Игра «Хорошее поведение»: история и современные тренды. Часть 2 ¹⁰⁵

Игра «Хорошее поведение» — процедура, направленная на изменение поведения всех членов учебной группы посредством взаимозависимого группового договора. В предлагаемой статье рассматриваются вопросы устойчивости и генерализации изменений, достигнутых посредством игры (включая возможные тактики поддержания и обобщения результатов). Также описываются кросскультурные аспекты применения процедуры, сведения о том, какую реакцию применение процедуры вызывает у педагогов, и какие изменения происходят в их поведении. Приводится ряд возможных модификаций процедуры, среди которых можно выделить игру «Поймай на хорошем поведении», игры «Хорошая инклюзия» и «Хороший ученик».

Ключевые слова: прикладной анализ поведения, групповая работа, взаимозависимый групповой договор, игра «Хорошее поведение», игра «Поймай на хорошем поведении», игра «Хорошая инклюзия», расстройства аутистического спектра

Рубрика: Методы обучения и сопровождения

Тип: научная статья

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/autdd.2021190301

1. Вепринцева А.В., Статников А.И. Опыт ведения социальной группы для подростков и молодых людей с расстройствами аутистического спектра // Прикладной анализ поведения: теория и практика: Развитие навыков речи и общения у детей с РАС: 19—20 сентября 2015 года, г. Москва: Сборник материалов конференции. Москва: Ассоциация специалистов Прикладного Анализа Поведения, 2015. С. 5—17.
2. Купер Дж.О., Херон Т.Э., Хьюард У.Л. Прикладной анализ поведения. Москва: Практика, 2016. 826 с. ISBN 978-5- 89816-157-6.
3. Статников А.И. Игра «Хорошее поведение»: история и современные тренды // Аутизм и нарушения развития. 2021. Т. 19. № 2. С. 40—51. DOI:10.17759/autdd.2021710205
4. Стефаненко Т.Г. Этнопсихология: Учебник для студентов вузов. Москва: Аспект Пресс, 2019. 352 с. ISBN 978-5- 7567-0731-1.
5. Babyak A.E., Luze G.J., Kamps D.M. The Good Student Game: Behavior Management for Diverse Classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 2000, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216—223. DOI:10.1177/105345120003500403
6. Barrish H.H., Saunders M., Wolf M.M. Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 119—124. DOI:10.1901/ jaba.1969.2-119
7. Beisswingert B.M., Zhang K., Goetz T. et al. The effects of subjective loss of control on risk-taking behavior: The mediating role of anger. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, vol. 6, article no. 774. 17 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00774
8. Breeman L.D., van Lier P.A.C., Wubbels T. et al. Effects of the Good Behavior Game on the Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Problems of Children With Psychiatric Disorders in Special Education Settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2016, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 156—167. DOI:10.1177/1098300715593466
9. Dadakhodjaeva K. The Good Behavior Game: Effects On and Maintenance of Behavior in Middle-School Classrooms Using Class Dojo [Web resource]: Ph.D. in Psychology dissertation. 2017. 102 p. URL: https://aquila.usm.edu/ dissertations/363 (Accessed 27.08.2021).
10. Dadakhodjaeva K., Radley K.C., Tingstrom D.H. et al. Effects of daily and reduced frequency implementation of the Good Behavior Game in kindergarten classrooms. Behavior Modification, 2019, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 471—495. DOI:10.1177/0145445519826528
11. Dillenburger K, Coyle C. Education for all: The Good Inclusion Game. Behavioral Interventions, 2019, vol. 34, no. 3. pp. 338—351. DOI:10.1002/bin.1671
12. Donaldson J.M., Wiskow K.M., Soto P.L. Immediate and distal effects of the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2015, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 685—689. DOI:10.1002/jaba.229
13. Donaldson J.M., Matter A.L., Wiskow K.M. Feasibility of and teacher preference for student-led implementation of the good behavior game in early elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2018, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 118— 129. DOI:10.1002/jaba.432
14. Donaldson J.M., Lozy E.D., Galjour M. Effects of systematically removing components of the Good Behavior Game in preschool classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2019, pp. 1—15. DOI:10.1007/s10864-019-09351-8
15. Flower A., McKenna J., Muething C.S. et al. Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Challenging Behaviors in School Settings. Review of Educational Research, 2014, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 546—571. DOI:10.3102/0034654314536781
16. Flower A., McKenna J., Muething C.S. et al. Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Classwide Off-Task Behavior in a High School Basic Algebra Resource Classroom. Behavior Modification, 2014, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 45—68. DOI:10.1177/0145445513507574
17. Gelfand M.J., Raver J.L., Nishii L. et al. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science, 2011, vol. 332, no. 6033, pp. 1100—1104. DOI:10.1126/science.1197754
18. Groves E.A., Austin J.L. An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2017, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 552—566. DOI:10.1002/jaba.393
19. Groves E.А., Austin J.L. Does the Good Behavior Game evoke negative peer pressure? Analyses in primary and secondary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 3—16. DOI:10.1002/jaba.513
20. Humphrey N., Hennessey A., Ashworth E. et al. Good Behaviour Game: Evaluation report and executive summary: July 2018 [Web resource]. London: Education Endowment Foundation, 2018. 124 p. URL: https://educationendowmentfoundation. org.uk/public/files/GBG_evaluation_report.pdf (Accessed 02.09.2021).
