Стратегии поведения в межкультурном конфликте: обзор зарубежных исследований ²⁷¹⁶

В статье представлен аналитический обзор зарубежных психологических исследований поведения в межкультурном конфликте. Межкультурный конфликт понимается как межличностный конфликт между представителями различных культур. Анализируются основные модели, описывающие стратегии поведения в межкультурном конфликте: модель двойной заинтересованности, модель стилей межкультурного конфликта, модель идентичности в переговорах. Приводится краткий обзор результатов современных исследований предикторов поведения в межкультурном конфликте, особое внимание уделено анализу влияния культуры и особенностей ситуации межкультурного взаимодействия на выбор стратегии поведения. Описываются наиболее распространенные в зарубежных исследованиях методы изучения выбора стратегии поведения в конфликте. Отмечается важность оценки эффективности используемых стратегий конфликтного поведения в ситуации межкультурного взаимодействия. В заключении обозначаются нерешенные проблемы и актуальные направления в области изучения поведения в межкультурном конфликте.

Ключевые слова: межкультурный конфликт, стратегии конфликтного поведения, культура, предикторы конфликтного поведения

Рубрика: Теоретические исследования

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080305

В последние годы одной из наиболее актуальных исследовательских тем для современной социальной психологии является тема межкультурного взаимодействия в его самых различных формах. Не вызывает сомнений, что подобный интерес к феномену межкультурной в маленькое, тесно взаимодействующее сообщество, и мы обнаруживаем, что все чаще вступаем в контакты с людьми из других культур». При этом анализ зарубежных и отечественных исследований последних лет показывает, что не все аспекты межкультурного взаимодействия изучены достаточно полно. Большинство опубликованных работ направлено на анализ когнитивных, а не поведенческих компонентов взаимодействия, таких как стереотипы, установки и предрассудки.

1. Выготский Л.С. Собрание сочинений: в 6 т. Т. 3 / Академия педагогических наук СССР. М.: Педагогика, 1983. 369 с. Vygotskiy L.S. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 t. T. 6 [Collected works: In 6 vol. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 369 p.
2. Стефаненко Т.Г. Этнописхология: учебник для вузов. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2014. 351 с. Stefanenko T.G. Etnopiskhologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Ethnopsychology: university textbook]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2014. 351 p.
3. Arifin F., Wigati F., Lestari Z. Typical Responses in Giving Evaluation: An Analysis of High and Low Context Culture Communication // Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education. 2013. Vol. 3. Iss. 1. P. 85—92.
4. Burleson B.R., MacGeorge E.L. Supportive communication // Handbook of interpersonal communication / Ed. by M.L. Knapp, J. Daly. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002. P. 374—424.
5. Bar-Tal D. Group beliefs. N.Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1990. 140 p.
6. Bar-Tal D. Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflicts, as it does in the Israeli society? // Political Psychology. 2001. Vol. 22. P. 601—627. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00255
7. Bar-Tal D., Halperin E., Sharvit K., Zafran A. Ethos of Conflict: The Concept and Its Measurement // Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 2012. Vol. 18. Iss. 1. P. 40—61. doi: 10.1037/a0026860
