Статников А.И. кандидат психологических наук, педагог-психолог, Государственное бюджетное учреждение г. Москвы «Городской психолого-педагогический центр Департамента образования и науки г. Москвы», Москва, Россия ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8868-8257 e-mail: StatnikovAI@gppc.ru
Игра «Хорошее поведение» — процедура, направленная на изменение поведения всех членов учебной группы посредством взаимозависимого группового договора. В предлагаемой статье рассматриваются вопросы устойчивости и генерализации изменений, достигнутых посредством игры (включая возможные тактики поддержания и обобщения результатов). Также описываются кросскультурные аспекты применения процедуры, сведения о том, какую реакцию применение процедуры вызывает у педагогов, и какие изменения происходят в их поведении. Приводится ряд возможных модификаций процедуры, среди которых можно выделить игру «Поймай на хорошем поведении», игры «Хорошая инклюзия» и «Хороший ученик».
Вепринцева А.В., Статников А.И. Опыт ведения
социальной группы для подростков и молодых людей с расстройствами
аутистического спектра // Прикладной анализ поведения: теория и практика:
Развитие навыков речи и общения у детей с РАС: 19—20 сентября 2015 года, г.
Москва: Сборник материалов конференции. Москва: Ассоциация специалистов
Прикладного Анализа Поведения, 2015. С. 5—17.
Купер Дж.О., Херон Т.Э., Хьюард У.Л. Прикладной
анализ поведения. Москва: Практика, 2016. 826 с. ISBN 978-5- 89816-157-6.
Статников А.И. Игра «Хорошее поведение»: история и
современные тренды // Аутизм и нарушения развития. 2021. Т. 19. № 2. С. 40—51.
DOI:10.17759/autdd.2021710205
Стефаненко Т.Г. Этнопсихология: Учебник для
студентов вузов. Москва: Аспект Пресс, 2019. 352 с. ISBN 978-5-
7567-0731-1.
Babyak A.E., Luze G.J., Kamps D.M. The Good Student
Game: Behavior Management for Diverse Classrooms. Intervention in School and
Clinic, 2000, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216—223.
DOI:10.1177/105345120003500403
Barrish H.H., Saunders M., Wolf M.M. Good behavior
game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive
behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,
vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 119—124. DOI:10.1901/ jaba.1969.2-119
Beisswingert B.M., Zhang K., Goetz T. et al. The
effects of subjective loss of control on risk-taking behavior: The mediating
role of anger. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, vol. 6, article no. 774.
17 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00774
Breeman L.D., van Lier P.A.C., Wubbels T. et al.
Effects of the Good Behavior Game on the Behavioral, Emotional, and Social
Problems of Children With Psychiatric Disorders in Special Education Settings.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2016, vol. 18, no. 3, pp.
156—167. DOI:10.1177/1098300715593466
Dadakhodjaeva K. The Good Behavior Game: Effects On
and Maintenance of Behavior in Middle-School Classrooms Using Class Dojo [Web
resource]: Ph.D. in Psychology dissertation. 2017. 102 p. URL:
https://aquila.usm.edu/ dissertations/363 (Accessed 27.08.2021).
Dadakhodjaeva K., Radley K.C., Tingstrom D.H. et
al. Effects of daily and reduced frequency implementation of the Good
Behavior Game in kindergarten classrooms. Behavior Modification, 2019,
vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 471—495. DOI:10.1177/0145445519826528
Dillenburger K, Coyle C. Education for all: The
Good Inclusion Game. Behavioral Interventions, 2019, vol. 34, no. 3. pp.
338—351. DOI:10.1002/bin.1671
Donaldson J.M., Wiskow K.M., Soto P.L. Immediate
and distal effects of the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 2015, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 685—689. DOI:10.1002/jaba.229
Donaldson J.M., Matter A.L., Wiskow K.M.
Feasibility of and teacher preference for student-led implementation of the
good behavior game in early elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 2018, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 118— 129.
DOI:10.1002/jaba.432
Donaldson J.M., Lozy E.D., Galjour M. Effects of
systematically removing components of the Good Behavior Game in preschool
classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2019, pp. 1—15.
DOI:10.1007/s10864-019-09351-8
Flower A., McKenna J., Muething C.S. et al. Effects
of the Good Behavior Game on Challenging Behaviors in School Settings.
Review of Educational Research, 2014, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 546—571.
DOI:10.3102/0034654314536781
Flower A., McKenna J., Muething C.S. et al. Effects
of the Good Behavior Game on Classwide Off-Task Behavior in a High School Basic
Algebra Resource Classroom. Behavior Modification, 2014, vol. 38, no. 1,
pp. 45—68. DOI:10.1177/0145445513507574
Gelfand M.J., Raver J.L., Nishii L. et al.
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.
Science, 2011, vol. 332, no. 6033, pp. 1100—1104.
DOI:10.1126/science.1197754
Groves E.A., Austin J.L. An evaluation of
interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior
game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2017, vol. 50, no. 3, pp.
552—566. DOI:10.1002/jaba.393
Groves E.А., Austin J.L. Does the
Good Behavior Game evoke negative peer pressure? Analyses in primary and
secondary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019, vol.