21. Joslyn P.R., Donaldson J.M., Austin J.L., Vollmer T.R. The Good Behavior Game: A brief review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 811—815. DOI:10.1002/jaba.572
22. Joslyn P., Vollmer T., Kronfli F. Interdependent Group Contingencies Reduce Disruption in Alternative High School Classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2019, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 423—434. DOI:10.1007/s10864-019-09321-0
23. Joslyn P.R., Vollmer T.R. Efficacy of teacher-implemented Good Behavior Game despite low treatment integrity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2020, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 465—474. DOI:10.1002/jaba.614
24. Joslyn P.R., Austin J.L., Donaldson J.M., Vollmer T.R. A practitioner’s guide to the good behavior game. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 219—235. DOI:10.1037/bar0000199
25. Kellam S.G., Wang W., Mackenzie A.C.L. et al. The Impact of the Good Behavior Game, a Universal Classroom-Based Preventive Intervention in First and Second Grades, on High-Risk Sexual Behaviors and Drug Abuse and Dependence Disorders into Young Adulthood. Prevention science, 2014, vol. 15, pp. 6—18. DOI:10.1007/s11121-012-0296-z
26. Lannie A.L., McCurdy B.L. Preventing disruptive behavior in the urban classroom: Effects of the Good Behavior Game on student and teacher behavior. Education & Treatment of Children, 2007, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 85—98. DOI:10.1353/ etc.2007.0002
27. Leflot G., van Lier P.A.C., Onghena P., Colpin H. The role of children’s on-task behavior in the  prevention  of aggressive behavior development and peer rejection: a randomized controlled study of the Good Behavior Game in Belgian elementary classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 2013, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 187—199. DOI:10.1016/j. jsp.2012.12.006
28. Nolan J.D., Jenson W., Houlihan D. et al. The Good Behavior Game: A classroom-behavior intervention effective across cultures. School Psychology International, 2013, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 191—205. DOI:10.1177/0143034312471473
29. Nolan J.D., Filter K.J., Houlihan D. Preliminary report: An application of the Good Behavior Game in the developing nation of Belize. School Psychology International, 2014, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 421—428. DOI:10.1177/0143034313498958
30. Pennington B., McComas J.J. Effects of the good behavior game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2017, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 176—180. DOI:10.1002/jaba.357
31. Ramirez L.H., Hawkins R.O., Collins T.A. et al. Generalizing the effects of group contingencies across instructional settings for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 2019, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 98—112. DOI:10.17105/SPR-2017-0122.V48-1
32. Rubow C.C., Vollmer T.R., Joslyn P.R. Effects of the Good Behavior Game on student and teacher behavior in an alternative school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2018, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 382—392. DOI:10.1002/jaba.455
33. Saigh P.A., Umar A.M. The effects of a good behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sundanese elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1983, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 339—344. DOI:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-339
34. Salend S.J., Reynolds C.J., Coyle E.M. Individualizing the Good Behavior Game Across Type and Frequency of Behavior with Emotionally Disturbed Adolescents. Behavior Modification, 1989, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 108—126. DOI:10.1177/01454455890131007
35. Split J.L., Leflot G., Onghena P., Colpin H. Use of Praise and Reprimands as Critical Ingredients of Teacher Behavior Management: Effects on Children’s Development in the Context of a Teacher- Mediated Classroom Intervention. Prevention Science, 2016, vol. 17, pp. 732—742. DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0667-y
36. Tanol G., Johnson L., McComas J., Cote E. Responding to rule violations or rule following: A comparison of two versions of the Good Behavior Game with kindergarten students. Journal of School Psychology, 2010, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 337—355. DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.001
37. Tingstrom D.H. The good behavior game: An investigation of teachers’ acceptance. Psychology in the Schools, 1994, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57—65. DOI:10.1002/1520-6807(199401)31:1<57::AID-PITS2310310108>3.0.CO;2-K
38. Van Lier, P.A.C., Vuijk, P., Crijnen A.A.M. Understanding mechanisms of change in the development of antisocial behavior: The impact of a universal intervention. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2005, vol. 33, pp. 521—535. DOI:10.1007/ s10802-005-6735-7
39. Wahl E., Hawkins R.O., Haydon T. et al. Comparing Versions of the Good Behavior Game: Can a Positive Spin Enhance Effectiveness? Behavior Modification, 2016, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 493—517. DOI:10.1177/0145445516644220
40. Wilcox H.C., Kellam S.G., Brown C.H. et al. The impact of two universal randomized first- and second-grade classroom interventions on young adult suicide ideation and attempts. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2008, vol. 95, no. Supplement 1, pp. S60—S73. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.005