8. Blake R.R., Mouton J.S. The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1964. 350 p.
9. Boros S. Struggles for cooperation: conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups // Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2010. Vol. 25. Iss. 5. P. 539—554. doi: 10.1108/02683941011048418
10. Croucher S.M., Bruno A., McGrath P., et al. Conflict Styles and High-Low Context Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Extension // Communication Research Reports. 2012. Vol. 29. Iss. 1. P. 64—73. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.640093
11. Davidheiser M. Race, Worldviews, and Conflict Mediation: Black and White Styles of Conflict Revisited // Peace & Change. 2008. Vol. 33. Iss. 1. P. 60—89. doi: j.1468- 0130.2007.00476.x
12. Drake L.E. Negotiation styles in intercultural communication // The International Journal of Conflict Management. 1995. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. P. 72—90. doi: 10.1108/eb022756
13. Dsilva M.U., Whyte L.O. Cultural differences in conflict styles: Vietnamese refugees and established residents // Communication Abstracts. 1998. Vol. 21. Iss. 3. P. 57—68. doi: 10.1080/106461798247113
14. Euwema M.C., Hetty Van Emerik I.J. Intercultural competencies and conglomerated conflict behaviors in intercultural conflict // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2007. Vol. 31. Iss. 4. P. 427—441. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.11.001
15. Ford B.Q., Mauss I.B. Culture and emotion regulation // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2015. Vol. 3. P. 1—5. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.004
16. Gudykunst W.B. Uncertainty and anxiety // Theories of intercultural communication / Ed. by Y.Y. Kim, W.B. Gudykunst. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988. P. 123—156.
17. Gudykunst W.B. Theorizing About Intercultural Communication. SAGE Publications, 2004. 480 p.
18. Gunkel M., Schlaegel C., Taras V. Cultural values, emotional intelligence, and conflict handling styles: A global study // Journal of World Business. 2016. Vol. 51. Iss. 4. P. 568— 585. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.001
19. Hall E. Beyond culture. Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1976. 316 p.
20. Hammer M.R. Solving Problems and Resolving Conflict Using the Intercultural Conflict Style Model and Inventory // Contemporary Leadership and Intercultural Competence / Ed. by M.A. Moodian. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009. P. 219—232.
21. Hammer M.R. The Developmental paradigm for intercultural competence research // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2015. Vol. 48. P. 12—13. doi: 10.1016/j. ijintrel.2015.03.004
22. Hobfoll S.E., Freedy J., Lane C., Geller P. Conservation of social resources: Social support resource theory // Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1990. Vol. 7. P. 465—478. doi: 10.1177/0265407590074004
23. Kagan S., Knight G., Martinez-Romero S. Culture and the development of conflict resolution style // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1982. Vol. 13. P. 43—59. doi: 10.1177/0022022182131005
24. Kim M.-S., Kitani K. Conflict management styles of Asian- and Caucasian-Americans in romantic relationships in Hawaii // Journal of Asian Pacific Communication. 1998. Vol. 8. Iss. 1. P. 51—68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002
25. Kim E.j., Yamaguchi A., Kim M.-S., et al. Effects of taking conflict personally on conflict management styles across cultures // Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. Vol. 72. P. 143—149. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.004
26. Kimmel P. Culture and Conflict // The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice / Ed. by P.T. Coleman, M. Deutsch, E.C. Marcus. Jossey-Bass, 2014. P. 625—649.
27. Kochman T. Black and white styles in conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. 184 p.
28. Komarraju M., Dollinger S.J., Lovell J.L. Individualism-collectivism in horizontal and vertical directions as predictors of conflict management styles // International Journal of Conflict Management. 2008. Vol. 19. Iss. 1. P. 20—35. doi: 10.1108/10444060810849164
29. Kozan M.K. Relationships of hierarchy and topics of conflict management styles: A comparative study // Theory and research in conflict management / Ed. by M.A. Rahim. N.Y.: Praeger Publishers, 1990. P. 174—187.
30. Langeland E., Wahl A.K. The impact of social support on mental health service users’ sense of coherence: A longitudinal panel study // International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009. Vol. 46. P. 830—837. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.017
31. Lebedeva N., Tatarko A., Berry J.W. Are intercultural contacts dangerous or profitable for person and society? Intercultural relations in Russia and Latvia // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2016. Vol. 9. Iss. 1. P. 41—56.
32. Leung K. Some determinants of conflict avoidance // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1988. Vol. 19. Iss. 1. P. 125—136.
33. Leung K. Beliefs in Chinese culture // The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford University Press, 2010. P. 221—240.
34. Leung K., Stephan W.G. Social justice from a cultural perspective // The handbook of culture and psychology / Ed. by D. Matsumoto. Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 375— 410.
