Revealing skills of elementary school students to work together in situation of socio-cognitive conflict

2122

Abstract

The article considers relevant for modern school education meta-subject ability of elementary school students to work together. Evaluation of this ability formation is the aim of the study. We propose a new diagnostic technique to assess students’ group work success in conditions of externally set socio-cognitive conflict. We estimate the differentiating capabilities of this method on the experimental results obtained in different schools of Moscow. It is shown that the average ability of primary school graduates to work in a group is not enough formed, which is supported by a comparative assessment of the successful results of the school oriented on development of children interaction in educational process. We conclude about the necessity of this meta-subject ability formation by specially organized training in the classroom.

General Information

Keywords: meta-subject ability, group problem solving, interaction diagnostic, socio-cognitive conflict, elementary school

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Polivanova N.I., Rivina I.V., Ulanovskaya I.M. Revealing skills of elementary school students to work together in situation of socio-cognitive conflict [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2013. Vol. 5, no. 4 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Guruzhapov V.A. Uchet mnozhestvennosti reshenij zadach, napravlennyh na razvitie metapredmetnyh kompetencij v processe scenirovanija uchitelem uchebno-razvivajushhih situacij [Account the multiplicity of solutions of problems aimed at developing competencies in the process metapredmetnyh stsenirovaniya teacher training and developing situations]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2012. № 1. P. 40-45.
  2. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Psihologija upravlenija sovmestnoj dejatel'nost'ju: novye napravlenija issledovanij [Management Psychology joint activity: new directions for research]. Moscow, 2010. P. 40-45.
  3. Zimnjaja I.A. Kljuchevye kompetencii – novaja paradigma rezul'tata obrazovanija [Key competencies - a new paradigm of education result]. Jejdos. 2006. 5 maja. Available at: http://www.eidos.ru/ journal/2006/0505.htm. (Accessed 05.05.2006)
  4. Kak proektirovat' universal'nye uchebnye dejstvija v nachal'noj shkole / Pod red. A.G. Asmolova. Moscow, 2008. 151 p.
  5. Klimonova G.N. Opyt organizacii gruppovoj raboty na urokah // Jejdos. 2008. 18 dekabrja. Jelektronnaja versija: Available at: http://eidos.ru/ journal/2008/1218.htm (Accessed 18.12.2008).
  6. .Kommunikativno-orientirovannye obrazovatel'nye sredy. Psihologija proektirovanija / Pod red. V.V. Rubcova. Moscow, 1996. 158 p.
  7. Krickij A.G., Shherbinin M.Ju. Komp'juternye kommunikacii v sovmestnoj uchebnoj dejatel'nosti [ Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2006. №2. P. 93-104.
  8. Obuhova L.F. Socio-kognitivnyj podhod k issledovaniju intellektual'nogo razvitija rebenka [Socio-cognitive approach to the study of the intellectual development of the child]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 2010. №5. Jelektronnaja versija: Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/ psyedu. ru /2010/n5/Obuhova.shtml (Accessed 26 decabria 2010 year)
  9. Perre-Klermon A.N. Rol' social'nyh vzaimodejstvij v razvitii intellekta detej [The role of social interactions in the development of children's intelligence]. Moscow, 1991. 249 p.
  10. Polivanova N.I., Rivina I.V. Principy i forma organizacii sovmestnoj uchebnoj dejatel'nosti [Principles and form of organization of co-curricular activities]. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 1996. № 2.
  11. Raven Dzhon. Kompetentnost' v sovremennom obshhestve. Vyjavlenie, razvitie i realizacija [Competence in modern society. Identification, development and implementation]. Moscow: Kogito-Tzentr, 2002. 396 p.
  12. Rubcov V.V. Social'nye vzaimodejstvija i obuchenie: kul'turno-istoricheskij kontekst [Social interaction and learning: cultural and historical context]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. [Cultural - Historical Psychology], 2005. № 1. P. 14-24.
  13. Cukerman G.A. Sovmestnaja uchebnaja dejatel'nost' kak osnova formirovanija umenija uchit'sja. Avtoref. dokt. diss. [Co-curricular activities as a basis of the ability to learn. Author. Doctor … diss.].Moscow, 1992. P. 38-41.
  14. Adey P.  Cognitive acceleration: Thinking as intelligence / Teaching Thinking. 2001. № 5. pp. 38-41.
  15.  Apres Vygotski et Piaget. Perspectives sociale et constructiviste. Ecoles russe et occidentale / par C. Garnier, N. Bednarz, I. Ulanovskaya. Bruxelles: De Boeck Universite, 1991. 288 p.
  16.  Howe Ch., Tolmie A., Thurston A., Topping K., Christie D., Livingston K., Jessiman E., Donaldson C. Group work in elementary science: Towards organizational principles for supporting pupil learning // Learning and Instruction. 2007. V. 17. pp 549 – 563.
  17.  Gilly M. Remarques et reflexions a propos de didactique et de conflict socio-cognitif / Construction des savoirs. Ottawa, 1989.pp 51-68.
  18.  Meloth M.S., Deering P.D. The role of the teacher in promoting cognitive processing during collaborative learning. // Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, N.J.: A. O’Donnel, A. King (eds.), 1999. pp 235-255.
  19.  Polivanova N.I., Rivina I.V. Computer as Constructor in the Process of Organising Children’s Learning Interaction // Activity Theory. 1993. № 13/14.  Pp. 13-20.
  20. Ulanovskaya I, Yarkina O. Le probleme de la repartition des actions dans lactivite commune cognitive // Apres Vygotski et Piaget. Perspectives sociale et constructiviste. Ecoles russe et occidentale / par C. Garnier, N. Bednarz, I. Ulanovskaya. Bruxelles: De Boeck Universite, 1991. pp/ 237-246.
  21. Webb N.M., Tropper J.D., Fall R. Constructive activity and learning in  collaborative small groups // Journal of Educational Psychology. 1995. V. 87. pp 406 -423.

Information About the Authors

Nina I. Polivanova, PhD in Psychology, Leading Researcher, Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia

Irina V. Rivina, PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Psychiological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: irinarivina@yandex.ru

Irina M. Ulanovskaya, PhD in Psychology, Leading researcher, Laboratory of psychology of junor schoolchildren, Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6605-0615, e-mail: iulanovskaya@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2315
Previous month: 14
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 2122
Previous month: 17
Current month: 4