
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119
Helfinstein S.M., White L.K., Bar-Haim Y. et al. Affective
primes suppress attention bias to threat in socially anxious individuals.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008.
Vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 799–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.03.011
Ironside M., Browning M., Ansari T.L. et al. Effect of
prefrontal cortex stimulation on regulation of amygdala response to threat in
individuals with trait anxiety:
a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 2018. Vol. 76, no. 1, pp.
71–78. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2172
Kappenman E.S., Farrens J.L., Luck S.J. et al. Behavioral
and ERR measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor
reliablity and lack of correlation with anxiety. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2014. Vol. 5, article number 1368. DOI: 10.3389/
fpsyg.2014.01368
Larsen D.L., Attkisson C.C., Hargreaves W.A. et al.
Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale.
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1979. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 197–207. DOI:
10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6
Li X., Li X., Luo Y. Anxiety and attentional bias for
threat: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport: For Rapid
Communication of Neuroscience Research, 2005. Vol. 16,
no. 13, pp. 1501–1505. DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000176522.26971.83
Linetzky M., Pergamin-Hight L., Pine D.S. et al.
Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification
treatment for anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 2015. Vol. 32,
no. 6, pp. 383–391. DOI: 10.1002/da.22344
Lopez-Calderon J., Luck S.J. ERPLAB: an open-source
toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 2014. Vol. 8, article number 213. DOI:
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
Lowther H., Newman E. Attention bias modification (ABM) as
a treatment for child and adolescent anxiety: a systematic review. Journal
of Affective Disorders, 2014. Vol. 168, pp. 125–135. DOI:
10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.051
MacLeod C., Clarke P.J.F. The attentional bias
modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clinical Psychological
Science, 2015. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 58–78.
MacNamara A., Kappenman E.S., Black S.R. et al.
Integratived behavioral and electrocortical measures of attentional bias toward
threat. In K.C. Barrett, N.A. Fox,
G.A. Morgan, D.J. Fidler, L.A. Daunhauer (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulatory
Processes in Development: New Directions and International Perspectives.
New York: Psychology Press, 2013. Pp. 215–243.
Mogg K., Waters A.M., Bradley B.P. Attention bias
modification (ABM): review of effects of multisession ABM training on anxiety
and threat-related attention in high-anxious individuals. Clinical
Psychological Science, 2017. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 698–717. DOI:
10.1177/2167702617696359
Mühlberger A., Wieser M.J., Herrmann M.J. et al. Early
cortical processing of natural and artificial emotional faces differs between
lower and higher socially anxious persons. Journal of Neural
Transmission, 2009. Vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 735–746. DOI:
10.1007/s00702-008-0108-6
Ollendick T.H., White S.W., Richey J. et al. Attention
bias modification treatment
for adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 2018.
Vol. 50, no. 1,
pp. 126–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.04.002
O'Toole L.J., DeCicco J.M., Berthod S. et al. The N170 to
angry faces predicts anxiety in typically developing children over a two-year
period. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2013. Vol. 38, no. 5, pp.
352–363. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2013.802321
O’Toole L., Dennis T.A. Attention training and the threat
bias: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 2012. Vol. 78, no. 1, pp.
63–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.007
Pergamin-Hight L., Pine D.S., Fox N.A. et al. Attention
bias modification for youth with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 2016. Vol. 57, no. 11, pp.
1317–1325. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12599
Pettit J.W., Bechor M., Rey Y. et al. A randomized
controlled trial of attention bias modification treatment in youth with
treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2020. Vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 157–165. DOI:
10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.018
Pettit J.W., Rey Y., Bechor M. et al. Can less be more?
Open trial of a stepped care approach for child and adolescent anxiety
disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2017.
Vol. 51, pp. 7–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.004
Price R.B., Kuckertz J.M., Siegle G.J. et al. Empirical
recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical
research. Psychological Assessment, 2015.
Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 365–376. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000036
Price R.B., Wallace M., Kuckertz J.M. et al. Pooled
patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based
anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Clinical Psychology
Review, 2016. Vol. 50, pp. 37–49. DOI: 10.1016/ j.cpr.2016.09.009
RUPP Anxiety Study Group. The Pediatric Anxiety Rating
Scale (PARS): development and psychometric properties. Journal of the
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2002. Vol. 41, no. 9,
pp. 1061–1069. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200209000-00006
Schmukle S.C. Unreliability of the dot probe task.
European Journal of Personality, 2005. Vol. 19, no. 7, pp.
595–605.
Schupp H.T., Junghoefer M., Weike A.I. et al. Emotional
facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychological
Science, 2003. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–13. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01411
Seibt O., Brunoni A.R., Huang Y. et al. The pursuit of
DLPFC: non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal
cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation
(tDCS). Brain Stimulation, 2015. Vol. 8, no. 3,
pp. 590–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.401
Silverman W.K., Albano A. The Anxiety Disorders Interview
Schedule for Children–IV (Child and parent versions). San Antonio, TX:
Psychological Corporation, 1996.
Silverman W.K., Pina A.A., Viswesvaran C. Evidence-based
psychosocial treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children and
adolescents. Journal of Clinal Child and Adolescent Psychology, 2008.
Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 105–130. DOI: 10.1080/1537441070 1817907
SPSS. IBM SPSS statistics 22. Algorithms. Chicago: IBM
SPSS Inc., 2013.
Suway J.G., White L.K., Vanderwert R.E. et al.
Modification of threat-processing in non-anxious individuals: A preliminary
behavioral and ERP study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental
Psychiatry, 2013. Vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 285–292. DOI: 10.1016/
j.jbtep.2012.11.006
Taylor C.T., Aupperle R.L., Flagan T. et al. Neural
correlates of a computerized attention modification program in anxious
subjects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014. Vol. 9, no.
9, pp. 1379–1387. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst128
Telzer E.H., Mogg K., Bradley B.P. et al. Relationship
between trait anxiety, prefrontal cortex, and attention bias to angry faces in
children and adolescents. Biological Psychology, 2008. Vol. 79, no. 2,
pp. 216–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.05.004
Thai N., Taber-Thomas B.C., Pérez-Edgar K.E. Neural
correlates of attention biases, behavioral inhibition, and social anxiety in
children: An ERP study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2016. Vol.
19, pp. 200–210.DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.03.008
Walkup J.T., Albano A.M., Piacentini J. et al. Cognitive
behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. New
England Journal of Medicine, 2008. Vol. 359,
no. 26, pp. 2753–2766. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804633
Waters A.M., Craske M.G. Towards a cognitive-learning
formulation of youth anxiety: a narrative review of theory and evidence and
implications for treatment.Clinical Psychology Review, 2016. Vol. 50,
pp. 50–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.008
White L., Sequeira S., Britton J. et al. Complementary
features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive behavioral
therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry,
2017. Vol. 174, no. 8, pp. 775–784. DOI: 10.1176/ appi.ajp.2017.16070847.