35. Lin Y., Rancer A.S., Lim S. Ethnocentrism and intercultural willingness to communicate: A cross cultural comparison between Korean and American college students // Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 2003. Vol. 32. P. 117—128.
36. Ma Z., Erkus A., Tabak A. Explore the impact of collectivism on conflict management styles: a Turkish study // International Journal of Conflict Management (Emerald). 2010. Vol. 21. Iss. 2. P. 169—185. doi: 10.1108/10444061011037396
37. MacGeorge E.L., Feng B., Burleson B.R. Supportive communication // The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication / Ed. by M.L. Knapp, J.A. Daly. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2013. P. 317—354.
38. Marsella A.J. Culture and conflict: Understanding, negotiating, and reconciling conflicting constructions of reality // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2005. Vol. 29. P. 651—673. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.012
39. Marsella A.J. The Challenges of ethno-cultural diversity in an era of asymmetric globalization // Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. 2011. Vol. 4. P. 52—58. doi: 10.1080/17467586.2011.603346
40. Matsumoto D., Choi J.W., Hirayama S., et al. Culture, display rules, and emotion judgments // Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society. In press.
41. Matsumoto D., Hwang H.C. The role of contempt in intercultural communication // Cross-Cultural Research. 2015. Vol. 40. Iss. 5. P. 439—460. doi: 10.1177/1069397115599542
42. Minkov M., Hofstede G. Hofstede’s fifth dimension: New evidence from the World Values Survey // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2012. Vol. 43. Iss. 1. P. 3—14. doi: 10.1177/0022022110388567
43. Montes C., Rodriguez D., Serrano G. Affective choice of conflict management styles // International Journal of Conflict Management. 2012. Vol. 23. P. 6—18. doi: 10.1108/10444061211199304
44. Neuliep J.W., McCroskey. The development of intercultural and interethnic communication apprehension scales // Communication Research Reports. 1997. Vol. 14. P. 145—156. doi: 10.1080/08824099709388656
45. Neuliep J.W. The relationship among intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, uncertainty reduction, and communication satisfaction during initial intercultural interactions: An extension of anxiety and uncertainty management (AUM) theory // Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 2012. Vol. 41. P. 1—16. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2011.623239
46. Neuliep J.W., Ryan D.J. The influence of intercultural communication apprehension and socio-communicative orientation on uncertainty reduction during initial cross-cultural interaction // Communication Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 46. P. 88—99. doi: 10.1080/01463379809370086
47. Nisbett R., Cohen D. Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South Denver. Westview Press, 1996. 144 p.
48. Nomura N., Barnlund D. Patterns of interpersonal criticism in Japan and the United States // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1983. Vol. 7. P. 1—18. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
49. Oetzel J.G., Myers K., Meares M., Estefana L. Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Exploring conflict styles via face-negotiation theory // Communication Research Reports. 2003. Vol. 20. Iss. 2. P. 106—115.
50. Oetzel J.G., Ting-Toomey S. Face concerns and facework during conflict: A test of the face-negotiation theory // Communication Research. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 599—624. doi: 10.1177/0093650203257841
51. Oetzel J.G. Intercultural competence in organizations // The Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence / Ed. by J.M. Benett. Sage Publications. 2015. Vol. 2. P. 489—492
52. Oommen D. The relationship between mental distress, assessed in terms of anxiety and depression, and conflict management in the context of cultural adaptation // Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. 2013. Vol. 42. P. 91—111. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2012.744341
53. Pearson V.M., Stephan W.G. Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the US // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1998. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. P. 67—83. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00036-9
54. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L. A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 90. Iss. 5. P. 751—783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
55. Pruitt D.G., Rubin J., Kim S.H. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Education, 2003. 316 p.
56. Putnam L., Wilson C. Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement // Communication yearbook Vol. 6. / Ed. by M. Burgoon. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. P. 629—652.
57. Rahim M.A. Rahim organizational conflict inventories: Professional manual. N.Y.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983. 171 p.