52, no. 1, pp. 3—16. DOI:10.1002/jaba.513
Humphrey N., Hennessey A., Ashworth E. et al. Good
Behaviour Game: Evaluation report and executive summary: July 2018 [Web
resource]. London: Education Endowment Foundation, 2018. 124 p. URL:
https://educationendowmentfoundation.
org.uk/public/files/GBG_evaluation_report.pdf (Accessed 02.09.2021).
Joslyn P.R., Donaldson J.M., Austin J.L., Vollmer
T.R. The Good Behavior Game: A brief review. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 2019, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 811—815. DOI:10.1002/jaba.572
Joslyn P., Vollmer T., Kronfli F. Interdependent
Group Contingencies Reduce Disruption in Alternative High School Classrooms.
Journal of Behavioral Education, 2019, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 423—434.
DOI:10.1007/s10864-019-09321-0
Joslyn P.R., Vollmer T.R. Efficacy of
teacher-implemented Good Behavior Game despite low treatment integrity.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2020, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 465—474.
DOI:10.1002/jaba.614
Joslyn P.R., Austin J.L., Donaldson J.M., Vollmer
T.R. A practitioner’s guide to the good behavior game. Behavior
Analysis: Research and Practice, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 219—235.
DOI:10.1037/bar0000199
Kellam S.G., Wang W., Mackenzie A.C.L. et al. The
Impact of the Good Behavior Game, a Universal Classroom-Based Preventive
Intervention in First and Second Grades, on High-Risk Sexual Behaviors and Drug
Abuse and Dependence Disorders into Young Adulthood. Prevention science,
2014, vol. 15, pp. 6—18. DOI:10.1007/s11121-012-0296-z
Lannie A.L., McCurdy B.L. Preventing disruptive
behavior in the urban classroom: Effects of the Good Behavior Game on student
and teacher behavior. Education&Treatment of
Children, 2007, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 85—98. DOI:10.1353/ etc.2007.0002
Leflot G., van Lier P.A.C., Onghena P., Colpin H.
The role of children’s on-task behavior in the prevention of
aggressive behavior development and peer rejection: a randomized controlled
study of the Good Behavior Game in Belgian elementary classrooms. Journal of
School Psychology, 2013, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 187—199. DOI:10.1016/j.
jsp.2012.12.006
Nolan J.D., Jenson W., Houlihan D. et al. The Good
Behavior Game: A classroom-behavior intervention effective across cultures.
School Psychology International, 2013, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 191—205.
DOI:10.1177/0143034312471473
Nolan J.D., Filter K.J., Houlihan D. Preliminary
report: An application of the Good Behavior Game in the developing nation of
Belize. School Psychology International, 2014, vol. 35, no. 4, pp.
421—428. DOI:10.1177/0143034313498958
Pennington B., McComas J.J. Effects of the good
behavior game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 2017, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 176—180. DOI:10.1002/jaba.357
Ramirez L.H., Hawkins R.O., Collins T.A. et al.
Generalizing the effects of group contingencies across instructional settings
for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology
Review, 2019, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 98—112.
DOI:10.17105/SPR-2017-0122.V48-1
Rubow C.C., Vollmer T.R., Joslyn P.R. Effects of
the Good Behavior Game on student and teacher behavior in an alternative
school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2018, vol. 51, no. 2, pp.
382—392. DOI:10.1002/jaba.455
Saigh P.A., Umar A.M. The effects of a good
behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sundanese elementary school
students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1983, vol. 16, no. 3,
pp. 339—344. DOI:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-339
Salend S.J., Reynolds C.J., Coyle E.M.
Individualizing the Good Behavior Game Across Type and Frequency of Behavior
with Emotionally Disturbed Adolescents. Behavior Modification, 1989,
vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 108—126. DOI:10.1177/01454455890131007
Split J.L., Leflot G., Onghena P., Colpin H. Use of
Praise and Reprimands as Critical Ingredients of Teacher Behavior Management:
Effects on Children’s Development in the Context of a Teacher- Mediated
Classroom Intervention. Prevention Science, 2016, vol. 17, pp. 732—742.
DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0667-y
Tanol G., Johnson L., McComas J., Cote E.
Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions
of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students. Journal of School
Psychology, 2010, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 337—355.
DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.001
Tingstrom D.H. The good behavior game: An
investigation of teachers’ acceptance. Psychology in the Schools, 1994,
vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57—65.
DOI:10.1002/1520-6807(199401)31:1<57::AID-PITS2310310108>3.0.CO;2-K
Van Lier, P.A.C., Vuijk, P., Crijnen A.A.M.
Understanding mechanisms of change in the development of antisocial behavior:
The impact of a universal intervention. Journal of Abnormal Child
Psychology, 2005, vol. 33, pp. 521—535. DOI:10.1007/
s10802-005-6735-7
Wahl E., Hawkins R.O., Haydon T. et al. Comparing
Versions of the Good Behavior Game: Can a Positive Spin Enhance Effectiveness?
Behavior Modification, 2016, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 493—517.
DOI:10.1177/0145445516644220
Wilcox H.C., Kellam S.G., Brown C.H. et al. The
impact of two universal randomized first- and second-grade classroom
interventions on young adult suicide ideation and attempts. Drug and Alcohol
Dependence, 2008, vol. 95, no. Supplement 1, pp. S60—S73.
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.005