58. Symister P., Friend R. The influence of social support and problematic support on optimism and depression in chronic illness: A prospective study evaluating self-esteem as a mediator // Health Psychology. 2003. Vol. 22. P. 123—129. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.123
59. Tashchian A., Forrester W.R., Kalamas M. The Effects of Extroversion on Conflict Resolution in Student Teams: A Cross-Cultural Comparison // Journal of International Education Research. 2014. Vol. 10. Iss. 1. P. 29—36. doi: 10.19030/jier.v10i1.8348
60. Thomas K.W. Toward multi-dimensional values in teaching: The example of conflict behaviors // Academy of Management Review. 1977. Vol. 2. P. 484—490.
61. Thomas K.W., Kilmann R.H. Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “mode” instrument // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1977. Vol. 37. Iss. 2. P. 309— 325.
62. Ting-Toomey S., Kurogi A. Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face negotiation theory // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1998. Vol. 22. P. 187—225. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2
63. Ting-Toomey S., Oetzel J.G. Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively. SAGE Publications, 2001. 248 p.
64. Ting-Toomey S., Yee-Jung K.K., Shapiro R.B., et al. Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2000. Vol. 24. P. 47—81. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00023-1
65. Ting-Toomey S. Applying Dimensional Values in Understanding Intercultural Communication // Communication Monographs. 2010. Vol. 77. Iss. 2. P. 169—180. doi: 10.1080/03637751003790428
66. Ting-Toomey S. Conflict Facework Theory // The Sage Encyclopedia of intercultural Competence / Ed. by J.M. Benett. 1st Ed. SAGE Publications, 2015. P. 325—330.
67. Torres J.B., Solberg S.V. Role of self-efficacy, stress, social integration, and family support in Latino college student persistence and health // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2001. Vol. 59. P. 53—63. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1785
68. Tong Y., Chen G.-M. Intercultural Sensitivity and Conflict Management Styles in Cross-Cultural Organizational // Intercultural Communication Studies. 2008. Vol. 17. Iss. 2. P. 149—161.
69. Triandis H.C., Marin G., Lisansky J. et al. Simpatia as a cultural script for Hispanics // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984. Vol. 47. P. 1363—1375. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1363
70. Trippe B., Baumoel D. Beyond the Thomas-Kilmann model: Into extreme conflict // Negotiation Journal. 2015. Vol. 31. Iss. 2. P. 89-103. doi: 10.1111/nejo.12084
71. Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner C. Riding the waves of culture. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Education, 2012. 400 p.
72. Trubisky P., Ting-Toomey S., Lin S.-L. The influence of individualism-collectivism and selfmonitoring on conflict styles // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1991. Vol. 15. P. 65—84. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(91)90074-Q
73. Tsai J-S., Chi J.-S. Influences of Chinese Cultural Orientations and Conflict Management Styles on Construction Dispute Resolving Strategies // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2009. Vol. 135. Iss. 10. P. 955—964. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:10(955)
74. Ward A.-K., Ravlin E.C., Klaas B.S. et al. When do high-context communications speak up? Exploring contextual communication orientation and employee voice // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2016. Vol. 101. Iss. 10. P. 1498—1511. doi: 10.1037/apl0000144
75. Wolfson K., Norden M. Measuring responses to filmed interpersonal conflict: A rules approach // Methods for intercultural research / Ed. by W.B. Gudykunst, Y.Y. Kim. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984. P. 155—166.
76. Worchel S. Culture’s role in conflict and conflict management: Some suggestions, many questions // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2005. Vol. 29. P. 739—757. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.011
77. Zhang Q., Ting-Toomey S., Oetzel J.G. et al. The emotional side of forgiveness: A cross cultural investigation of the role of anger and compassion and face threat in interpersonal forgiveness and reconciliation // Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. 2015. Vol. 8. Iss. 4. P. 311—329. doi: 10.1080/17513057.2015.1087094